Preview

Advantages of Monarchy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
785 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Advantages of Monarchy
Advantages of Monarchy Patriotism:
Monarchs, by their very nature, are more patriotic than either Prime Ministers or Presidents. They hold great affection for their respective countries: a Prime Minister or President may be at the same post in other countries but Monarchs never have this conflict of interest. So, fundamentally, it is in the interest of any monarch to work towards greater patriotism. Every monarch makes a considerable contribution in the building of his or her nation. One who contributes or invests in anything has more affection for the result - and thus Monarchs love their countries. So Monarchy serves the interest of patriotism far better than a Republican system. Civilization :
World history proves that the civilization of any country is built by the monarchy; It is difficult to imagine civilization growing in India without the influence of Muhgal Emperors Ashok and Akbar. Whether the Great Wall of China or the Pyramids of Egypt, Monarchy builds great things. There is no civilization living today which did not originate in the work and effort of Monarchy. Thus, Monarchy is a force for civilisation.
Conversely, Republics are founded upon destruction. They are established following the deaths of thousands of people. The destruction of Monarchy in Cambodia resulted in the death of 1.7 million people. The existing unrest in Iran, Iraq, Serbia, Kosovo, Afghanistan, throughout the former Soviet Union and the African Continent is due to the destruction of monarchy.* Qualification :
Monarchs are generally born to be Monarchs. They are born in the palace, which becomes both a home and a school. They are trained for good governance, taught to be polite, calm, patient, obedient and helpful and hence a healthy lifestyle is established. Eventually a monarch becomes mature enough to rule the nation, even at a young age.
By contrast, Prime Ministers and Presidents start their political activities from a certain age, and end their careers while

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Joseph Stalin Dbq Analysis

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Over the course of time, rulers are known as sovereigns who protect their empire as well as their people. They are required to sustain order, harmony as well as being content with their empire. Throughout history we have seen many leaders the good & the bad. Not all leaders were willing to listen to their people, as well as giving them what they want but some enforced their power and struck fear into their people. Rulers did many things throughout the course of history to show and acquire dominance across their empire, Louis XIV of France & Joseph Stalin of the Soviet Union are prime examples who used terror and manipulation to gain sovereignty of their empires.…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Using ancient Sparta as a case study, I would say that the Greeks did not place a lot of emphasis on monarch. In fact their perception and relationship to monarchy was very subdued .The Spartans operated a bi-monarchial system of monarchy .In essence; they did not value monarchy, in the sense that monarchy can only be practiced absolutely for it to have a true meaning.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A monarchy is a governmental system in which the head of state is a single person. The first ruler of Rome and the founder of Rome is Romulus. During this time period Rome’s power was passed down by blood. This is one of the reasons why monarchies fell. Slaves, and other lower class citizens revolted at the fact that they couldn’t…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A monarchial king gets its crown passed down by the king before him. “Powhatan was a leader who got his power from war, marriage and trade of goods” (Townsend). Powhatan was a leader who protected his tribes by going into war when there was a threat from newcomers or neighbors. A Monarchial king would do the same to protect his people from enemies. Powhatan welcomed newcomers only if the newcomers would greet him with goods and would trade while living in the same land. A monarchial kings were more aggressive towards newcomers they would go into war to set boundaries of their land that was not shareable to…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One reason being the fact that monarchs are more worried about the benefit of their county. A president for example, may have conflict of interest, whereas a monarch most likely will not. Furthermore, with a democratic republic, issues must go through a process which cannot be quickly achieved. A king or queen however, can make decisions and put them into effect with minor delay, if any. Another benefit of monarchy is they will not become corrupt because they have not made a commitment to any groups that needs to be fulfilled. They are above the influence of any political…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Durning the Western Civilization, Kings and Queens had the power to control the economy. The Kings and Queens main focus on being a royalty authority is by having different views on how you could control the economy by, what can Kings due and Queens have, what restrictions can the King and Queen have, and what are the obligations. These factors allow the King and Queen to gain power by having…

    • 71 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hello my fellow ambassadors I will inform you on the pros and cons of democracy and monarchy.I will also explain what government is better for my country.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Despite the name, the power of the monarchy is limited by the necessity to have landed aristocracy, to a certain extent. Noble, providing political and military support for the monarchy dependent on the monarchy, yet also, at times, can be a challenge to its authority.…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The role of monarch gets passed down through generation. For example Order of Succession to the British Throne - Who will be next explained, the eldest child of the monarch is the heir.( Mandy Barrow) In fact who will be the next monarch is not determined by a vote but by birth. Further evidence states, the heir can pass on the role of monarch to his son without being king.(Order of Succession to the British Throne-Who will be next-Mandy Barrow). Therefore Queen Elizabeth's heir might never even be monarch only the prince of wales with his son being the next king instead. As a result, the royal family has a say in who the next monarch will be.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, power corrupts people. The monarch lends its powers to the elected politicians, as long as they act within the Constitution. In the event that the elected politicians succumb to corruption, and/or disobey the Constitution, the monarch is able to act as a safeguard and take away that authority that was given to them in the first place. Canada’s armed forces and naval vessels swear allegiance to the monarch, which also helps protect the people, in the act of corruption. Constitutional monarchy also helps act as a symbol to Canadians, and it already appears throughout national life. The Queen’s image…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Everyone has different opinions on what works and what doesn’t. There are problems that come up between different people, different cultures, and different religions. When it comes down to the way things worked in Ancient History, one thing was always the same; there is only one type of government, which are monarchies. Back then, wars were easily started and people were always questioning the way they did things. So then you’d think that someone would have a government aside from a monarchy. The thing is though, that that was impossible.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Keeping the monarchy in a democratic society, is the same as using a quill in a school filled with pencils. Despite an immense amount of progress involving the Canadian government, there is an extensive problem disturbing the system. The constitutional monarchy puts a figurehead as the highest position and representative of our Country. As stated in the constitution, our Queen’s power is entrusted to the Prime Minister and other elected figures, which makes the democracy overpower the monarchy (“The Monarchy of Canada 4). Along with going against the regulations that are placed over the other members of the government, royalty prevents growth, new ideas and denies the citizen’s power to choice their own leader.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another reason why the overthrow of the monarchy was good was because it ultimately it led up to the annexation of Hawaii to the US. When we became a U.S. territory Hawaii improved. Hawaii gained a sewer system, great fortunes were made by the industry people like the sugar and pineapple plantation owners, and also the real estate business boomed. A very important thing that happen when we became the 50th state of the U.S. was that America extended the bill of rights which gave women the right to vote. Before in the monarchy only 21 year old white male that could read and write English could vote. This gave women and men and the Hawaiian people more rights.…

    • 722 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    European History

    • 2402 Words
    • 8 Pages

    absolute monarchy is an illegitimate form of government because it infringes on the natural rights to life and liberty that everyone is born with.…

    • 2402 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Canadian Monarchy

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It provides legal foundations for the structure of government an ministerial accountability. It also protects rule of law and rights and freedoms, as it was based on that principle. That is what democracy is, so the Crown protecting that crucial part of democracy makes it stronger rather than undermining it. Historically, the Crown celebrates British heritage which implemented parliamentary democracy in the first place. It also represents the common interests of the people which is another key feature in any democracy. The crown affects everything in one’s day-to-day life from how people are employed, to property holding, to court cases, all of this is…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays