OPPapers.com Essay Index >> Philosophy >> Web Porn At Work
We have many free term papers and essays on Web Porn At Work. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
Web Porn at Work When faced with moral issues in every facet of life, individuals often rely on normative theories for guidance in their decision-making process
customers. Software engineer Matt Cutis (center), aka "Porn Cookie Guy," takes questions from Web publishers eager to have their sites ranked higher in Google search
cannot surf the web for porn. However, this is what troubles me. I need the internet for school work, shopping, information, etc. Even though I can drive to school
for specific reasons. Those protect the people before the damage to say a young child posing for porn can be done. Those people that would be trying to regulate the
for specific reasons. Those protect the people before the damage to say a young child posing for porn can be done. Those people that would be trying to regulate the
Submitted by acwng on June 26, 2008
Category: Philosophy
Words: 886 | Pages: 4
Views: 211
Popularity Rank: 69,569
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
When faced with moral issues in every facet of life, individuals often rely on normative theories for guidance in their decision-making process and its subsequent justification. In the case of Rayburn Unlimited, Al Smetana, the founding president, discovers that Craig Lindley, the associate vice-president and an old-time friend, has been using the company’s computer network extensively for web pornography. At the current juncture, Al is faced with the decision of how to resolve the situation with Craig, debating between the spectrum of upholding the firm’s commitment to integrity, the importance of the intrinsic worth of each individual, and the personal friendship with Craig. This decision by Al falls into the categorization of a moral issue due to two reasons: Firstly, it involves an analysis of harms and benefits. That is, this decision has the potential to leave individuals involved in a better or worse position after the decision is made. Secondly, throughout the decision-making process, Al utilizes moral standards, which takes priority over both the self interest of Al or Craig. With that in mind, let’s analyze the decision “What should Al do with Craig” using two popular normative theories, Utilitarianism and Kantianism.
Using the theory of Utilitarianism, Al should determine all possible alternatives, and then implement the alternative that creates the most happiness (or the least unhappiness) for all parties involved. In this analysis, we will consider 3 different alternatives: (1) Fire Craig to uphold firm values, (2) Move on as if nothing happened, and (3) Offer counseling services to Craig to overcome his addiction, and let him go if he continues to violate the computer usage policy. Let’s begin with option (1): Firm values are upheld: +5 units; Unhappiness due to Craig’s lost of employment and the potential lost of friendship: -10 units; Potential effects to Craig’s family due to his lost of employment: -25 units;...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!