OPPapers.com Essay Index >> Philosophy >> What Would Satisfactory Moral Theory Be Like?
We have many free term papers and essays on What Would Satisfactory Moral Theory Be Like?. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
What would satisfactory moral theory be like? What would satisfactory moral theory be like? Deontological moral theory is a Non-Consequentiality moral theory. While
2002 In my film analysis I will be discussing some of the fourteen principles of a satisfactory moral system and a good ethical decision. I will also discuss how
of Experience Virginia Held ?City University of New York ? When I first read Science and the Theory of Value many years ago, I was surprised and pleased to discover
This theory seems to help the traditional view of sexual morality, yet is there a satisfactory moral theory that could support a one-night stand? Deontological theories
will not - ever allow. The rights view, I believe, is rationally the most satisfactory moral theory. It surpasses all other theories in the degree to which it illuminates
Submitted by shinnrobert736 on April 20, 2008
Category: Philosophy
Words: 1238 | Pages: 5
Views: 181
Popularity Rank: 78,716
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
What would satisfactory moral theory be like?
Deontological moral theory is a Non-Consequentiality moral theory. While
Consequentiality believe the ends always justify the means, deontologists assert
That the rightness of an action is not simply dependent on maximizing the good,
If that action goes against what is considered moral. It is the inherent nature of
the act alone that determines its ethical standing. For example, imagine a
situation where there are four critical condition patients in a hospital who each
need a different organ in order to survive. Then, a healthy man comes to the
Doctor’s office for a routine check-up. According to consequentialism, not
Deontology, the doctor should and must sacrifice that one man in order to save
for others. Thus, maximizing the good. However, deontological thought contests
this way of thinking by contending that it is immoral to kill the innocent despite the
fact one would be maximizing the good. Deontologists create concrete
distinctions between what is moral right and wrong and use their morals as a
guide when making choices. Deontologists generate restrictions against
maximizing the good when it interferes with moral standards. Also, since
deontologists place a high value on the individual, in some instances it is
permissible not to maximize the good when it is detrimental to you. For
example, one does not need to impoverish oneself to the point of worthlessness
simply to satisfy one’s moral obligations. Deontology can be looked at as a
generally flexible moral theory that allows for self-interpretation but like all others
theories studied thus far, there are arguments one can make against its
reasoning.
One objection to deontological moral theory is that the theory yields only
absolutes and cannot always...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!