Preview

Robert Morgan Haunted Courage Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
430 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Robert Morgan Haunted Courage Analysis
Robert Morgan, author of the article, “There is No True History of the Westward Expansion,” has central ideas to his articles that can be agreed with. His central ideas are that it wasn’t just the well-known people of history that made history, most of it was the masses. Morgan’s central ideas of crediting history to the thousands of people that aren’t well known are agreeable, in which this composition will explain why his central ideas are agreed upon.
In the book, Undaunted Courage, by Stephen Ambrose, the famous expeditions of Lewis and Clark, who were sent by president Thomas Jefferson to explore the uncharted westward regions of the United States, was a well noted event in history. But those who tagged along with Lewis and Clark in the journey were hardly mentioned. Those who supplied all the items
…show more content…
For example, in “Chief Joseph Speaks,” which were speeches from the chief of the Nez Perce tribe, Joseph states, “White men had found gold in the mountains around the land of the Winding Water. They stole a great many horses from us and we could not get them back because we were Indians.” This shows that in general, not just a few specific famous figures, had made history, which goes along with the agreed central ideas of Robert Morgan that history is mostly actually made up of average citizens.
Morgan’s central idea in his article shows when N. Scott Momaday, author of “The Way to Rainy Mountain,” because the historical portion of the book doesn’t specifically credit people who made history, which shows that history IS composed of the majority. Yes, the famous historical figures impacted the past, but in reality it’s the countless number of people that put together history.
Conclusively, Robert Morgan’s central ideas in his article, “There is no true history of the Westward Expansion,” can be agreed with. History doesn’t just come from the few historical people, but the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    For example, “The historian John Buchanan has called the westward expansion, or Manifest Destiny, ‘the greatest folk movement of modern times, in which, for the most part, the people led and government followed.’” from the text There is No True History of Westward Expansion. Morgan brings up one man's belief that the people led and the government followed. This is incorrect, due to the fact the Jefferson was the cause of the expedition and therefore westward expansion, which is described by…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Chris Kyle Research Paper

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What makes us an important part in history? Who we are, What we become, What we do. All theses things have one thing in common and that’s us. We decide who or what we will become. The day Chris Kyle was born he didn’t know what he wanted in life because he was to young to know. As he grew up he started becoming who he wanted to be. He wanted to be a bull rider.That was what he was raised on another thing was hunting.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    William Robertson’s book titled, “The History of America” volume III book v, will be used to further convey validity of scholarly works, and demonstrate how a source merits value for a historian. This book was written at the end of the 1700’s; therefore, historians…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The stories Columbus, the Indians, and Human Progress and A Patriot’s History of the United States have a greater difference than they do similarities. Each story has a different tale of how Native Americans were treated by the Europeans. One story told of gallons of bloodshed, torture, enslavement, and overworked Indians, while the other one told of glorified Europeans here to help their fellow man. Even though, both stories had their differences; they do tell of a similar time in which explorers reach the New World and start to establish colonies. The explorers also tried to convert the Indian tribes to Christianity.…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    They say that history is told from the perspective of the conqueror, but for two renowned philosophers, history in general was formed because of certain factors. These philosophers are Karl Marx and John Stuart Mill.…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ah531

    • 3543 Words
    • 15 Pages

    History is a chronological record of events that have come to pass. For many of us the study of history and how individuals managed to live their lives in the old days has become unimaginable, especially in today’s technologically advanced society. It’s comical to witness the younger generation display a sense of awe at events that you and I experienced as normal everyday events, such things as turning the television channels manually, or making a phone call by using a pay phone, or even writing a letter to a love one and waiting up to a couple of weeks for a response. These insignificant events may not mean much to the new generations, but it means a lot to…

    • 3543 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. “The opponents of the annexation of Texas and the Mexican War attacked slavery as the root cause of expansion, but in fact it was no more important than other causes.” Assess the validity of this statement, using the documents and your knowledge of U.S. history from 1820-1860 to support your answer.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    History is something we constantly refer to progress ourselves as humans, we learn from our mistakes and continue to strive from our successes. But who is to say what is a horrible mistake or a courageous act of valor? That which was documented about what happened so long ago, was done by a person who spread the story or wrote it down from their perspective. Howard Zinn’s argument that there is no such thing as impartial history clearly illustrates that when history is recorded there is always two sides to the story, that things are either left out or kept in to sway the reader to one side or the other. “Everyone is biased, whether they know it or not, in possessing fundamental goals, purposes and ends.” (Zinn, Use and Abuse of History,51) Not only can history be recorded partially but also it can be preached partially. By that I mean that in today’s society many things are censored, not published or not publicized. If they don’t share a view that the government doesn’t like, that a publisher knows will not sell a book or that will cause negative controversy the history probably won’t make it to the eyes of the public. (Use and Abuse of History,62). History is partial because no matter who tells it, all the details cannot be accounted for, things are left out or over emphasized to prove a point or show a certain view.…

    • 2080 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article I chose to critique was Women's Role in the American West by T. A. Larson. One main argument presented was that women’s roles in the West were often ignored in most writings during the late 1800’s. Larson stated that women of the West were treated as if they were of small significance, judging by the little attention they received from historians. Such examples of this were shown throughout the article from sources such as John A. Hawgood's America's Western Frontier, LeRoy R. Hafen and Carl Coke Rister’s edition of Western America (2nd ed., 1950), and Jackson Turner’s famous essay “The Significance of the Frontier in American History.” These historians devoted very little attention to women in their writings, usually only one…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Turner Thesis is a significant article that was presented in 1893 to inform why the American frontier is important to the development of American history. Frederick Jackson Turner, point of view on America, is that the U.S. is exceptional from other countries due to the fact of westward expansion. For example, he believes the frontier gave new opportunities for the U.S. to improved and become more superior, as a result of the manifest destiny and American settlers restarting from the beginning. In addition, he implies that the free land, cause Americans to evolve and adapt to the new environment, and therefore a better democracy, individualism, civilized, and society was formed. He states that expanding to the west, American settlers became…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Like a physicist’s pursuit of a unified theory to explain the universe, a historian searches for a theory that can explain all parts of history without being subject to biases of time, date, and location. I would give this chapter a 9/10 rating; by using examples not from Jacksonian-age America, but from specific historians, authors Davidson and Lytle profoundly demonstrate how theories are merely hypotheses that cannot become laws until they are proved time and time again that they are true. Like Einstein’s Theory of Relativity, a historical theory cannot be proven wrong until it a specific example is found where the theory does not work. What we saw with Turner’s frontier thesis was a theory that did not work, so historians from 1893 to now have spent their lives testing their own theories based off of the weaknesses in Turner’s. “Jackson’s Frontier—and Turner’s” was a great model of how a historian’s theory can be impacted by the influences of the times they live in, and how a unified historical theory can not be achieved like a scientific one may be because no two humans think the same; consequently, no historical event can be repeated in the same way a scientist demonstrates an experiment in the lab—history must be intensely discussed and researched, and theories must be made,…

    • 2324 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to the historians, by looking at things that have already happened, Americans can learn a lot about which actions made things better versus which actions made things worse, and can then plan their own actions accordingly.…

    • 238 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people make it in history but not many people make history. James Madison made history. Madison was responsible for the Monroe Doctrine, the Spanish Florida purchase, he also served as an ambassador for in France and Britain for the United States, most importantly he served as the fifth president of the United States.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The exploration of the Great Northwest produced some of the most heroic figures in our history” (MRL,22). The book fails to mention the heinous acts committed by many of the “heroes” of the nation in the name of “civilizing” the West. History is filled with people doing things “for the good of their country”. For example, it is easy to point out our founding fathers going to war with Great Britain to grant us freedom. It is almost even easier to point out that when Hitler started World War II, he was doing it “for the good of his country”. In the successes and failures of these undertakings, there is a certain amount of pride that individuals hold when discussing the exploration of the “Great Northwest”. By looking at various historical examples, it is clear that nationalism played a gigantic role in the exploration of the West.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paul Cohen writes in his book A History of Three Keys that there are three different kinds of historical consciousness; history as an event, written by professional historians, history as an experience, based on people who were alive and involved with the actual event, and history as a myth, a manipulated past to serve in today’s world. This is the only way history is written according to Cohen, three distinct and very different forms of history. He argues them while explaining the events of the Boxer rebellion in China. Cohen argues that the three forms are very different in their very nature and have no bearing on each other. History as a myth has a direct purpose. Cohen writes, “When good historians write history, their primary objective is to construct, on the basis of the evidence available, as accurate and truthful an understanding of the past as possible. Mythologizers, in a sense, do the reverse” (pg.213). I’d like to argue that although these forms of historical consciousness have their differences, they have a distinct bearing upon each other and are greatly intertwined. I’d say that historians and people with direct experience to an event distort history as greatly as mythologizers do.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays