OPPapers.com Essay Index >> Religion >> On Religion: Speeches To Its Cultured Despisers
We have many free term papers and essays on On Religion: Speeches To Its Cultured Despisers. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
On Religion: Speeches to its Cultured Despisers On Religion: Speeches to its Cultured Despisers Friedrich Schleiermacher, a Protestant theologian, philosopher, and
Submitted by colbyg on July 22, 2006
Category: Religion
Words: 965 | Pages: 4
Views: 564
Popularity Rank: 19,374
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
On Religion: Speeches to its Cultured Despisers
Friedrich Schleiermacher, a Protestant theologian, philosopher, and educator, who wrote On Religion: Speeches to its Cultured Despisers (1799), ventured into Christian dogmatics in a non-conventional yet avant-garde manner. His new approach to critically analyzing religion signaled the beginning of the era of Protestant Liberal Theology whilst simultaneously placing his book among the "classic" substantive works that speaks to "religion and Christian faith" (Schleiermacher vii).
Schleiermacher, sometimes called the "father of modern theology," believes shreds of faith are present in knowing (doctrine) and doing (ethical action), but it is most fully encapsulated by a kind of "feeling" or intuition, the "feeling (consciousness) of absolute dependence."
Faith belongs to two levels: the foremost, which is the "immediate" self-consciousness and the second, which is the "sensible" self-consciousness (Schleiermacher 36). The latter refers to the self in relation to the world. The ‘world' consists of nature and society. Therefore, the two levels are inexorably linked.
He proposed to the "cultural despisers" of religion that when they rejected traditional dogmas, they were not in essence rejecting the faith upon which it was founded. They despise dogma and its application in the societal realm which parallels to one's distaste for the shell and not the peanut within; they are fixed upon its trappings. The same principle pertains to defenders of religion since they do not defend religion either; it is a mere buttress for morals and social institutions. To truly ascertain religion, one must close his/her eyes to false appearances and associations ingrained by history and society, and delve into the self-interior of one's pious soul.
Every human being is or has the potential to be to be a devout soul. The difficulty arises in the process of...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!