events would reveal poor quality of care and lack of awareness for patient safety that Nightingale hospital provides to its patients. A readiness review was conducted of Nightingale Hospital’s Universal Protocol in preparation for a Joint Commission audit. The Joint Commission standards that were a part of this review consist of: UP.01.01.01; Conduct a pre-procedure verification process‚ UP.01.02.01; Mark the procedure site‚ and UP.01.03.01; A time-out is performed before the procedure. Nightingale
Premium Joint Commission Hospital Hospital accreditation
AFT Task 1 AFT2 Accreditation Audit July 5‚ 2015 Western Governor’s University Table of Contents Compliance Status……...…………………………………………………………………..…….3 Plan for Compliance………………………..………………………………………………….....3 Justification…………………………………………………………………………..…………...4 Source………………………………………………………………………………………..……5 Compliance Status PC .01.01.07 Pain is assessed in all patients (The Joint Commission‚ 2013) Finding: In outpatient rehabilitation‚ the initial assessment of pain does not indicate
Premium Pain Hospital
found on our state audits. As always‚ our goal is for 100% compliance in all survey areas as even a 1% deficiency brings the potential for patient injury or death and for increased hospital operating costs. On our last Joint Commission survey‚ four priority focus areas were identified: information management‚ medication management‚ communication and infection control. In order to address any deficiencies in each of these areas and in preparation for our next Joint Commission audit in a year’s time
Premium Hospital accreditation Joint Commission Adverse drug reaction
Running head: ACCREDITATION AUDIT CASE STUDY/ TRACER PATIENT TASK Accreditation Audit Case Study/ Tracer Patient Task III Crystal Shanaman WGU Accreditation Audit Case Study/ Tracer Patient Task III A1. At Nightingale Community Hospital‚ our value regarding safety is “we believe that excellence begins with providing a safe environment. We put our patients first as we seek to exceed the expectations of our customers with superior service‚ outstanding clinical care
Premium Hospital Health care Patient
Executive Summary Even though Nightingale Hospital has a very detailed Site Identification and Verification Protocol‚ some areas do not meet JHACO’s standards. Updating the Universal Protocol and Preprocedure Hand-Off Check sheet will not only bring the facility into compliance but may eliminate any potential failure in communication between patient‚ caregiver and provider. Areas that require further documentation will be on the following Elements of Performance: A. Compliance Status UP.01
Premium Health care provider Patient Joint Commission
BACP ACCREDITATION CASE List of contents Section Topic 1. The agency & its Organisation 2. Case Study The Agency and its Organisation I currently counsel for Haven Counselling in the centre of Wigan. The service was established in and is funded by donations‚ charity applications etc. It is situated and a part of the Queens Hall Methodist Church. It was established in 2000 to provide general counselling but
Premium Hand washing Time Empathy
Chapter 4 Legal Liability for auditors 4-1. Understand litigious environment‚ which CPAs practice According to Google dictionary‚ litigious environment means a controversial environment. Where a simple mishaps can end up in a heavy lawsuit. Under common law‚ audit professionals have the responsibility to their client to fulfill their agreed on contracts. However‚ if one audit fails to fulfill their contract‚ not only they have to take responsibility to their clients but in some circumstances
Free Auditor's report Auditing Legal terms
Joint Commission Accreditation Audit Preparation Compliance Status for “Communication” Priority Focus Area Executive Summary In preparation for the next Joint Commission Accreditation Audit‚ Nightingale Community Hospital is assessing the compliance status of each of the Joint Commission’s Priority Focus Areas (PFAs). This Assessment covers the “Communication” Joint Commission PFA. For the previous Joint Commission audit‚ there were no findings associated with this standard. Since The Hospital
Premium
|SECTION: |EFFECTIVE DATE: October 1‚ 2006 | |SUBJECT: |PAGE 1 of 8 | |Proactive Risk Assessment Policy | | Scope: This policy applies to all direct and indirect
Premium Risk management Risk assessment Assessment
Legal and Ethical Issues to using business information LEGAL ISSUES ARE VARIOUS ITEMS OF LEGISLATION THAT PROTECTS THE USE OF BUSINESS INFORMATION. DATA PROTECTION ACT 1998: Many business and shops have information about people. This act protects the information held about them to be misused. FREEDOM OF INFORMATION 2000: this act provides individuals the right to request information from a public authority. The public authority has to inform the applicant if they have the information which must
Premium Business ethics Protection Ethics