OPPapers.com Essay Index >> Philosophy >> A Reconciliation Of Self And State In Hobbes' Leviathan
We have many free term papers and essays on A Reconciliation Of Self And State In Hobbes' Leviathan. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
Submitted by rooster4242 on July 3, 2006
Category: Philosophy
Words: 1666 | Pages: 7
Views: 538
Popularity Rank: 14,869
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
Ross Strain
Kinlaw
A Reconciliation of Self and State in Hobbes’ Leviathan
In the Leviathan, Hobbes argues for a social contract that involves rule by a sovereign, or monarch, that is instituted by the people. During his discourse Hobbes makes the claim that people are naturally inclined to pursue self interest, while at the same time positing that these very people have a responsibility to the sovereign that rules them. The apparent problem is immediately perceived by the reader – in order to fulfill their responsibility to a sovereign, must they not deny the pursuit of self-interest and replace it with the pursuit of the sovereign’s interest? Surely Hobbes is not suggesting that man deny his true nature… is he? Upon further examination of the text the reader discovers that indeed Hobbes does allow for a people to fulfill the interests of the sovereign without denying what he has professed to be human nature. However, we jump too far ahead, in order to understand the compatibility of these two seemingly irreconcilable sentiments one must start from the very beginning of the text.
Hobbes opens in an attempt to analyze society with a series of definitions, beginning with Man and the Senses. He speaks of man’s perception in a series of events that leads to his definition of imagination as being “nothing but decaying sense,” and is the same as memory. He treats dreams and speech in much the same way in order to support his claim about the necessity of definitions to reach an understanding. This is the first point in Leviathan that the reader is explicitly shown by the author that he is attempting to reduce “human nature” into a series of undeniable truths. Hobbes is apparently working with the theory that if one can define humanity in terms that nobody can dispute, then surely one can do the same with a social contract. Even Hobbes’ definitions of the Passions are very unemotional, cut and dry...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!