Preview

Summary: What Does It Means To Be A Police Officer Untruthfulness

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1555 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary: What Does It Means To Be A Police Officer Untruthfulness
Disclosing Officer Untruthfulness to the Defense
Catrina M. Bonus
CJUS 350- D01
Professor Herbert W. Duff
December 12, 2014

Introduction
What does it mean to be a police officer? To most, it means to perform their duties with integrity, nobility honor, courage, and morality. While a very large percentage of law enforcement officers act in such a way, there are a few that do not and which shines a bad light toward the entire profession. Sadly in today’s culture, the respect for law enforcement is extremely low which makes it a difficult for those in the profession to do their jobs. While some may argue the concerns are warranted because of the lack of honesty and the bad actions of a small few, a mutual trust needs to be established …show more content…
United States
In Giglio v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the prosecution is required to share exculpatory evidence with the defense of the credibility of the prosecution’s witnesses. This could include evidence that may even impeach or expose the witness’s misconduct. Since the prosecution is an officer of the court, it is their responsibility to ensure that all relevant information regarding the case is effectively communicated with all involved.

United States v. Agurs
The Supreme Court determined in United States v. Agurs that it is the responsibility of the prosecution to provide pertinent information regardless if the defense requests it. In this case, the prosecution failed to provide the victim’s criminal history involving guilty pleas for weapons charges, which violated due process.

Kyles v. Whitley
In the case of Kyles v. Whitley, the Supreme Court overturned the conviction and allowed for a new trial on the basis that the prosecution did not disclose evidence to the defense. The Court determined regardless if the prosecutor was aware of the evidence or not, it is their responsibility to ensure that all pertinent information is communication to the defense.

United States v. …show more content…
That is why it is so important that officers have a moral code and to know right from wrong. Each decision and choice we make should not only be because it is the honorable thing to do but also because in the end, we know that we will be held accountable for those choices. As Isaiah 55:8-9 says “For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, declares the Lord. For as heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts”
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Rogers Vs Wycoff Case Summary
    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rogers Vs Wycoff Case Summary

    Defense attorney may argue based on two precedents of US Supreme Court - Booth v. Maryland (1987) and South Carolina v. Gathers (1989) and state that this testimony is irrelevant to the crime itself and is not connected to the facts of the case and also victim’s testimony is unacceptable during death penalty cases. But US Supreme Court overruled these two precedents by its decision on Payne v. Tennessee case (1991). This decision holds that testimony on the form of a victim impact statement is admissible during the sentencing phase of a trial and, in death penalty cases, does not violate the Cruel and Unusual Punishment…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ken Anderson Court Case Analysis
    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Ken Anderson Court Case Analysis

    While he puzzled over what the prosecutor might have meant, he thought back to an argument he’d had with Davis’s boss, Williamson County district attorney Ken Anderson, who had led the prosecution’s effort. During two pretrial hearings, the lawyers had clashed over what evidence the state should, or should not, have to turn over. As Allison remembered it, state district judge William Lott had ordered Anderson to provide him with all of Wood’s reports and notes before the trial so he could determine whether they contained any “Brady material.” (The term refers to the landmark 1963 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. Maryland, which holds that prosecutors are required to turn over any evidence that is favorable to the accused. Failure to do so is considered to be a “Brady violation,” or a breach of a defendant’s constitutional right to due process.)…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    State V. Rounds Case Summary
    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages

    State V. Rounds Case Summary

    In the case of State v. Rounds, the defense challenges the conduct of Officer Oliver Towns and the evidence his conduct yielded. The defense wages their action on three major cases, all of which apply, but none in the way cited: Riley V. California, 573 U.S. ____ (2014), Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, (1963) and Carroll v United States, 267 U.S. 132 (1925).…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Horton v California
    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Horton v California

    The defendant’s armed robbery conviction was upheld by the California Supreme Court, the defendant then petitioned the writ of certiorari, which is a decision by the Supreme Court to hear an appeal from a lower court. Justice Stevens then held that “Fourth Amendment does not prohibit warrantless seizure of evidence of crime in plain view.” That also goes if the finding of the evidence was not unintentional.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of Lawyers And Their Penchant For The Adversarial
    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Summary Of Lawyers And Their Penchant For The Adversarial

    The defense attorney’s ultimate objective is to contest to evidence presented by the…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    attorney-client privelge
    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages

    attorney-client privelge

    In the United States criminal juctice system truth seeking ought to take presidence over attorney client privielege.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ethical Behavior In Gradly Operant Conditioning
    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ethical Behavior In Gradly Operant Conditioning

    This theory holds that people learn ethical or unethical behaviors by grasping the rewards or punishment associated with these behaviors. The rewards, or lack thereof, encourage or condition a response from those receiving them. This was exemplified in the report by the compliance of Schoolcraft’s fellow officers with their supervisors demands for meeting the required number of citations. They were conditioned to follow orders, regardless of the unethicalness, because otherwise the officers would be given undesirable posts. They were also threatened with job loss, another more extreme…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Sheppard V Maxwell Landmark Case
    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Sheppard V Maxwell Landmark Case

    It is important to ensure that criminal defendants receive a fair trial and are not…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Tulsa Police Mission Statement
    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Tulsa Police Mission Statement

    The Tulsa Police Department’s mission is to help civilians feel safe and fearless in their homes and environments. By using knowledge, skills, and resources, the Tulsa Police Officers strive to provide quality service, protect life and all property, and work to prevent crime and problems in neighborhoods, businesses, schools, etc. Their mission statement can be compared to their goals. The department’s goal is to reduce criminal activity in the city while using resources and education, while the department and its officers also strive to be physically strong, ethically grounded, committed to the community, mentally tough, and will always put the community first. Being an officer is a difficult job, but they always ensure to put the civilians…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hurst Error Analysis
    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hurst Error Analysis

    A defendant is generally entitled to an evidentiary hearing. See Freeman v. State, 761 So. 2d 1055, 1061 (Fla. 2000). A circuit court can only…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Officer Code Of Silence Research Paper
    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Officer Code Of Silence Research Paper

    When a new recruit joins a police force he is bursting with excitement and anticipation to fulfill all of the principles and standards that come with being a police officer: dedication, loyalty, trust and integrity. He has a high set of standards and a set of goals he wants to achieve as an officer of the law such as stopping crime, improving the moral of the neighborhoods and becoming a positive mentor to the youth of the community. He has a new sense of belonging; he is now a member of a team, a brotherhood, an official member of an elite club; he is an officer of the law.…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona
    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Miranda Vs Arizona

    The United States has come a long way since the Constitution was created, and it has learned from the mistakes done. There has been a lot of cases where people did not have a fair trial and people has been sentenced unfairly. After serious mistakes, many bills have developed so the incident does not happen again. Unfortunately, people have to go through the worse so other people can benefit. After the case of Miranda v. Arizona, many people have benefit from it. Society as a whole has become better, and police officers now tell everyone their rights. We have come with the conclusion that everyone has the right to know their legal rights either by self-interest or because it is morally right.…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Federal Rule Of Evidence Essay
    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Federal Rule Of Evidence Essay

    Federal Rule of Evidence 403 says, “The court may exclude relevant evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by a danger of one or more of the following: unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, misleading the jury, undue delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative evidence” (2015). A defense attorney could utilize Motion in limine to request that the judge rule that certain testimony be excluded. The motion is always discussed outside the presence of the jury and is always decided by a judge. For example, after examining police reports and other documents it is detected that the crime scene was contaminated which could be argued that any DNA evidence taken from the scene is compromised and therefore any scientific evidence or expert opinions relating to this would be prejudicial. Another example could be that law enforcement did not procure proper search warrants before a search and seizure; therefore, all evidence gathered resulted in an improper discovery and should be excluded since it violates…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Wrongful Convictions
    • 3814 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Wrongful Convictions

    A lot of research has been carried out in the area of wrongful convictions in the past few years, reflecting the increasing concern for authentic justice in the criminal justice system. Criminal procedure experts do not seem to have been involved in actual dialogue with criminologists in…

    • 3814 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Police Reform
    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Police Reform

    Stoughton contends that a more fundamental reform is necessary: the core principles of policing need to be adjusted to change how officers view their job and their relationship with the community. The article also contributes to the discussion by arguing that police reform requires changing officers’ attitudes about policing itself. A few things the article stated was to encourage rightful policing, the value system that guides officer decision making must encourage individual officers to continually reconcile the short-term goals of policing, such as order maintenance and crime response, with the long-term goals, particularly improving police/community relations. To that end, law enforcement culture should seek to instill in officers the priorities of a Guardian: protecting civilians from unnecessary indignity and harm. Part I describes the evolution of policing, tracing the profession’s guiding principles and distinguishing characteristics from the world’s first modern public police agency. Part II introduces the Warrior principles that have permeated modern policing and discusses the effect those principles have had on the profession. It first describes the positive attributes of the Warrior that policing so highly values: honor, duty, resolve, and a willingness to engage in righteous violence. It then explores the psychological and practical appeal of the Warrior concept, and it describes how the Warrior imagery and rhetoric have become ubiquitous in law enforcement. Part III offers an alternative set of guiding principles in the form of Guardian policing. Guardian policing has enjoyed a surge in popularity among some police leaders, and Guardian rhetoric has appeared in the report issued by President Obama’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing, popular media stories, and articles intended for a law enforcement audience. We previously as a class readied and discussed as wrote analysis on the 21st Century of Policing and the panel…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics