OPPapers.com Essay Index >> American History >> Mr
We have many free term papers and essays on Mr. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
mr. "YES" POSITION THESIS Schools may be held liable for student-on-student sexual
harassment when the recipients of federal funding failed to stop a student ...
... as the laws of logic, a position summed up by ... original" or "primitive monotheism",
a thesis now widely ... A. Yes, the Discovery Institute's Center for Science and ...
... References Thesis: The practice and beliefs Confucius and ... ethically and to lose their
position if the ... resource/articles/article038.aspx?detect=yes" http://ww ...
... that all laws should operate under the thesis of "the ... and the overwhelming good they
could do while in this position. ... The answer has to be yes and no, there is ...
... Yes, it must be the case that with the consoling ... We are in somewhat the same position
after we have ... to preclude a generalisation of the thesis deduced from the ...
Submitted by syc300 on December 15, 2007
Category: American History
Words: 2748 | Pages: 11
Views: 107
Popularity Rank: 94,969
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
"YES" POSITION THESIS
Schools may be held liable for student-on-student sexual harassment when the recipients of federal funding failed to stop a student from subjecting another to sever and pervasive sexual harassment where the recipient is deliberately indifferent to the known acts of sexual harassment and the harassing student is under the school's disciplinary authority.
"NO" POSITION THESIS
Schools cannot be held liable for student-on-student harassment because to do so would weaken the balance in federal power and numerous suits against local school districts would ensue which, in cost and number, will impose serious financial burdens on the schools. Also, schools cannot be liable for student-on-student sexual harassment because the harassment itself is not a possible Title IX cause of action due to the lack of clear and unambiguous notice.
BRIEFLY STATE AS MANY FALLACIES ON THE "YES" SIDE
1. The over-confident belief that schools are capable of exercising significant control over student discipline particularly in classroom. Some schools like universities and colleges may lack direct control over students and over the context in which the harassment occurs.
2. The underestimated difficulty associated with the job of distinguishing a childish demeanor in a single incident from the behavior that would ordinarily have to have a systemic effect on the victim's access to education that Title IX is designed to protect.
3. The conceptual distinctions between actionable and un-actionable harassment, definitional guidelines to identify sexual harassment (e.g., the harassment must be sever, pervasive, and objectively offensive) are very amorphous and abstract.
4. Belief that the language of Title IX is sufficiently clear to provide the requisite notice to the states and their school districts, so they could make an informed decision as to whether to take the federal...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!