Preview

Rhetorical Technique Essay – a Change of Heart About Animals

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
811 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rhetorical Technique Essay – a Change of Heart About Animals
In the article, A Change of Heart about Animals, written by Jeremy Rifkin is about how animals are very similar to human beings. Some animals are capable of having emotions and the mental ability to complete tasks as humans can. Rifkin emphasizes how animals should have better treatment due to the lack of compassion and acknowledgment among animals. He uses distinctive types of rhetorical techniques to persuade his audience to agree and feel his pain for these creatures. For instance, Rifkin uses pathos in his writing to get emotional feedback from the reader; he makes the reader feel some sort of guilt or pity for the animals. He also uses examples that have a great deal of credibility; such as using animals that are almost as intelligent as humans and including studies from universities and educational references. Rifkin also makes sure to include companies that supports animal rights that one would never imagine supporting. Lastly, Rifkin uses another technique that would leave the reader questioning their own concerns relating to animal rights. Throughout the whole article Rifkin makes sure the audience will feel sympathetic towards these animals. One of the first things he stated was, “They feel pain, suffer, and experience stress, affection, excitement and even love” (2). Since these animals share the same emotions and anxiety as humans do, then the reader can relate on an expressive level with these animals. An actual example that Rifkin uses was how elephants will mourn over a death of their kin. An elephant will stand next to their dead kin for a few days and mourn over the death. This elephant will not only just stand there but would touch the dead kin and seem to be feeling lost without them. Rifkin uses this example because people tend to believe that animals don’t grieve or understand the sense of morality. Since it turns out that elephants do mourn over a dead kin, the reader can relate and have feel some sort of sympathy. Yet, the


Cited: Jeremy Rifkin. “A Change of Heart about Animals.” The Mirror Company: Los Angeles Times, Page 15.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Animals deserve rights because just like humans, they feel excruciating pain, suffer and have feelings. One would argue that animals don’t experience emotions? But the answer is of course they do. It is emotions that allow animals to display various behavior patterns. According to the theory of utilitarianism, all sentient beings should be given consideration in the society and this includes both animals and humans. Also, animals cannot speak for themselves and for this reason they should be treated equally, protected and given the same respect as human beings. Peter singer’s approach also supports the argument on equal consideration in that animals deserve the same respect as human beings but just in a different view. In today’s society humans exploit animals for milk, meat, fur, scientific experimentation etc. and animals are constantly injured or killed. Their pain and sufferings should be taken into consideration, as this unjust treatment is morally unacceptable. Similarly speciesism is an…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I am writing to you regarding Mr. Jeremy Rifkin’s article.”A Change Of Heart About Animals” I personally didnt agree with much of what Rifkin said.To me he is a man who just talks and doesnt really go in to depth or think what hes trying to say through.He reccomended we give pigs toys so that they would be more happier and less agressive.Mr. Bob Stevens on the other hand had an amazing argument to what Mr.Rifkin was saying it was outstanding.Rifkin makes an argument saying that we should be more sympathetic on how we treat our animals.Logically there is million of kids in the world who do not have toys but have familes and can not afford them.So there is a dirty pig who is destin for slaughter that is given the oppurtunity to have toys,they…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jeremy Rifkin, an American economist, writer and public speaker, is founder and president of the Foundation on Economic Trends (FOET). In his article, “A Change of Heart about Animals,” published in the Los Angeles Times (2003), suggests that animals are more like humans in the sense that they are capable of feeling emotions as well as comprehending concepts much like we’ve never expected. He supports his claim by providing a series of statistics, facts and rhetorical questions, all of which have a strong appeal directly to logos and indirectly to pathos.…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In discussion of inhumane treatment, a controversial issue is whether animals are entitled to their rights. While some argue that only humans have rights, others contend that animals should have the same privileges as humans. The author of “A Change of Heart about Animals,” Jeremy Rifkin, claims that animals should have better treatment. Rifkin rhetorically changes one’s view on this subject without the consent of the reader. Rifkin begins by showing the animals’ human qualities, then giving a counter statement to common objections, and finally ends it by utilizing negative language. Rifkin’s expressive strategy is to note the similarities between animals and humans. Rifkin mentions Koko, a 300-pound gorilla. Koko was able to learn sign language…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author gives several specific examples throughout the article of animal abuse which he then follows with the corresponding consequences of these actions and the lack of implementation by the USDA in these incidents. The author writes in this specific order to create an emotional response from the audience by first making the reader remorseful for the animals explaining how they were brutally treated. He then describes how there were no consequences for these actions which consequently causes the reader to feel outraged and more likely to side with…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After reading “A Change of Heart about Animals”, Jeremy Rifkins argues that animals should be treated in a more humane way. I agree with Rifkins argument because I have seen animals get abuse and it should not be like that. People may say that they do not feel anything but THEY DO! It’s similar to when a humane it getting abused. Many researchers are finding that the animals are similar to us in many ways: they feel pain, suffer, and experience stress, affection, excitement, and even love. Rifkins give scientific evidence to support his argument from credible source and make his stronger.…

    • 190 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In an article on September 1st of the Los Angeles Times, Jeremy Rifkin claims animals have the same understanding and concept of emotions we humans have, and that we should treat them as our equals. This idea of his is absurd, and if you really look at it you can see, he is just another animal rights activist trying to get his voice heard.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justin Le Ms. Jackson ERWC English 28 October 2014 Animal Bill of Rights Despite our genetic makeup and ability, each living organism still obtains the ability to partake in the vast contribution towards this world. We as humans should be proactive in our role of establishing and maintaining a fine balance of life. A prominent responsibility we possess is to regard all living beings as equals.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In “A Change of Heart about Animals”, Jeremy Rifkin says that animals are more like us than we imagined and that we should treat them the same way we treat humans. Although Rifkin’s background is impressive, and he is probably very knowledgeable about economic trends in Washington DC, there is little evidence provided that he has much expertise in the areas of animal emotions and their cognitive abilities.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Your newspaper published an editorial “A Change of Heart about Animals” September 1, 2003 by Jeremy Rifkin, author and president of the Foundation on Economic Trends, in which Rifkin suggests that the center of the human experience is about extending concern to wider and wider realms to the species we share the world with (34). He implies throughout the article that animals like us, feel pain, experience stress, affection, excitement, and even love (33) . He claims that animals should be treated better because they experience similar emotions we do. By focusing on the ideal of extending the amount of empathy we give to animals, Jeremy Rifkin overlooks the deeper issue of how these creatures of the world feel about us because he does not consider that like them, we…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jeremy Rifkin in the article “A Change of Heart About Animals” describes how the lives of animals are all for the benefit of the human race and how animals deserve more respect. Many concerned and caring people believe that animals should be treated with love and respect. The reality of this is that Rifkin seizes to comprehend that the life without using animals as a benefit is highly unlikely and would just further complicate the already complex world we live in today. To some point I can agree with Rifkin, but highly disagree with him when it comes to how animals are only used for benefiting humans.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the article “ A change of Heart about Animals” by Rifkin, he states “ They feel pain, suffer, and experiences stress, affection, excitement and even love--and these findings are changing how we view animals.” These characteristics are just like any human being they feel pain just as we feel pain, they suffer just like we do too therefore i agree that they should have the same rights as us humans. Although many other people might say they're just animals but they realize they are species just like us humans.…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Visualize having someone mistreat you because they don’t feel the pain they’re making you go through. As humans we are capable of letting others know when we are in pain and we are also capable of standing up for ourselves. Animals aren’t able to do that so they are treated unfairly, like if they didn’t feel any pain at all. Although many believe that animals shouldn’t be treated like humans, my goal is to convince my classmates that we should improve the way we treat animals.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people believe that animals have feelings and that they are able to feel what a human feels such love, suffering, stress even some people think that we share similar characteristics. in the article "A Change of Heart About Animals '' the author Jeremy Rifkin argument that animals are the same as human beings and that we should also treat them with love and respect. For some reasons, activists and some law schools believe in animals rights and they want to protect animals but if there were a bill of rights for animals some certain things would change for a reason some would not be benefit from this. Pass a bill of right it is not a good idea because it would change many things.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rights?

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    (Intro) Do you believe animals and humans are the same. “A Change of Heart About Animals” by Jeremy Rifkin, describes how the lives of animals are all for the benefit of the human race and how animals deserve more respect. Many concerned and caring people believe that animals should be treated with love and respect. The reality of this is that Rifkin doesn’t understand that life without using animals as a benefit is highly unlikely and would just complicate the already complex world we live in today. To some point I can agree with Rifkin, but highly disagree with him when it comes to how animals are only used for benefiting humans.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays