OPPapers.com Essay Index >> Philosophy >> Socrates Phaedo
We have many free term papers and essays on Socrates Phaedo. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
Socrates Phaedo. In the Phaedo, Socrates explains, “Aren’t there, in the
case of all contraries, since they come in pairs, something ...
... George Waszczuk 9/25/2000 Wed: 6:30-9:30pm Phaedo Summary Socrates stands now before
his disciples telling them he is not afraid of dying because he says death ...
Phaedo. Phaedo is a dialogue of which Socrates attempts to demonstrate the
immortality of the rational soul. He uses four arguments ...
Phaedo examines wether the human soul is immortal or not. The Phaedo is
a story that is set on the last day of Socrates’ life. ...
Phaedo. Phaedo Philosophy is a vast field. It examines and probes many different
fields. ... Among the most revered philosophers of all time was Socrates. ...
Submitted by dmb5070 on May 21, 2008
Category: Philosophy
Words: 1519 | Pages: 7
Views: 36
Popularity Rank: 109,531
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
In the Phaedo, Socrates explains, “Aren’t there, in the case of all contraries, since they come in pairs, something like two becomings between them, from one to the other, and, again, from the other back to the first” (71b). Socrates argues that everything comes from its opposite, and that nothing can die without being alive, while nothing can be alive without having being dead before. This statement is partially true in that some things do come from their opposites, and that everything has to be alive before it is dead. On the other hand, Socrates’ statement is partially false because everything does not need to be dead before it is alive.
While there are certainly many things in this world that come from their opposite, there are also many things that do not come from their opposite. For instance, a person does not need to hate someone before they love them, or love someone before they hate them. This can be true some of the time, but it is not necessary to have love or hate for an individual before one can feel the opposite, because emotions are something that can be acquired out of nowhere and are incurred through one’s actions, attitudes, perceptions, and thoughts. Furthermore, there are times when someone can start playing a sport and immediately be good at it. In this sense a person does not have to be bad at the sport before they are good at it because one can just have natural talent. While a person, particularly a young child, can start out being bad at a sport because they do not understand how to play it, have never attempted to use that particular set of skills before, or overall can not get the main idea of how to be good at it, this does not happen all the time. Similarly, a person does not need to be good at a sport before they are bad at it. In fact, it is quite hard to become bad at a sport after one is good at it because talent is not something that is generally lost over time. Being bad at something does not imply...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!