SMJ 2008 Corporate Diversification
Strategic Management Journal
Strat. Mgmt. J., 29: 115–132 (2008)
Published online 4 October 2007 in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/smj.653
Received 11 March 2005; Final revision received 21 August 2007
CORPORATE DIVERSIFICATION: THE IMPACT OF
FOREIGN COMPETITION, INDUSTRY
GLOBALIZATION, AND PRODUCT DIVERSIFICATION
MARGARETHE F. WIERSEMA1 * and HARRY P. BOWEN2
1
Paul Merage School of Business, University of California, Irvine, California, U.S.A.
McColl School of Business, Queens University of Charlotte, Charlotte, North
Carolina, U.S.A.
2
The globalization of markets and industries has fundamentally changed the competitive conditions facing firms. Yet, how globalization has influenced the international diversification strategies of firms is an issue largely overlooked in both the strategic management and international business literatures. This paper develops a theoretical framework to understand how industry globalization, foreign competition, and firm product diversification may influence a firm’s choice of its degree and scope of international diversification. Utilizing a panel dataset of U.S. manufacturing firms for the period 1987–99, we provide the first empirical evidence that industry globalization and foreign-based competition are statistically significant factors explaining the degree and scope of international diversification by U.S. firms. Copyright 2007 John Wiley
& Sons, Ltd.
INTRODUCTION
One of the most significant changes in the world economy over the past two decades has been a growing globalization of markets and industries. Numerous forces have contributed to rising globalization, including reductions in multilateral and regional trade barriers (Krueger, 1995), reduced costs of international transport and communications (Hummels, 1999), and reform and greater global integration of capital markets (Sachs and Warner, 1995). The ongoing consequences of globalization include widespread industry rationalization and
Strat. Mgmt. J., 29: 115–132 (2008)
Published online 4 October 2007 in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/smj.653
Received 11 March 2005; Final revision received 21 August 2007
CORPORATE DIVERSIFICATION: THE IMPACT OF
FOREIGN COMPETITION, INDUSTRY
GLOBALIZATION, AND PRODUCT DIVERSIFICATION
MARGARETHE F. WIERSEMA1 * and HARRY P. BOWEN2
1
Paul Merage School of Business, University of California, Irvine, California, U.S.A.
McColl School of Business, Queens University of Charlotte, Charlotte, North
Carolina, U.S.A.
2
The globalization of markets and industries has fundamentally changed the competitive conditions facing firms. Yet, how globalization has influenced the international diversification strategies of firms is an issue largely overlooked in both the strategic management and international business literatures. This paper develops a theoretical framework to understand how industry globalization, foreign competition, and firm product diversification may influence a firm’s choice of its degree and scope of international diversification. Utilizing a panel dataset of U.S. manufacturing firms for the period 1987–99, we provide the first empirical evidence that industry globalization and foreign-based competition are statistically significant factors explaining the degree and scope of international diversification by U.S. firms. Copyright 2007 John Wiley
& Sons, Ltd.
INTRODUCTION
One of the most significant changes in the world economy over the past two decades has been a growing globalization of markets and industries. Numerous forces have contributed to rising globalization, including reductions in multilateral and regional trade barriers (Krueger, 1995), reduced costs of international transport and communications (Hummels, 1999), and reform and greater global integration of capital markets (Sachs and Warner, 1995). The ongoing consequences of globalization include widespread industry rationalization and
References: Ai C, Norton E. 2003. Interaction terms in logit and probit models Baldwin RE. 1971. Determinants of the commodity structure of U.S Barney JB. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantages. Journal of Management 5: 3–10. Bartelsman R, Gray W. 1996. The National Bureau of Economic Research manufacturing productivity Bartlett CA, Ghosal S. 1989. Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution Bergh DD. 1995. Problems with repeated measures analysis: demonstration with a study of the Bergsten C, Horst T, Moran T. 1978. American Multinationals and American Interests. Brookings Institution: Washington, DC. Bernard A, Jensen J, Schott P. 2006. Survival of the best fit: low-wage competition and the (uneven) growth Strat. Mgmt. J., 29: 115–132 (2008) DOI: 10.1002/smj Bowen HP, Wiersema MF. 1999. Matching method to paradigm in strategy research: limitations of Bowen HP, Wiersema MF. 2004. Data analysis with discrete and censored dependent variables and Bowen HP, Wiersema MF. 2005. Foreign-based competition and corporate diversification strategy. Strategic Management Journal 26(12): 1153–1171. Buckley PJ, Casson M. 1976. The economic theory of foreign investment Buckley PJ, Ghauri PN. 2004. Globalization, economic geography and the strategy of multinational enterprises Buhner R. 1987. Assessing international diversification of West German corporations Capar N, Kotabe M. 2003. The relationship between international diversification and performance in Caves RE. 1971. International corporations: the industrial economics of foreign investment Caves RE. 1974. Multinational firms, competition, and productivity in host-country markets Caves RE. 1982. Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis (Cambridge Surveys of Economic Literature) Caves RE. 1996. Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis (Cambridge Surveys of Economic Literature) Chung W. 2001a. Identifying technology transfer in foreign direct investment: influence of industry Chung W. 2001b. Mode, size, and location of foreign direct investment and industry markups Coase RH. 1938. The nature of the firm. Economica 5: 386–405. Congressional Budget Office. 1987. The GATT Negotiations and U.S. Trade Policy. CBO: Washington, DC. Delios A, Beamish P. 1999. Geographic scope, product diversification, and the corporate performance of Denis DJ, Denis DK, Yost K. 2002. Global diversification, industrial diversification, and firm value. Journal of Finance 6: 1951–1979. Domowitz IR, Hubbard G, Petersen BC. 1986. Business cycles and the relationship between concentration and Doukas J, Lang L. 2003. Foreign direct investment, diversification and firm performance Driffield N, Munday M. 2000. Industrial performance, agglomeration, and foreign manufacturing investment Dunning JH. 1993. The Globalization of Business. Geringer JM, Beamish PW, da Costa RC. 1989. Diversification strategy and internationalization: implications for MNE performance