OPPapers.com Essay Index >> Religion >> View On God
We have many free term papers and essays on View On God. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
Emily Dickinson: Her View Of God. Emily ... In conclusion, Emily Dickinson had a view
of God that revolved around questioning His power. However ...
View on God. ... (22) Karl Rahner sees this as Thomas's more radical view of God's
incomprehensibility ("An Investigation of the Incomprehensibility of God in St. ...
My World View. My Worldview As I was growing up I was taught to believe
in God. My mom told me everything I do God is watching me ...
... be the greatest. ? In Anselm's view, God's existence necessarily follows
from his greatness or perfection. Therefore, being that ...
... be the greatest. ? In Anselm's view, God's existence necessarily follows
from his greatness or perfection. Therefore, being that ...
Submitted by andrewsandon on October 4, 2006
Category: Religion
Words: 11067 | Pages: 45
Views: 567
Popularity Rank: 15,946
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
There are only three possible ways of proving the existence of God by means of speculative reason. All the paths leading to -this goal begin either from determinate experience... or they start from experience which is purely indeterminate ... or finally they abstract from all experience, and argue completely a priori, from mere concepts, to the existence of a supreme cause. Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, A59O/B618
Kant tells us that there are exactly three ways of proving the existence of God by speculative reason. In the first, we begin from "determinate experience and the specific constitution of the world" and ascend from there to a supreme cause. "The world presents to us so immeasurable a stage of variety, order, purposiveness, and beauty" (A622/B650) that we may infer a sublime and wise cause (A625/B654). This is the physico-theological proof or argument from design. In the second, we begin from indeterminate experience or "experience of existence in general" and proceed once again to a cause. Here it does not matter what the world is like, but only that it exists; if the cosmos consisted of nothing but a speck of dust, we would still need to posit a cause for it. This is the cosmological proof. Finally, we may bypass experience altogether and argue "completely a priori, from mere concepts." This is the ontological proof, most audacious of all, as it premises nothing about what exists. In this chapter I examine what Kant has to say about the cosmological and ontological proofs. I consider them (as Kant does) as attempts to prove the existence not of the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, but of a primordial being, whose identity with the God of religion must be a matter of further argument or faith.
A. The Ontological Argument
The version of the ontological argument Kant considers is that of Descartes, not Anselm. 1 It may be set forth as follows:
1. The ens realissimum (i.e., God) is, by definition, the being who possesses...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!