The Dynamics of Competition
The Dynamics of Competition
1.0 Competition: Introduction:
All companies survive in an external environment that influences their working. The external environment is the foundation of resources essential for existence. On the other hand, as the competitive dynamics in a business change, companies working in that business have to alter the method they compete for required resources. This alteration in operations is necessary for the sustained attainment of key resources. In other words, as the market place revolutionize, companies should modify their approach in order to stay alive and get competitive advantage. Vigilant environmental judgment is significant for successful organizational performance. To be successful, health care companies should have an understanding of the external environment in which they work. To sustain competitive advantage they have to be capable to foresee and react to the important changes that take place inside their environment. Successful strategic management has to aim towards positioning the company most successfully in its changing environment. In the 1960s and 1970s, competition was between organizations. In that era organizations have a tendency to put together majority of their workings and bring together their products themselves. In the 1980s and1990s organizations out-sourced a bigger part of their mechanism and assemblies, and became extensive organizations. Competition was among supply chains and supply chain management became a main organizational skill. In the 2000s, as competition turn into truly worldwide, the competitiveness of industry in any area of the globe will depend greatly on the whole company infrastructure, which will attract organizations to and keep them in any area of the earth. Competition will be among group of interconnected association that add and create value through collaboration. The alertness of individual producer depends not only on their own actions and systems but also on those of the
1.0 Competition: Introduction:
All companies survive in an external environment that influences their working. The external environment is the foundation of resources essential for existence. On the other hand, as the competitive dynamics in a business change, companies working in that business have to alter the method they compete for required resources. This alteration in operations is necessary for the sustained attainment of key resources. In other words, as the market place revolutionize, companies should modify their approach in order to stay alive and get competitive advantage. Vigilant environmental judgment is significant for successful organizational performance. To be successful, health care companies should have an understanding of the external environment in which they work. To sustain competitive advantage they have to be capable to foresee and react to the important changes that take place inside their environment. Successful strategic management has to aim towards positioning the company most successfully in its changing environment. In the 1960s and 1970s, competition was between organizations. In that era organizations have a tendency to put together majority of their workings and bring together their products themselves. In the 1980s and1990s organizations out-sourced a bigger part of their mechanism and assemblies, and became extensive organizations. Competition was among supply chains and supply chain management became a main organizational skill. In the 2000s, as competition turn into truly worldwide, the competitiveness of industry in any area of the globe will depend greatly on the whole company infrastructure, which will attract organizations to and keep them in any area of the earth. Competition will be among group of interconnected association that add and create value through collaboration. The alertness of individual producer depends not only on their own actions and systems but also on those of the
References: Achrol, R.S. (1991), “Evolution of the marketing organization: new forms for turbulent environments”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 55 No. 4, pp. 77-93. Allen, E. and Fjermestad, J. “E-Commerce Strategies: The Manufacturer Retailer Consumer Relationship,” Proceedings of the 5th Americas Conference on Information Systems, 2000. Ang, S.-H. (2008), ‘‘Competitive intensity and collaboration: impact on firm growth across technological environments’ ’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 29, pp. 1057-75. Bititci, U.M., Martinez, V., Albores, P. and Parung, J. (2004), ‘‘Creating and managing value in collaborative networks’ ’, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 34Nos 3/4, pp. 251-68.listed. Beal, R. M. and M. Yasai-Ardekani, ‘Performance Implications of Aligning CEO Functional Experiences with Competitive Strategies’, Journal of Management, Vol. 26, No. 4, 2000, pp. 733-762. Bengtsson, M. and Kock, S. (1999), “Cooperation and competition in relationship between competitors in business network”, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 178-93 Chen, F.F Cokins, G. (1996), Activity-Based Cost Management: Making it Work, Richard D. Irwin, Chicago, IL.Cooper, R. and Slagmulder, R. (1999), “Intelligent cost system design”, Strategic Finance, Vol. 80 No. 12, pp. 18-21. Glazer, R. (1991), “Marketing in an information-intensive environment: strategic implications of knowledge as an asset”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 55 No. 4, pp. 1-19. Grey, C. (2001), “Re-imagining relevance: a response to Starkey and Madan”, British Journal of Management, Vol. 12, pp. S27-S32. Guo, K.L. (2004), “Organizational and management strategies in response to US market trends”, Journal of Health Organization and Management, Vol Irons’ (Ed) Turning Strategy into action.Pergamon Press. McCarthy, E.J., Basic Marketing: A Managerial Approach, Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, 1960. Jacobsen, R. (1992), “The Austrian school of strategy”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 782-807 Johnson G, Scoles Haas-Wilson, D. and Gaynor, M. (1998), “Increasing consolidation in healthcare markets: what are the antitrust policy implications?”, Health Services Research, Vol. 33 No. 5,pp. 1403-19. Hamel, G.and Prahalad, C.K.(1989), ``Strategic intent ' ', Harvard Business Review, May-Julep. Kirzner, I Kim, E., D. Nam and J. L. Stimpert, 'The Applicability of Porter’s Generic Strategies in the Digital Age: Assumptions, Conjectures, and Suggestions ', Journal of Management, Vol. 30, No. 5, 2004, pp. 569-589. Liqin Ren, GuangyaXie, & Koos Krabbendam. (2009). Sustainable competitive advantage and marketing innovation within firms: A pragmatic approach for Chinese firms. Management Research Review, 33(1), 79-89. Lin, Y Lerro, A., Iacobone, F.A. and Schiuma, G. (2012), ‘‘Knowledge assets assessment strategies: organizational value, processes, approaches and evaluation architectures’ ’, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 563-575. Porter, M.E. (1980), Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, Free Press, New York, NY. Porter, Michael (1987). From Competitive Advantage to Corporate Strategy. Harvard Business Review May-June (3): 43–59 Porter, M Porter, M.E. (2001), “Strategy and the internet”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 79 No. 3, pp. 62-78. Porter, Michael E. (1995). Competitive advantage: Creating & sustaining superior performance. The free press, New York, USA. Pearson Prentice Hall, Sa˜ o Paulo Quelch, J.A. and Klein, L.R. (1996), “The internet and international marketing”, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 37 No. 3, pp. 60-75 Reed, Richard Spendolini, M.J., the Benchmarking Book, AMACOM, New York, NY, 1992 Schumpeter, J.A Smith, K. G., Grimm, C. & Gannon, M 1992. Dynamics of competitive strategy. London, Sage Publications. Svensson, G. (2004), ‘‘Triadic dependencies in business networks’ European Business Review, Vol. 16No 5, pp. 473-93. Schwaninger, M. (2009), “Model based management: a research agenda”, Institute of Management Discussion Paper No. 57, January. Schwaninger, M., Janovjak, M. and Ambroz, K. (2006), “Second-order intervention: enhancing organizational competence and performance”, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Vol. 23, pp. 529-45.63-76. Thomas, K.W. (1992), ‘ ‘Conflict and negotiation processes in organizations’ ’, in Dunnette, M.D. and Hough, M. (Eds), Handbook of Industrial & Organisational Psychology, 2nd ed., Vol. 3, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA, p. CA. Wright, J.P. (1979), On a Clear Day you can See General Motors: John Z. De Lorean’s Look Inside the Automotive Giant , Wright Enterprises, Grosse Pointe, MI. pp. 40-7