Political Turncoatism
Introduction To be a party to an organization is to be identified to that organization and renunciation of the other party. However, in the Philippine case politicians freely and gracefully shift from one party to another, the other changed his mind and do the same. Party- switching had been a common scenario in the Philippine politics. Its occurrence is usually at election times or at times when there is a need to resolve a certain conflict involving a political issue or question and during times of revolutions and People Power. True enough the party system of the country seems to resemble chameleons of politicians going from one party to another.
On several occasions when there is a need of choosing a stand, no contemporary party in the country had solidly put a stance. Member politicians usually pursue what they had in mind and in compromising with the other members of his own party and with that party unwilling to take his side, he resorts to switching parties.
There will always be a surprise during times of People Power where a number of personalities from the other party join the other for their support of their grievances and stance.
The recent division of the lower house regarding whether to impeach or not to impeach Gloria Macapagal Arroyo easily shows the different flaws in the Philippine Party System. Each party did not vote as a party but individually.
In times of elections, one party will attack the other by attacking the personality of a member of the opponents and not that of the programs or criticism of the platforms set forth. During these times, propaganda against a politician is always a common scenario. The Philippine Political system seems to be a game of personalities.
What does this mirror in the political and socio-cultural facet of the country? Could these liabilities be solved? What are the roots of this personal politics, weak party-system and turncoatism? These and other related subjects will be the focus of the study. We will try
On several occasions when there is a need of choosing a stand, no contemporary party in the country had solidly put a stance. Member politicians usually pursue what they had in mind and in compromising with the other members of his own party and with that party unwilling to take his side, he resorts to switching parties.
There will always be a surprise during times of People Power where a number of personalities from the other party join the other for their support of their grievances and stance.
The recent division of the lower house regarding whether to impeach or not to impeach Gloria Macapagal Arroyo easily shows the different flaws in the Philippine Party System. Each party did not vote as a party but individually.
In times of elections, one party will attack the other by attacking the personality of a member of the opponents and not that of the programs or criticism of the platforms set forth. During these times, propaganda against a politician is always a common scenario. The Philippine Political system seems to be a game of personalities.
What does this mirror in the political and socio-cultural facet of the country? Could these liabilities be solved? What are the roots of this personal politics, weak party-system and turncoatism? These and other related subjects will be the focus of the study. We will try
References: Abueva, Jose. (1997). Democracy: Philippine Perspective in Philippine Democratization and the Consolidation of Democracy since the 1986 Revolution: An Overview of the Main Issues, Trends and Prospects. Quezon City: UP Press. pp. 26-28. Acosta, Nereus. (2000). Alternative Pinoy Politics: Sketching Roadmaps in Philippine Political Culture: Views from Inside the Halls of Power. Chapter 1. Quezon City: Kayumanggi Press. pp. 69-93 Adriano, Fermin, Ph.D Bionat, Marvin. (1998). How to Win or Lose in Philippine Elections. QC: Oregon International Publishing Co. pp. 72-73. Coronel, Shiela, et.al. (1999). The Rulemakers: How the Wealthy and Well-Born Dominate the Congress. Quezon City: Philippine Institute for Investigative Journalism, 2002. pp. 59-69. Dapen, Liang. (1976). Philippine Parties and Politics. USA Edward Brother Incorporated. David, Paul. (1968). The Changing Political Parties in Parties and the Governmental System: A Book of Readings. ed.by. Garold Thumm and Edward Janosik. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Incorporate, Englewoods Cliff. pp.18-24. De Quiros, Conrado. (1992). Guns, Goons and Government in In 1992 and Beyond: Forces and Issues in Philippine Elections. ed. by. Lorna Kalaw-Tirol and Sheila Coronel Quezon City: Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism. pp. 7-33. Doronila, Armando Duverger, Maurice. (1955). Political Parties. translated by Barbara and Robert North. United Kingdom: London Methuen & Co. LTD. Eldersverd, Samuel Funderburk, Charles and Thobaben Robert. (1989) Political Ideologies: Left, Center and Right. USA: Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. pp. 1-13. Garrido, Marco. The mad, mad world of Philippine politics. Asia Times. content@asiatimes.com. January 22, 2005. Gutierrez, Eric, et.al. (1992). All in the Family: A Study of Elites and Power Relations in the Philippines. Ed. by. Noel Pangilinan. Diliman, Quezon City: Institute for Popular Democracy. pp. 165-166. Holmes Ronald. (1995). Philippine Political Spectrum in Philippine Government. ed. by. Ronald Holmes. Manila: De La Salle University Press. pp. 113-120. Inkles, Alex. (1991). Transitions to Democracy. Society. May-June 1991 iissue. Magno, Francisco. (1995). Concepts in Philippine Government in Philippine Government. ed. by. Ronald Holmes. Manila: De La Salle University Press. pp. 3-16 Magno, Francisco Meinarudus, Ronald. Resident Representative of the Friedrich-Naumann-Foundation in the Philippines and a commentator on Asian affairs. (08-14-2003) [Liberal Times] Political Parties and Ideological Mainstreams. Korea times. July 23, 2005 Mendoza, Diana J Neumann, Sigmund. (1968). Toward a Comparative Study of Political Parties in Parties and the Governmental System: A Book of Readings. ed.by. Garold Thumm and Edward Janosik. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Incorporate, Englewoods Cliff. pp.7-18 Petierra, Raul Riedinger, Jeffrey. (2001). Caciques and Coups: The Challenge of Democratic Consolidation in the Philippines in the Philippines in Dynamics of Philippine Politics: A Canon of Readings, Mimeographed. UST: Faculty of Arts and Letters, p. 32-52. Sabangan, Annie Ruth C. (2004). Turncoatism breeds chameleons. Manila Times. www. manilatimes . com. July 22, 2005 Salonga, Jovito R Sidel, John. (1998) Take the Money and Run? Personality Politics in Post Marcos Era. Public Policy. July-September issue. pp.2-9. Thompson, Mark R. (1996). Off the Endangered List: Philippine Democratization in Comparative Politics, Vol. 28, Issue No. 2. pp. 179-205 Timberman, David Varela, Amelia P. (1994). Administrative Culture and Political Change. 1st ed. Diliman, Quezon City: College of Public Administration, University of the Philippines Press, p. 1-21, 88-99, 195-313 Velasco, Djorina American Parties in Comparative Perspective. internet. Data. July 22, 2005. http;/wps.ablongman.com/long_Edwards_gab7/0,8044,879421-,00.html. Sa pagkakataon na mayroon kayong komento, tanong o reaksyon maaari po kayong makipag-ugnayan sa akin,. Maari nyo po akong makausap sa numerong ito, 09209275703.