OPPapers.com Essay Index >> Business >> The Ready-To-Eat Breakfast Cereal Industry In 1994
We have many free term papers and essays on The Ready-To-Eat Breakfast Cereal Industry In 1994. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
The Ready-to-Eat Breakfast Cereal Industry in 1994 The Ready-to-Eat Breakfast Cereal Industry in 1994 Why have private labels been able to enter this industry successfully?
N Cereal Bars Breakfast/Cereal/Snack Bars MPNSC Masterfoods USA Kudos Granola Bars MNSYC Atkins Nutritional Atkins Advantage Nutritional/Intrinsic Health Value Bars
Submitted by best14buy on April 15, 2007
Category: Business
Words: 428 | Pages: 2
Views: 431
Popularity Rank: 28,095
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
The Ready-to-Eat Breakfast Cereal Industry in 1994
Why have private labels been able to enter this industry successfully? How do the cost structures of private label and branded cereal manufacturers differ?
The private labels have been able to enter the ready-to-eat cereal industry successfully for the following reasons:
High prices set by major manufacturers (incumbents)
Retailers' willingness to promote better because of better margins
Coupon promotions by major manufacturers eroding brand loyalty
Failed brand extensions by major manufacturers
Increased technological competence raising product quality
Proliferation of mass merchandisers that did not need slotting fees
High prices set by branded cereal manufacturers (incumbents)
The incumbents engaged in increasing the prices and then spending more on advertisements and promotions to steal consumers from their competitors, eventually leading to a zero-sum game. The consumers resented the tactics of the firms to charge high price for such a basic food item and started looking for alternatives. Private labels positioned themselves as alternative to expensive cereals.
Retailers' willingness to promote better because of better margins
Because of their low-cost structure, private labels could afford to give 3% margin more than branded cereals to retailers. Higher margins led to heavy promotions of private labels by retailer.
Coupon promotions by major manufacturers eroding brand loyalty
Branded manufacturers heavily promoted their products through frequent sale promotions and coupons, conditioning the consumers to pay less. Such tactics eroded brand loyalty as consumers were given incentives to switch brands eroding brand loyalty. When there were no coupons, consumers looked for cheaper alternatives, which...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!