OPPapers.com Essay Index >> Social Issues >> Why Muslim Rebel
We have many free term papers and essays on Why Muslim Rebel. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
Why Muslim Rebel. In the book “Why Muslims Rebel: Chapter five, Ideology
and Anti-civilian Violence, the author Mohammed M. Hafez ...
... He is of Muslim faith and that wasn’t as well accepted as it is today. Dee is also
a rebel in that way too. Being Muslim now it’s not that big of a deal. ...
... of traditional authority gave him an aura of being scrappy and the image of the
permanent rebel. For an impoverished and disempowered Muslim minority, this ...
... pressure inflicted by the feminists who urge them to rebel against this ... place are
completely ignored or disregarded.8 Discrimination against Muslim women who ...
... control of India. They smashed a Muslim temple at Ayodhya, and Sikh and Tamil
rebel groups rebel against their authority. What is even ...
Submitted by kamau25 on April 24, 2007
Category: Social Issues
Words: 839 | Pages: 4
Views: 138
Popularity Rank: 74,788
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
In the book “Why Muslims Rebel: Chapter five, Ideology and Anti-civilian Violence, the author Mohammed M. Hafez argues that patterns of anti-civilian violence are often a product of anti-system ideological frames that develop under condition of repression and within the context of exclusive mobilization structures.” Anti-system frames facilitate what social psychological call “moral disengagement, “which deactivates self sanctioning norms against brutality and values anti-civilian violence a permissible indeed legitimate, mode of contention (Bandura 1998, 1999; Bandura et. al. 1996, 2001) (Hafez 155 ,156). In this chapter Hafez explains ethical justification of violence, advantageous comparison and displacement of responsibility.
By examining the way various Islamic groups justify their actions or violence against civilians. He starts with an explanation of ideological frames, “ideological frames refer to the conscious strategic efforts by groups of people to fashion shared understandings of the world and themselves that legitimate and motivate collective action (McAdam et al 1996;6) (Hafez 156). Hafez writes, “Abortion is murder…[this] is an example of an ideological frame [that would be] used by antiabortion activists in the United States to motivate protest against abortion clinics. Such framing accentuate the perceived nefariousness of abortion and suggests the need for need sanctions against it” (Hunt et al 1994) (Hafez 156).
It is my understanding that in some ideological frames they are derived from either a group or individuals’ personal feelings about the states political system and their belief that things are corrupt in some manner. As a result neither side would be able to come to an agreement that would be beneficial to both sides. Hafez poses the question “how do anti-system frames contribute to violence against civilians?” he replies “ they do so through a gradual process of deactivating self inhibitory moral codes against...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!