Preview

WK 3 Individual COURTROOM WORKGROUP

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1708 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
WK 3 Individual COURTROOM WORKGROUP
Courtroom Workgroup Paper
Eileen Ritter
CJA/204
July 7, 2014
Carlos Zuniga
Courtroom Workgroup Paper
One of the important roles a judge, a criminal prosecutor, and a criminal defense attorney will carry out is called, a “courtroom work group”. The courtroom work group interact on a daily basis by these three entities joining together to converse over matters such as if the case has probable cause to convict the offender or whether or not if there is enough evidence to go forward with a criminal trial. Normally, the prosecutor will try to persuade the defense that they do not have a case or try to talk the defense into a guilty plea or possible bail. In other words, anything they can do to speed up the process with various types of negotiations. The judge has to remain ethical and fair to see both sides of the prosecution and defense to determine if the negotiations are valid enough to go through with. Even though the judge, prosecutor, and defense attorney are the main officials of the courtroom work group, we cannot forget about other members that play a part as well. The minor (respectfully) members or other members that make up a courtroom work group are the court clerk, the bailiff, and the court reporter. The court clerk upholds all the records while the court reporter makes sure he/she transcribes the official proceedings. The bailiff helps to keep court order throughout a trial. Although I can understand how the main officers discuss the case and try to solve it without a trial, I feel that every case should be heard. The major problem with this though is time and money. In order for every offender to have a case without the prosecutor trying to convince the defense into something else, there would have to be a lot more courthouses with a lot more main officers. The only way this would ever happen is to hike up the taxes and no one wants their taxes to increase.
Although these three officers work together in coming to a conclusion, they have

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The case that is being tried is case, 82A04-8876-CV-285, Deborah White vs. John Daniels and O 'Malley 's Tavern, and is being argued before a mock U.S. District Court, in the Northern District of Indiana. The plaintiff in this case is Deborah White, and her attorneys are Amanda Babbit and Jackson Walsh. The attorneys for the defendants, Patrick Daniels and O 'Malley 's Tavern, are Benjamin Walton and Jordan Van Meter.…

    • 2181 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In other occasions court administrators, prosecutors and judges prefer to go for plea bargains to help reduce case volumes and in other cases granted time to the parties so they can prepare themselves for the case or to obtain further documentation to avoid losing time during the next hearing moving the case for a date where they might not have such big overload. Another option that the court administrators recur is to divide cases upon the crime in order to fit all short non complicated crimes in a day vs. having many complicated cases all together in one day since that would delay the case flow.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Every key player in the system should be held accountable for their decisions in regards to the accused. For example, judges should not be exempt from consequences when their rulings are inappropriate and result in social upheaval. A system of standards should be in place and after a certain number of infractions, they should be reprimanded or fired depending on the severity of the infraction. In order to avoid poor decision making due to lack of background inquiry, more interns from law schools should be employed to assist in researching the accused. Judges could then make better-informed…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I decided to attend a night traffic court session at the Ventura Courthouse. The cases ranged from seat belt violations to reckless driving. Most of the defendants appeared before the court to request more time to pay the fines associated with the tickets. I was surprised to see that very few of the people in the courthouse were pleading not guilty. Only one person showed up to defend a case with legal help from an attorney of some sort.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Prosecutorial misconduct is defined as the use of deceptive, illegal or reprehensible methods used by a prosecutor, to attempt to persuade either the court or the jury. Wrongful convictions in this country are nothing new to the criminal justice system. They are as old as the system itself, and they will continue to exist as long as the fallibility of human judgment continues.…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Courtroom Workgroup Paper

    • 740 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A courtroom workgroup in the U.S criminal justice system is an informal arrangement between a criminal prosecutor, criminal defense attorney, and the judicial officer. The courtroom working group seeks to bring justice to all. It ensures that all parties are accorded due fairness and equal opportunity regardless of gender, race, age, religious affiliation nor any other factor. They also see to it that trials are completed successfully. These individuals are grouped into two categories. These are the professionals and the outsiders. Professionals are the court officers such as the judges, attorneys, public defenders, defense attorneys and court reporters. I believe that the criminal prosecutor, defense attorney, and a judicial officer make up the most common courtroom work group. The daily interaction of this group is to make sure that rules are being followed in each group. Also making sure it is given in a timely fashion. The courtroom work group needs to work in order to offer plea bargains and select jurors.…

    • 740 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Plea Bargaining Cases

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The United States court system runs smoothly due to plea bargaining because they push cases through without trial. Trials can take weeks and even months before they have a verdict. With ninety percent of cases being plea bargained it keeps court cases moving along. The United States court system is like a conveyer belt and plea bargaining is what keeps the conveyer belt moving so thing do not get backed up. Plea bargaining also benefits defendants by giving them a choice to plead guilty and take a lesser charge by giving up their right to a trial (Alschuler, 1968, p. 4). For those who the evidence clearly shows they are guilty they can chose a plea bargaining and get less time without wasting the court's time. Defendants who have families they need to support and are guilty of a crime can take a plea bargaining and can serve less time so they can get back to supporting their families sooner. Individuals can also give up their right to a trial by their peers in exchange for a guilty plea of a less serious offense or lesser charges making their criminal record better. They are minor first offenses where people can go without hiring a lawyer and instead accept a plea bargain and avoid going trial and paying for a lawyer. Many people make mistakes early in their life and plea bargains give those people a chance to reduce time served or charges by admitting to what they…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree with you. Some crimes can be handled differently depending how the offense is classified “Many states encourage diversion programs that remove less serious criminal matters from the full” (How Courts Work, n.d., para. 4) Plea bargaining can be accepted for reasons like, defendants avoiding the time in court. Also, the prosecutor can dedicate time to other cases. A valid approach is the agreement of both part on the case “obviously both sides have to agree before one comes to pass”. (How Courts Work, n.d., para. 2) As you mention, that should not be applied in the major…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Also due to the lack of meeting time, court appointed attorneys are more likely to push for a plea deal than to take the case to trial. Plea deals are also another way that the poor have unequal access to justice. Because court appointed attorneys have massive workloads and little time to meet with their clients, most of their cases end with a plea deal. A plea deal, to me, is…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kathryn’s duty to do justice as the prosecutor, also applies during plea bargaining, whereby, a persons guilt must be established based on proof beyond a reasonable doubt. As such, the prosecutor’s primary objective “is to avoid punishing an innocent person. Because a prosecutor is obligated to act in all stages in the criminal justice process consistently with the sovereign's view that it is more important to avoid punishing the innocent, this principle applies to a prosecutor's efforts in resolving cases pre-trial” (Stern 1034). Regardless of how confident the prosecutor is of the defendant’s guilt, the prosecutor must ensure he does not offer a plea bargain that would result in an innocent individual to plead guilty as such an offer would subordinate the purpose of preventing an innocent individual from being punished to that of punishing a guilty individual, “thereby failing to strike the balance that justice requires” (Stern 1035). O’Hear suggests that a defendant should have the opportunity to convey their side of the story in order for the defendant to avoid getting convicted if they are innocent. It would also be beneficial to enhance the defendants perceptions of procedural justice by developing an objective criteria in order to direct plea negotiations and explain the prosecutors…

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The most important source of law is the United States Constitution. The United States Constitution is the foundation of both federal and state laws. The United States Constitution also protects us the people, particularly the first ten amendments known as the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights was ratified on December 15, 1791. One amendment that I feel is most relevant today in criminal law is Amendment VI Right to Speedy Trial, Confrontation of Witnesses. According to (Mount, 2011) Amendment VI states “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence”. Tom Head wrote (Head, 2012) “The "speedy trial" clause is intended to prevent long-term incarceration and detention without trial--which amounts to a prison sentence without a guilty verdict”. If you were to prolong a trial, over time evidence can become lost, witnesses could and would forget facts, and an innocent person could end up doing time for a crime he did not commit. It is in the best interest of both the prosecution and the defense to have a speedy trial so that the proper facts and evidence can stay fresh. The right to a public trial assures the defendant that a fair hearing can take place. Allowing the public to view a trial helps reduce the risk of an unfair or a bias trial. An impartial jury of the state would be a jury that is not bias and comes from the state and district of which the crime took place. Head (Head, 2012) stated “Not only must jury members not have…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The majorities of individuals charged with a crime, whether state or federal never see the inside of a courtroom, and if they do see a courtroom it is not in the context that one would think. The defendant is not sitting in a courtroom full of spectators watching as attorneys argue the guilt or innocence of the defendant to twelve jurors who will eventually decide their fate. This perception of a courtroom has been molded into the minds of Americans through television. The real picture of how the majority of cases are tried is not in a courtroom, but a small room with the prosecutor who pushes the defendant to take a plea bargain. Plea bargaining is a process that uses negotiation to entice the defendant into pleading guilty to a lesser charge or only one of several charges without going to trial, which is a violation…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Traditional courts on the other hand have little to no contact with each offender, which results in little to no supervision and control over the offender decisions outside the court…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    plea bargain

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When it comes to the prosecutor they are the one who would off the plea bargains. The plea bargain helps them go through a case faster due to the caseload they are giving, but it also helps them be able to use less resources so they can use the resources on the bigger case that will need them. It also helps with the workroom group so there is less conflict (Siegel, L. J., Schmalleger, F., & Worrall, J. L. 2011).…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are many parts of the courtroom work group professionals who successfully pursuit justice and the process of convicting a criminal. The courtroom work group has a major role in convicting and finalizing a case. In the courtroom work group, there are three groups of people that hold the entire courtroom together. Without the work group, the courtroom would not flow, and coming to a conclusion to the case would not be as easy. The work group is made up of the Judge, the Defense Attorney, Public Defender, Court Recorders, and the Prosecutor Attorney. Which all are part of the courtroom work group which they work together to reach a decision, in the case by interacting among themselves and who’s involved an implicit recognition and rule of civility, cooperation, and sharing their goals. There are many roles in the work group, and if they are not all followed through with then the results could be different than what they should be. In this paper, we will look at the roles of the prosecutor, how the criminal justice funnel effects the courtroom work group and what will help eliminate the funnel and reduce the backlog of cases.…

    • 1422 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays