OPPapers.com

Peter's Chocolates

Peter’s Chocolate Company


To: General Manager
From:
Date:
Topic: Competitor Analysis Report
________________________________________

Analytical Comparison of Competitors

Callebaut

Although under performing Peter’s in blind taste tests, Callebaut is recognized as a leading product. Like Peter’s, Callebaut is a premium priced and high quality. Callebaut has employed a higher profile marketing strategy, and stronger promotion strategy than Peter’s. Callebaut benefits from a European “myth” in which it is thought that European chocolate is superior. Callebaut has a strong manufacturing plan in place in which it will produce chocolate in the US, thereby lowering it’s production costs and retailing lower than Peter’s. Callebaut’s strengths are in its name, quality, and origin of product. Callebaut’s main weakness is that it under performs Peter’s in blind taste tests. If Peter’s can exploit this, it may prove to be a significant weakness for Callebaut.

Merckens

Similar to Peter’s, Merckens is a North American produced chocolate. Merckens product is above average quality and price. Merckens has a successful distribution network of sales representatives who annually make personal contact with their customers. This is far more extensive than the limited sales network utilized by Peter’s. Merckens competitive advantage is its loyalty of Canadian confectioners and for the time being, its sales staff. Merckens is faced with weaknesses of not producing constructive criticism to customers, and not being well versed in confectionery formulation.

Neilson

Like Peter’s parent company Nestle, Neilson is a large company with large resources. But unlike Nestle, Neilson chooses to sell under its major name and benefits from name recognition. Neilson’s product is not as high quality as Peter’s and sells at a lower price point. Neilson dominates in sales, as it does things on a large scale. They sell to many large distributors, which...