Free Term Papers on Texas V Johnson

OPPapers.com Essay Index >> American History >> Texas V Johnson

We have many free term papers and essays on Texas V Johnson. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.

Essays from FratFiles.com
  1. Texas V Johnson

    Texas v Johnson. Texas v Johson ... One such case, reviewed by the United States'
    supreme court in 1988, was Texas v Johnson. The case involved ...

  2. Texas V. Johnson

    Texas v. Johnson. Texas v. Johnson (1989) In 1984, following a protest march
    through the streets of Dallas, Texas against the policies ...

  3. Texas V. Johnson Case Brief

    texas v. johnson case brief. US Supreme Court TEXAS v. JOHNSON, 491 US 397 (1989)
    491 US 397 Citation: Johnson was convicted of desecration ...

  4. Texas V Johnson

    Texas v Johnson. In 1984 the Republican National Convention was held in Dallas,
    Texas. While ... speech. Texas v. Johnson December 6, 2004.

  5. Flag Burning

    ... After being arrested Mr. Johnson was convicted of setting fire to a flag during ...
    protesters; "America, the red, white, and blue, we spit on you"(Texas v. Johnson ...

View More Papers...

Texas V Johnson

Submitted by vlaurenz on December 19, 2007

Category: American History
Words: 741 | Pages: 3
Views: 138
Popularity Rank: 80,107
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)

Texas v Johson
The first amendment grants the citizens of the United States the right to speak freely, without legal persecution. Over the past 200 years since this amendment was enacted there have been hundreds of judicial cases devoted to interpreting and refining this law. One such case, reviewed by the United States' supreme court in 1988, was Texas v Johnson. The case involved Johnson's conviction of desecrating a venerated object (a Texas Statute) by burning a U.S. flag (Texas V Johnson(1989)). The importance of this case rests not only in the legality of flag burning, but also in the definition of speech. This was the primary concern of the supreme court when reviewing Texas v Johnson. Does the first amendment only pertain to spoken and written words, or can it be construed to protect other forms of expression?
During the 1984 Republican National Convention, held in Dallas, Texas, Gregory Johnson was one of approximately 100 protestors, with the stated purpose of protesting the Reagan administration as well as some of the local Dallas based corporations. The group of protesters worked their way to the City Hall, where Gregory Johnson doused an American flag in kerosene and ignited it, while protesters chanted "America, the red, white and blue, we spit on you." There was no violence, and no bystanders suffered any injury, but many were "seriously offended." Johnson was then arrested, and convicted of desecrating a venerated object, a section of the Texas Penal Code. He was sentenced to one year in prison, and fined $2,000 (Herbeck, Tedford).
Upon appeal, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals reversed Johnson's conviction. The court's decision was founded on the grounds that Johnson's act was expressive conduct, and therefore protected by the First Amendment. The court also concluded that the State could not criminally sanction flag desecration in order to preserve national unity, nor could the statute be justified as a means of...

You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!