OPPapers.com Essay Index >> Science >> Pluto: A Planet?
We have many free term papers and essays on Pluto: A Planet?. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
Pluto: A Planet? Pluto: A Planet? Many issues have arisen from the debate whether or not Pluto is a planet. Some astronomers say that Pluto should be classified
Pluto: No Longer a planet Once known as the ninth planet of the solar system, Pluto is now the second-largest dwarf planet. Composed primarily of ice and rock, Pluto
Pluto In the outer limits of our solar system there is a planet unlike any other, Pluto. Pluto was discovered in February of 1930 by an American astronomer, Clyde
on the distant planet delayed a realistic understanding of its characteristics. Today Pluto remains the only planet that has not been visited by a spacecraft, yet
Pluto Introduction My project is about Pluto. It is the ninth planet from the sun and the smallest. Pluto is also the planet least known about, so in the following
Submitted by lordan3 on April 11, 2005
Category: Science
Words: 1641 | Pages: 7
Views: 377
Popularity Rank: 34,536
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
Pluto: A Planet?
Many issues have arisen from the debate whether or not Pluto is a planet. Some astronomers say that Pluto should be classified as a "minor planet" due to its size, physical characteristics, and other factors. On the other hand, some astronomers defend Pluto's planet status, citing several key features.
Indeed, most of the problem is that there is no formal definition of a planet. Furthermore, it is very difficult to invent one that would allow the solar system to contain all nine planets. I suggest that for an object to be classified as a planet, it must embody three characteristics. It must be in orbit around a star (thus removing the larger satellites from contention), it must be too small to generate heat by nuclear fusion (so dwarf stars are excluded) and it must be massive enough to have collapsed to a more or less spherical shape (which excludes comets, and most of the asteroids). These criteria would admit a few of the larger asteroids and probably some of the Kuiper belt objects as well, but adding a requirement for a planet to have a minimum diameter of 1,000 km would remove the larger asteroids from contention while retaining Pluto.
Below are some brief reasons as to why Pluto may not be considered a planet with my rebuttal.
Pluto is small compared to the other planets.
Pluto is about half the size of the next smallest planet, Mercury. However, there is no scientific reason whatsoever to pick the size of Mercury as being the size of the smallest object to be called a planet. Mercury itself is less than half the size of Mars, and Mars is only about half the size of Earth or Venus. Earth and Venus are only about one-seventh the size of Jupiter. Why not pick one-tenth the size of Jupiter as the size of the smallest planet, if the cutoff is going to be chosen arbitrarily? In that case, Mars, Mercury and Pluto would all have to be classified as asteroids. If the size-cutoff between asteroids and...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!