OPPapers.com Essay Index >> Philosophy >> Unjust Laws
We have many free term papers and essays on Unjust Laws. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
Unjust laws. Are we morally obliged to obey even unjust laws? ... Singer gives
two typical arguments in favor of obeying these unjust laws. ...
Just and Unjust Laws. ... Throughout his days as a leader, King showed that bringing
about understanding is the most effective way to change unjust laws. ...
king vs thoreau. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. believed civil disobedience, when enacted
for the correct reasons, was a useful tool to fight unjust laws. ...
... I do feel that one has a moral responsibility to obey just laws, but I also feel
that one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. ...
... Unjust laws exist everywhere, and you have a right and an obligation to do what
you think is right and moral. ... Are we morally obliged to obey even unjust laws? ...
Submitted by bigred13 on September 24, 2005
Category: Philosophy
Words: 1720 | Pages: 7
Views: 799
Popularity Rank: 8,306
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
Are we morally obliged to obey even unjust laws? Think about what this means. This means that laws, regardless of how unfair, unjust, or immoral they may be, must be followed with no better reason that they are the law. To the thesis that we are obliged to obey even unjust laws, I will argue that the standard objections to Civil Disobedience, given by Singer, are incorrect
To begin, however, I believe it is necessary to define an “unjust” law. According to St. Thomas Aquinas, “Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust.” (King, 3) According to Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., “An unjust law is a code that a numerical or power majority compels a minority group to obey, but does not make binding on itself.” (King, 4)
The definition I will take is a combination of these two. I define an unjust law as one that degrades human personality through the unfair suffering of a minority group at the hands of a majority group. Keep in mind that a majority can be in either power or number. A majority in number can be oppressed by a majority in power. Any law that causes a person to suffer simply because they do not agree with this majority is an incorrect and unjust law.
Singer gives two typical arguments in favor of obeying these unjust laws. I will address these arguments one at a time. The first argument says that, “By disobeying [a law] I set an example for others that may lead them to disobey too. The effect may multiply and contribute to a decline in law and order. In an extreme case, it may lead to civil war.” (Singer, 297)
I believe that, while this argument has a little merit, it is an extremely exaggerated slippery slope. It is true that people may join in disobedience, but if the law is unjust and is disobeyed within the guidelines I put forth later, people joining the disobedience would be a good thing. It would show the support of a strong minority, and may even help the minority to...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!