Auburn, CA 95602
Willyboy023@hotmail.com
February 13, 2012
Los Angeles Times Op-Ed
303 W. 1st St.
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Dear Editor:
I share Rifkin’s concern with how we treat animals; however, the article, “A Change of Heart about Animals” does not provide enough concrete evidence to make the claim that animals are all of a sudden more like us than we imagined. Just because a crow can make a hook or an orangutan can groom itself in front of a mirror animals does not mean that animals are more like us than we imagined. Clearly, in order to persuade us that we need to treat animals better because they are so alike us, more evidence needs to be given. Rifkin has proven nothing new and merely demonstrates the hypocrisy of his animal rights beliefs.
First, Rifkin doesn’t prove anything new about animal and human similarity. His statement, “They are more like us than we imagined, scientists are finding” is backed up with individual and single experiments that don’t prove anything. For example, just because “Elephants will often stand next to their dead kin for days, occasionally touching their bodies with their trunks” does not mean that they are closer related to a human. Any pet owner, including myself, knows that animals can experience emotion- that’s not new information.
Secondly, Rifkin’s arguments against animal experimentation are supported by scientific studies conducted through the very same animal experimentation. From the laboratory crows to the gorilla learner, to the imprisoned orangutan, Rifkin seems to support animal abuse only when he benefits from it. I understand the concern for treating animals humanely but as shown through Rifken’s use of evidence, sometimes experimentation outweighs comfort purely in the scientific strides it creates for humans and animals.
Rifkin is an animal right activist hiding behind the scientific evidence that was created by what he’s campaigning against. His opinions are hypocritical and his article lacks new evidence. Next time, please put a better article in your magazine, because this one doesn’t do the subject justice.
Sincerely,
Will Buell
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
In discussion of inhumane treatment, a controversial issue is whether animals are entitled to their rights. While some argue that only humans have rights, others contend that animals should have the same privileges as humans. The author of “A Change of Heart about Animals,” Jeremy Rifkin, claims that animals should have better treatment. Rifkin rhetorically changes one’s view on this subject without the consent of the reader. Rifkin begins by showing the animals’ human qualities, then giving a counter statement to common objections, and finally ends it by utilizing negative language. Rifkin’s expressive strategy is to note the similarities between animals and humans. Rifkin mentions Koko, a 300-pound gorilla. Koko was able to learn sign language…
- 350 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
“A Change of Heart about Animals” by Jeremy Rifkin. This article talks about how animals are so much like us. Jeremy Rifkin asserted in his September fifth letter announcing that creatures were equipped for each feeling an individual was, and requesting that all individuals augment a feeling of balance and compassion to living creatures equivalent to that they would give an alternate person. This is clearly preposterous and, in the event that you truly make a stride back and take a gander at the procedure behind the thought, unexpected.…
- 425 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
After reading the article A Change of Heart about Animals by Jeremy Rifkin . I conclude that Rifkin is really interested in the way animals feel and the research that proves animals are just like humans . He is persuading us to think that animals are just like us by giving lots of examples of animals having emotions just like humans do. There is also lots of science that leads me to believe animals are just like us. Like the studies researchers have done on pigs, they need attention to stay happy because keeping them isolated or alone will make the pig feel depressed.I feel like animals should have their own rights because they are very intelligent and some, like Koko the gorilla, can communicate with humans. Betty and Abel the…
- 262 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Jeremy Rifkin expresses his knowledge on how animals are compared to humans in his article “A change of heart about animals.” Rifkin argues that science has shown that the differences between animals and humans are less than we think. I agree that animals are very similar if not close to being on the same level as humans. Most people would assume that animals are very different from us; this could be due to the inabilities we think we have to communicate with animals.…
- 361 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
After reading “A Change of Heart about Animals”, Jeremy Rifkins argues that animals should be treated in a more humane way. I agree with Rifkins argument because I have seen animals get abuse and it should not be like that. People may say that they do not feel anything but THEY DO! It’s similar to when a humane it getting abused. Many researchers are finding that the animals are similar to us in many ways: they feel pain, suffer, and experience stress, affection, excitement, and even love. Rifkins give scientific evidence to support his argument from credible source and make his stronger.…
- 190 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Did you know that more than 50% of the fur in the United States comes from China, where there are no penalties for abusing animals, which are raised in unbearably cramped and run-down cages on fur farms? Animals should have a Bill of Rights because they have emotions, feel pain, and are being forced into painful experiments.…
- 463 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In an article on September 1st of the Los Angeles Times, Jeremy Rifkin claims animals have the same understanding and concept of emotions we humans have, and that we should treat them as our equals. This idea of his is absurd, and if you really look at it you can see, he is just another animal rights activist trying to get his voice heard.…
- 508 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Determining the rights of non-human animals and deciding how to treat them may not be a choice available to our human society. As an advocate for the rights of animals, Tom Reganʻs three main goals are to abandon the use of animals in any scientific research, discontinue all commercial animal agriculture, and to completely terminate both commercial and sport animal hunting. To support these intentions, Regan argues that every human and non-human animal possesses inherent value, which makes them all more than a physical object or vessel. He then states that possessing inherent value allows every human and non-human to have rights of their own. To further his argument, Regan claims that the any human and non-human retaining rights requires equal treatment and respect from others. To conclude his argument, Regan states that due to these reasons, non-human animals cannot be treated as resources and must be treated by humans as equals. In this paper, I object to Reganʻs third premise, which states that non-human and human animals must be treated as equals and with respect, because our communication barrier with non-human animals restricts us from determining their notion of equal treatment or respect, and that attempting to do so could…
- 990 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In the article “A Change of Heart about Animals” by Jeremy Rifkin, behavioral scientist Stephen M. Sivy poses an important question all individuals should contemplate. “If you believe in evolution by natural selection, how can you believe that feelings suddenly appeared, out of the blue, with human beings?” The human race is not significantly different to the point where we must distinguish ourselves from alternative species. Many people seem to be under the impression that animals exist solely to serve our intentions, regardless of the detrimental effects they undergo. We as humans tend to classify ourselves to be at the top of the species hierarchy due to our moral compass and superior intellect.…
- 518 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Your newspaper published an editorial “A Change of Heart about Animals” September 1, 2003 by Jeremy Rifkin, author and president of the Foundation on Economic Trends, in which Rifkin suggests that the center of the human experience is about extending concern to wider and wider realms to the species we share the world with (34). He implies throughout the article that animals like us, feel pain, experience stress, affection, excitement, and even love (33) . He claims that animals should be treated better because they experience similar emotions we do. By focusing on the ideal of extending the amount of empathy we give to animals, Jeremy Rifkin overlooks the deeper issue of how these creatures of the world feel about us because he does not consider that like them, we…
- 668 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
When it comes to animal research I feel there are to major dilemmas that arise that play a major role in how we determine the research methods as ethical or not: (1) do certain non-human species have changed consciousness and (2) to what extent do the animals suffer or experience death and how that influences their overall “well-being.” I pose these to issues because as rational, logical creatures we are capable of answering these two questions for ourselves and discuss our thoughts and feelings with one another, but we are unable to converse with or tap into the psyche of other species in a similar manner. Essential, we cannot determine with certainty if non-human species truly have a consciousness or evaluate their overall state (aside from…
- 532 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
“ Elephants will often stand next to their dead kin for days, occasionally touching their bodies with their trunks.” Rifkin states that feeling grief is the main difference between being an animal and a human. They argue about animals…
- 268 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Visualize having someone mistreat you because they don’t feel the pain they’re making you go through. As humans we are capable of letting others know when we are in pain and we are also capable of standing up for ourselves. Animals aren’t able to do that so they are treated unfairly, like if they didn’t feel any pain at all. Although many believe that animals shouldn’t be treated like humans, my goal is to convince my classmates that we should improve the way we treat animals.…
- 319 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Although much of modern day technology is focused on materialistic things rather than the issues, such as animal rights, which are more important. “A Change of heart About Animals”, by Jeremy Rifkin, is an article where he argues how animals have feelings and should have their own rights. He describes how animals have the ability to learn. What he doesn’t do is describe animals as a lower class, but as “Our fellow creatures” so he states in his article.…
- 381 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
One view of animal experimentation is how it is immoral and wrong. The center of the debate is whether animals should be used for medical research. The question that should be asked is, does the human species deserve inclusion in research over other species? Peter Singer, professor of bioethics at Princeton University, wrote: “Despite obvious differences between humans and nonhuman animals, we share with them a capacity to suffer, and this means that they, like us, have interests. If we ignore or discount their interests, simply on the grounds that they are not members of our species, the logic of our position is similar to that of the most blatant racists or sexists who think that those who belong to their race or sex have superior moral status, simply in virtue of their race or sex, and irrespective of other characteristics or qualities." Humans have shown their capability to control other species by capturing them, imprisoning them, and subjecting them to many strange experiments to see how the animals would react. The BUAV (British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection) says that the main reason…
- 1012 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays