OPPapers.com Essay Index >> Science >> Re-Licensing Of Nuclear Facilities In Canada:
We have many free term papers and essays on Re-Licensing Of Nuclear Facilities In Canada:. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
Re-Licensing of Nuclear Facilities in Canada: Abstract Relatively few social
scientists have studied citizen protest groups concerned ...
... Distribution Network · Government Body/Agency Licensing allows a ... their time and services
but through re-imbursement for ... uranium for it’s nuclear power plants ...
... who has the potential risk of nuclear war ... though new product development or product
re-design can ... problems with cost in technology, real estate, and licensing. ...
... the delays associated with the US licensing process. ... world, enraged at the emergency
re-supply effort ... Foreign Trade and Prohibition of Nuclear, Biological, and ...
... built with the goal of withstanding a nuclear attack ... On the Internet, nobody knows
you're a dog ... Communicator client software available for free licensing on the ...
Submitted by acsel04 on December 10, 2006
Category: Science
Words: 9974 | Pages: 40
Views: 282
Popularity Rank: 34,548
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
Abstract
Relatively few social scientists have studied citizen protest groups concerned with civilian nuclear power, and the relationship between political conflict over risk and regulation of the nuclear industry. Drawing from social movement research, the paper argues that anti-nuclear protests can be viewed as collective risk movements which reject conventional forms of political decision-making in favour of more proactive forms that expand civil rights and the resources of the public. Examples from the Canadian anti-nuclear context are explored.
Introduction
For years the advantages of living in industrial society appeared to eclipse the dangers created by unsafe industrial practices. This attitude steadily changed since the early 1970s with environmentalism. For example, nuclear energy has become both a symbol of industrial progress and energy self-sufficiency, and perceived as a threat to human health and the ecosystem. The risks associated with nuclear energy have galvanized individuals into two distinct camps: those who support it and those who oppose this energy source and prefer what has been called "sustainable" or "appropriate" technology (Mehta, 1995a). In seeking to overcome pervasive risks to human health and environment, democratic societies typically provide citizens the right to comprehend or review and take part in governmental decision-making. However, creating participatory mechanisms for the public to assess and debate nuclear energy policy or a nuclear plant license is difficult when decision-making is dominated by technical expertise (Jasanoff, 1986). Even the language of political debate about nuclear power is highly technical and requires, many argue, specialized knowledge in the assessment and management of technologically-generated risks. Such specialization raises concern that public decision-making will shift from politically responsible authorities to those who best understand the technical...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!