Preview

WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
811 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS
WRONGFUL
CONVICTIONS

JAMES DRISKELL

RODOLFO HOYOS
FORENSIC SCIENCE

Name: James Driskell
Year Convicted: 1991
Conviction: first degree murder
Year released: 2003

SUMMARY

James Patrick Driskell was convicted of the murder of Perry Dean Harder. Harder, age 29, was last seen outside his house in a pickup truck. His decomposed body was found three months later in a shallow grave just outside Winnipeg on Sept. 30, 1990. He had been shot three times in the chest. Driskell and Harder were jointly charged in a series of break-and-enters. Driskell said he had nothing to do with the criminal activity. But according to police Harder named him as an accomplice. Five days before the preliminary hearing into those charges, Harder disappeared. The Crown's theory was that Driskell had committed the murder in order to prevent Harder from testifying against him.

At trial the Crown presented the following evidence:

Harder was shot with a .22-calibre rifle, a type of weapon Driskell owned at one time.
Two career criminals: Reath Zanidean and John Gumieny, testified about hearing Driskell plot to kill Harder. Harder's girlfriend said he had been feeling pressure from Driskell to take the full rap on the stolen-goods charge, yet he didn't want to do so. A voice record tape between Driskell and a Crown witness, Shakiv Kara, resulted in a handful of statements that could be interpreted as admissions of guilt by Driskell. (Kara later said that much of his testimony was false and accused police of intimidating him into supporting their version.)
Hairs were found in a van once owned by Driskell, that police said was used in the murder. A RCMP expert testified that these hairs belonged to Harder. (SCIENTIFIC ASPECT)

Within a year of the trial, defense lawyers, a private detective, and The Winnipeg Sun began raising issues about the case:

Saskatchewan police had stopped investigating Zanidean in connection with a homicide in Saskatchewan shortly after he agreed to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    On October 23, 1990, James Driskell was convicted of first degree murder against his friend Perry Harder. Earlier in the year of November 1989, James had been running a “chop shop” with Perry Harder, and apparently the police had searched through the place and found stolen parts of vehicles and they were both arrested for possession of stolen property. Furthermore, on June 21, 1990, Perry and Harder were to attend court and plead guilty of the “chop shop” charges, but Perry did not attend. September 30, Perry’s body was found with two shots in the chest. The police believed that James was the one who shot Perry because it was so that he could not testify against James in the “chop shop” case and had three hair samples that matched up to Perry…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    R v Hebert Case Analysis

    • 2442 Words
    • 10 Pages

    This action violated ss. 7 and 10(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The judge excluded the statements made by Hebert to the undercover officer, and he was later acquitted of the charges. However, the Court of Appeal set aside the acquittal and ordered a new trial, concluding that the police had not violated ss. 7 and/or 10(b) of the Charter. The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, concluding that the police had violated neither Hebert’s right to counsel. For the court, the right to counsel did not disqualify the police from questioning the accused in the absence of counsel after counsel had been contacted. Furthermore, the court asserted that the right to remain silent, as a fundamental principle of justice, did not prohibit the accused being questioned by undercover police officers. As such, the court set aside Hebert’s acquittal and ordered a new trial. Hebert appealed the decision to the Supreme…

    • 2442 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The following suspects were ‘favored’ by officers who were conducting or investigating the murders: Montague John Druitt (August 15, 1857- December 31, 1888); Seweryn Klosowski aka George Chapman (December 14, 1865- April 7, 1903); Aaron Kosminski (September 11, 1865- March 24, 1919);Michael Ostrog (1833- 1904); John Pizer (1850-1897); James Thomas Sadler; and Frances Tumblety. There is a lack of real evidence to link any of these men to the murders, but they all had extreme suspicion again the investigators after the…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Minnoesota V. Ronald Riff

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In this case, the prosecuting attorney are to communications orally and also in writing. The prosecutor main goal is to prove to both the judge and jury that the defendant is in guilty. The prosecutor opening the statement of Riff did knowingly commit the crime of breaking, and burglary on September 30, 2011 between 12:10am and 12:20 am orally to the judge and jury. The incident located at the Marquette’s Market on 1234 Main St. Midtown, Minnesota 44333, which the owner of the market is known as Speedy Marquette. It the prosecutor choice to share his/her witnesses including all evidence with the defense attorney before trail begins and to present evidence against the defendant to both jury and the judge. “All witnesses in this case include: Otis Ripple, Soapy Water, Marty Martini, C. Sharp, Betty Bitty, Rusty Fender, Guido Concertino, and the arresting officer are orally examined by the prosecution, and then the defense.” (Curran, P. & Strauch, G.). When prosecutor finish presented their parts, then it’s a choice for the defense to present their part of evidence. The prosecutor has choices of whether to examine all the defense witnesses to set straight all their statements, and to make sure that the defense is being guilty. The defendant witnesses include: Red Chips, Ace Harte, Jacques, Orbedder, Vibes Blare, Sally Slick, Matilda Slick and Gigi Gig have all been questioned by their defense attorney. Now that the defense has finish point out their statement and all of the witness are being examined and crossed, and all evidence has been presented both orally and in…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jeff Wood Essay

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Three former jurors have said they feel the government’s presentation to them of a discredited psychiatrist who predicted with certainty,” Tyler said in a statement Friday. “And without evaluating Mr. Wood, that Mr. Wood would be criminally violent in the future was unfair.”…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    trial, but her face lit up when the non guilty result was read. The Mayor and Police Chief…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Steve Arey and Terry Jordan were young, inexperienced lawyers who should have never even been considered for a capital case. Judge Persin, the presiding Judge in the case, however, decided on these two gentlemen because other more experienced lawyers refused to take the case because of the huge financial sacrifice it would require. Albeit public speculation that Judge Persin's previous profession as a prosecutor had led him to heavily favor the prosecution, his decision stood. The two prosecutors who Arey and Jordan would be opposed by were Mickey McGlothlin and Tom Scott. Both prosecutors had far more experience than the defense lawyers, but that didn't stop Judge Persin from appointing Arey and Jordan to the case. It was an obvious mismatch, intentional or not, and was just the beginning of many problems that would arise for the defendant's case.…

    • 1746 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jay's testimony being everything that the State has on Adnan Syed, which, is a testimony…

    • 1477 Words
    • 1 Page
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis Tiels Trial

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    2. Riels prosecutor was trying to convince the jury that riel led the rebellion sound mindedly.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Pickton Case Analysis

    • 1835 Words
    • 8 Pages

    “Following Pickton’s conviction for murder in only six of these cases, the government of British Columbia conducted a public inquiry into police failures to investigate the disappearances in a timely manner” (Craig, 2014,pg. 4). This is mainly due to the failures of the RCMP and other municipalities on the fact that these organizations were blindsided by a serial killer who has been preying on women in the downtown eastside. With that said the missing women inquiry led by inquiry commissioner Wally Oppal outlined the pitfalls of the police in this investigation; “the police failed to take reports on missing women and act on them, the police were unable to identify the causes of these disappearances which posed significant risks to the public, there was a lack of investigative techniques employed and case management, and the police failed to co-ordinate with other agencies which was the most critical failure” (Oppal, 2012,…

    • 1835 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    During jury selection Whites attorney made sure to exclude those who supported gay rights or those he thought were gay and eventually got a jury of working-class Catholic jurors. The prosecution lead by Thomas Norman aimed to convince the jury that this murder had every aspect of first-degree murder, malice, premeditation and deliberation. Various witnesses were called to speak of Whites actuons during that day in City Hall. Rudolph Nothenberg, a deputy to Mayor Moscone, confirmed that the mayor had planned to appoint Dan Horanzey to replace White. Diane Feinstein the new Mayor of San Francisco also testified. She clamed she tried to speak to White but he ran to Milk’s office and she heard shots. The state also called Frank Falzon to the stand, one of two detectives who interviewed White. The prosecution asked if the tape was altered the…

    • 1318 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Case Of Mr. Simpson

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages

    After a close cross-examination of the witness’s testimonies, prosecutor Clark declined to present them to the jury (Hastie 197). The witness was forced to accept her uncertainty of the precise time she saw Simpson’s Bronco outside the…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Boston Marathon

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages

    beginning a man was falsely accused of being involved in the incident. He maintained his…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Justice Laws

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The prosecutor was caught up in the media and emotional hype of this case. She…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just Cuz

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Allan Schoenborn murdered his daughter and two sons in their Merritt, B.C. trailer home in April 2008, but was found not criminally responsible because of a mental disorder. He stabbed his 10-year old daughter Kaitlynne and then smothered Max, 8 and Cordon, 5 leaving their bodies to be found by their mother, Darcie Clarke.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics