Leadership Effectiveness
Leadership, Emotional Intelligence and Employee Engagement: Creating a Psychologically Healthy Workplace
Kenneth Nowack, Ph.D. Envisia Learning ken@envisialearning.com www.envisialearning.com What is Emotional Intelligence? The most widely accepted model of emotional intelligence (EI) has been influenced by several scientists and researchers. Sternberg’s (2003) theory of multiple intelligences suggests that interpersonal and intrapersonal intelligence are unique and different from the mathematical and logical type recognized today as "IQ" or general intelligence. Peter Salovey and John Mayer first proposed their own theory of EI in 1990 and Reuven Bar-On (1988) has placed EI in the context of personality, health and well-being. Daniel Goleman (1998) reformulated EI in terms of a theory of organizational and job performance. All these models, however, share a common core of basic concepts including Self-Awareness, Self-Management, Social Awareness, and Relationship Management. The Consortium for Research on Emotional Intelligence in Organizations (www.eiconsortium.org) is a useful website that serves as a resource portal on the topic of emotional intelligence including information on measures, current findings and EI resources. Research on EI and Performance A growing research literature suggests that EI may play a far more important role in career success and job performance than general intelligence (cognitive ability). A recent meta-analysis of 69 independent studies explored the predictive validity of emotional intelligence with diverse job performance outcomes (Van Rooy & Viswesvaran, 2004). Results suggested diverse measures of EI correlated .23 with job performance (k=19, N=4158) and .22 with general mental ability. These correlations suggest that EI can be considered a moderate predictor of job performance and success, relative to other types of personnel selection techniques including interviews, personality inventories and assessment centers. Other recent
Kenneth Nowack, Ph.D. Envisia Learning ken@envisialearning.com www.envisialearning.com What is Emotional Intelligence? The most widely accepted model of emotional intelligence (EI) has been influenced by several scientists and researchers. Sternberg’s (2003) theory of multiple intelligences suggests that interpersonal and intrapersonal intelligence are unique and different from the mathematical and logical type recognized today as "IQ" or general intelligence. Peter Salovey and John Mayer first proposed their own theory of EI in 1990 and Reuven Bar-On (1988) has placed EI in the context of personality, health and well-being. Daniel Goleman (1998) reformulated EI in terms of a theory of organizational and job performance. All these models, however, share a common core of basic concepts including Self-Awareness, Self-Management, Social Awareness, and Relationship Management. The Consortium for Research on Emotional Intelligence in Organizations (www.eiconsortium.org) is a useful website that serves as a resource portal on the topic of emotional intelligence including information on measures, current findings and EI resources. Research on EI and Performance A growing research literature suggests that EI may play a far more important role in career success and job performance than general intelligence (cognitive ability). A recent meta-analysis of 69 independent studies explored the predictive validity of emotional intelligence with diverse job performance outcomes (Van Rooy & Viswesvaran, 2004). Results suggested diverse measures of EI correlated .23 with job performance (k=19, N=4158) and .22 with general mental ability. These correlations suggest that EI can be considered a moderate predictor of job performance and success, relative to other types of personnel selection techniques including interviews, personality inventories and assessment centers. Other recent
References: Bar-On, R. (1988). The development of an operational concept of psychological wellbeing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rhodes University, South Africa. Dolbier, C., Webster, J., McCalister, K., Mallon, S. & Steninhardt, M. (2004). Reliability and validity of a single-item measure of job satisfaction. American Journal of Health Promotion. 19 (3), 194-198. Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F, Vandenberghe, C.; Sucharski, L., Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology. 87(3), Jun 2002, 565-573. Gilbreath, B. & Benson, P. (2004). The contribution of supervisor behaviour to employee psychological well-being. Work and Stress, 18, 255-266. Goleman, D. (1998). What makes a leader? Harvard Business Review, NovemberDecember. Harter, J., Schmidt, F. & Hayes, T. (2002). Business unit relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement and business outcomes: A metaanalysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 268.279. Levinson, H. (1965). Reciprocation: The relationship between man and organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 9, 370-390. Mayer, J.D., Salovey, P., and Caruso, D. (2000). Competing models of emotional intelligence. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence, second edition (pp. 396-420). New York: Cambridge University Press, (2000). Pfeffer, J. (1998). The human equation Building profits by putting people first. Boston: MA. Harvard Business School Press. Ribelin, P. (2003). Retention reflects leadership style. Nursing Management, 34(8), 1819 Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (2001). Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 825-836. Sheridan, J. & Vredenburgh, D. (1978). Usefulness of leadership behavior and social power variables in predicting job tension performance, and turnover of nursing employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 89-95. Sternberg, R. J. (2003). A broad view of intelligence: The theory of successful intelligence. Consulting Psychology Journal, 55, 139-154. 11 Sy, T., Côté, S., & Saavedra, R. (2005). The Contagious Leader: Impact of the Leader 's Mood on the Mood of Group Members, Group Affective Tone, and Group Processes. Journal of Applied Psychology. 90, 295-305. Training and Development Journal (April 2005). Wanting to keep employees happy? Offer learning and development, 26, p. 18. Van Rooy, D. L. & Viswesvaran, C. (2004). Emotional intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation of predictive validity and nomological net. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(1), 71-95. Wanus, J., Reichers, A, & Hurdy, M. (1997). Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures? Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 247-252. Work and Family Newsbrief (199). Fortune’s “100 Best” have cultures of trust and pride. Feb, 1999a:1 12 Appendix A Leadership Effectiveness Index Questions (1=Strongly Agree, 2=Agree, 3= Neither Agree nor Disagree, 4=Disagree, 5=Strongly Disagree 1. My manager/supervisor demonstrates competence in his or her job. 2. My manager/supervisor treats everyone fairly (i.e., plays no favorites). 3. My manager/supervisor creates a motivating and supportive work climate. 4. My manager/supervisor represents my needs, ideas and suggestions to his/her manager. 5. My manager/supervisor takes an interest in my professional growth and development. 6. My manager/supervisor involves me in decision making, problem solving and planning processes. 7. My manager/supervisor creates a high performance and collaborative work team. 8. I have the opportunity to interact with Management above my immediate supervisor. 1 Internal Consistency Reliability (alpha) = .91) 13