OPPapers.com Essay Index >> Technology >> Security Versus Privacy: Does Terrorism Change The Debate?
We have many free term papers and essays on Security Versus Privacy: Does Terrorism Change The Debate?. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
Security Versus Privacy: Does Terrorism Change the Debate? The events of September 11th have dramatically affected the way that Americans view their right to "privacy",
and methods in use today. The past 40 years ushered in several laws designed to protect national security by redefining the concept of personal privacy. Governing
surveillance powers over American and reduces people's privacy. Section 802 gives the meaning to domestic terrorism and it is not specific so it has the potential
I may require, downloading them back to my stored value card (Wahlert 1996). F. Electronic Vandalism and Terrorism As never before, western industrial society is
of health care provided to all patients. The main barrier to this type of database is the security and privacy issues inherent in the Internet. The Internet has effectively
Submitted by kinkoexpress on March 21, 2006
Category: Technology
Words: 356 | Pages: 2
Views: 363
Popularity Rank: 34,469
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
The events of September 11th have dramatically affected the way that Americans view their right to "privacy", and the level of government access to private information needed to protect all citizens from future terrorist attacks. Though the right to "individual privacy" is not explicitly stated in the Constitution, it does specifically state the rights of the government (Browne, May 2003). There are two different thoughts on the issue and they are divided along the lines of those who want to live in a secure environment and those who want to live in a free environment. A happy medium can exist between the two factions; however, there will never be a secure society that grants all individual liberties. Terrorist attacks have promulgated several initiatives to improve the U.S. government's ability to identify and track the movements of potential criminals that live within its borders. The fear that Americans have that they may experience another atrocious act of cowardice has forced them to evaluate whether some of our rights to "privacy" hinder their ability to protect themselves. Therefore, many citizens are more willing to give up certain freedoms when "terrorism" becomes part of the debate. As a result, millions of dollars have been spent since 2001 to launch surveillance satellites, improve eavesdropping technology, and create massive databases that gather personal information and create records on citizens in hopes of locating criminals before they strike. There are individuals that feel tapping phone lines, sharing personal information, and monitoring citizens has infringed on our right to privacy without guarantees that crime and terrorism will be prevented. Databases such as Carnivore and MATRIX have billions of personal records, but, even with a 1% error rate, do not possess the capability to produce accurate leads on potential terrorists that live within the country, and the potential for several innocent citizens' rights to be violated exists. Are...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!