Slavery In Civil War
SLAVERY AND THE WAR
The institution of slavery was changed in two ways by the war. In the first place there was a degree of de facto emancipation in that wherever Federal armies held Southern ground, slaves would leave their masters. These "contrabands"—first named as such by Benjamin Butler—had a shadowy legal status and this was partly a function of political considerations, Lincoln not wishing to get too far out ahead of public opinion with respect to making the war unpopular by turning it into a war against slavery and not wishing to alienate the border states as well.
When General Fremont officially emancipated the slaves of Missouri, Lincoln made him rescind the order. However, it became a fact of life that many black people, having left their masters, were never forced to return and some army units disobeyed orders by not returning "contrabands" to their masters when told to do so (McPherson 354-7).
The Emancipation Proclamation spelled the doom of chattel slavery in the United States even though it did not apply to slaves in states loyal to the Union. It did, however, extend de jure free status to all those "contrabands" who had run away from masters in Confederate states. Of course it did nothing for those black people who were toiling on ground under the control of the Confederate government. It was a joke of the times that the Emancipation Proclamation freed the slaves in states Lincoln did not control and kept them slaves in the states he did control.
But the Emancipation Proclamation was as far as Lincoln could go. There was widespread resentment in the Federal army concerning it (Williams 240) and a more radical step might have resulted in a dangerous degree of disaffection. And, as mentioned above, Lincoln could not afford to lose the support of the slave holding states still in the Union.
Moreover, though not officially the end of slavery in the United States, the Emancipation Proclamation made it inevitable...
Please login to view the full essay...