capital budgeting tools that financial managers and analysts use to evaluate the merits of an investment. Some of these techniques are quite intuitive and simple to use‚ such as payback analysis. Other techniques are a little more complex‚ such as the NPV and IRR approaches. In general‚ the more complex techniques provide more comprehensive evaluations‚ however‚ the simpler approaches often lead to the same value-maximizing decisions. Chapter 11 illustrates how to develop the capital budgeting cash flows
Premium Net present value
Thinking 4. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the Cash Payback Period‚ Discounted Cash Payback Period‚ NPV‚ IRR and MIRR capital expenditure budgeting methods. Prepare a recommendation for Stewart regarding the capital budgeting method or methods to use in evaluating the expansion alternatives. Support your answer. Capital budgeting techniques such as payback period‚ net present value (NPV)‚ internal rate of return (IRR) and modified internal rate of return (MIRR) all offer particular strengths
Premium Net present value Capital budgeting Internal rate of return
of each period we have a NPV of 79‚246 ‚ which is greater than the NPV of our project which is 23‚720. So assuming equal life of the projects and no other side-effect we would prefer to rent the site. Time 0 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year 4th Year 25‚000 25‚000 25‚000 25‚000 22‚727 20‚661 18‚783 17‚075 NPV: 79‚247 PVIF(10%‚1)( 25‚000) = 22‚727 PVIF(10%‚2)( 25‚000) = 20‚661 PVIF(10%‚3)( 25‚000) = 18‚783 PVIF(10%‚4)( 25‚000) = 17‚075 NPV
Premium Net present value Cash flow Cash
Zhong 1> A. Payback‚ NPV‚ IRR‚ Should purchase or not? Payback: $35‚000/5000=7 year NPV: =Co+ C1…..n/(1+i)^1….n Co=-3‚5000 CF1-CF15= 5‚000; I= 12 Computing result is $-945.67 IRR: 11.49% NPV is negative and IRR is lower 12% so reject the proposal. B. NPV: =Co+ C1…..n/(1+i)^1….n NPV= -35000+(4500/.12) =2500 NPV is positive so should purchase the machine. C. NPV: =Co+ C1…..n/(1+i)^1….n = -35‚000(4000/(0.12-0.04)) =-35‚000+50‚000 =15‚000 NPV is positive so rainbow should
Premium Net present value
platform? Net present Value of the Garage’s cash flow with Platform: NPV = £ 173‚614 Net present Value of the Garage’s cash flow with Platform: NPV = £ 38‚047 i. Should the garage manager buy the platform? Garage manager should buy the platform because‚ the productivity of the mechanics and profitability of the firm will increase as a result of the acquiring the platform. This will also positively affect to the NPV of the company cash flows and we can see it in above result. 2. The
Premium Net present value Time value of money
after tax cost savings and salvage value of the system. 2. What is the project’s NPV? Explain the economic rationale behind the NPV. Could the NPV of this particular project be different for GP Manufacturing than for one of Chino Material Systems Inc.’s other potential customers? Explain. NPV = $20‚578 NPV is a measure of profitability of an investment. If NPV is positive‚ the company should accept the project. The NPV would be the same for everyone if values were the same because it is just an estimate
Premium Net present value Investment Internal rate of return
(A) The payback is 35‚000/5‚000= 7 years Computation of the NPV : 15 NPV= -35‚000 + Σ 5‚000 / ( 1 + 12%)^ 15 i=1 NPV = $- 947. 67 Computation of the IRR : 15 0= -35‚000 + Σ 5‚000 / ( 1 + IRR)^ 15 i=1 IRR= 11.49% The NPV of this project is negative and the IRR is lower then the Cost of Capital (12%) Rainbow products shouldn’t go for
Premium Net present value Cash flow 1967
years b) The discounted Payback Period is 5.58 years c) The Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of the machine is 13.87% d) The Net Present Value (NPV) is $1‚136‚020.85 e) The Profitability Index (PI) associated with the project is 1.14 If we make decision based on NPV or IRR or PI‚ we should accept this project. This is because the project has a positive NPV‚ its PI over 1 and the IRR is more than the required rate of return. All of this factors mean that the project can actually benefit the company
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return
943 .890 Present value $6‚020 $4‚880 $9‚532 NPV $20‚432 11. a. Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Before-tax cash flow $(500‚000) $52‚500 $47‚500 $35‚500 $530‚500 Tax cost (7‚875) (7‚125) (5‚325) (4‚575) After-tax cash flow 44‚625 40‚375 30‚175 525‚925 Discount factor (7%) .935 .873 .816 .763 Present value $(500‚000) $41‚724 $35‚247 $24‚623 $401‚281 NPV $2‚875 Investor W should make the investment because NPV is positive. b. Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year
Premium Net present value Progressive tax Taxation
(NEM). First of all‚ under normal condition‚ this project could contribute around $73 million to the shareholder. The return will be more than 85% over the entire period. Furthermore‚ this project is quite stable because it can deliver a positive NPV for NEM when the iron ore price above $65.83 which is around 17% lower than basic price and more than 50% lower than the current price‚ smelting‚ refining and freight cost below $76.3 just below 60% higher than basic condition‚ the EBIT has to drop
Premium Iron ore Net present value Steel