OPPapers.com Essay Index >> English >> Rhetorical Analysis Assignment: President’S Address To The Nation
We have many free term papers and essays on Rhetorical Analysis Assignment: President’S Address To The Nation. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
Submitted by 3024700 on May 3, 2008
Category: English
Words: 1656 | Pages: 7
Views: 183
Popularity Rank: 75,782
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
Rhetorical analysis assignment: President’s Address to the Nation
Since the 9/11 attacks, the Bush administration has been calling every citizens and every nations to support his Middle East policy. Nonetheless, the U.S. has been involved in the middle-east struggle for more than half of the century, wars were waged and citizens were killed. Yet, political struggles and ideological conflicts are now worse than they were under Clinton’s presidency. As “President’s Address to the Nation” is a speech asking everybody to support the troops to keep fighting in Iraq, I, as an audience, am not persuaded at all because of his illogical fallacy in the arguments. In this essay, I will analyze how and what are the illogical fallacies he uses in the speech.
The “President’s address to the Nation” is a claim of policy. President Bush is asking people to support his policy that “we” have to keep fighting the war “until either we or the extremists emerge victorious.” To hold up his claim of such a policy, he uses three supports during the speech.
The first support is that “if we do not defeat these enemies now, we will leave our children to face a Middle East overrun by terrorist states and radical dictators armed with nuclear weapons.” To back up such an idea, he uses two backings. The first backing is “if we pulled out… they (the terrorists) will not leave us alone. They will follow us… they
will gain a new safe haven; they will use Iraq’s resources to fuel their extremist movement” while the second backing is that the terrorists hate “us”. To come up with these backings, he assumes that terrorists will use nuclear weapons to attack us as soon as they can obtain nuclear weapons. The illogical fallacy of this assumption is cause and effect which happens when one event is based on the beliefs that one event will bring on another. There are more then twenty nations, including the U.S, process...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!