Preview

Paulo Freire, a Christian-Marxist

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
936 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Paulo Freire, a Christian-Marxist
ENG 121
Instructor: Martin Ley
Formal Paper #4
By: Valerie A Perron
Date: 10-25-10

Paulo Freire, a Christian-Marxist

In this paper, I will be addressing the topic of how Christianity and Marxism cannot be yoked together. Let me first state that the kind of Christianity Paulo Freire says he believes in, is Catholicism. The Catholic Church tends to have beliefs that are not completely true to the Word of God because they take some scripture out of context. I do not claim to be of any certain doctrine of Christianity; however, I do claim that I am a Bible believing Christian. Everything I believe comes directly from the Bible and without distorting its words; I believe exactly what it says. For this reason, I have a problem with Freire’s belief system.
I believe Freire must pick either Christianity or Marxism. I think he is “riding the fence” on his choice of beliefs. If he continues to say he practices both, then he will always be questioning himself in more areas than one. When someone hears the combination of a Christian-Marxist, their first reaction will usually be “that’s an oxymoron,” or “that’s impossible.” How can they actually say they are Christian-Marxists, knowing that all they believe in is constantly contradicting itself? Freire will always, in my opinion, be questioning himself if, unless he looks into either one of the beliefs. Perhaps he will change his mind completely.
After doing some research on Marxism, I do not believe Freire understands the full extent of it, which is why he believes himself to be Christian as well. In the article The “Banking” Concept of Education, Freire believes in the individual fighting against being robotic, but Marxism (like communism) has the belief of controlling the free choices of the people’s individualism. In other words he believes that the students can be individuals, which contradicts his Marxism beliefs, which is a “group effort.” So how can he call himself a Marxist if he doesn’t fully agree

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Gke Task 4

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Steven (2009, December 14). Capitalism and communism - Gilles Dauv | libcom.org. libcom.org. Retrieved January 5, 2013, from http://libcom.org/library/capitalism-communism-gilles-dauve…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On page 18, chapter one the author states that she herself received teachings from Freire. She stated that she was “deeply moved by his presence, by the way in which his manner of teaching exemplified his pedagogical theory” (Hooks 18). This is not surprising due to the admiration the author had towards this man before she even met him. She went on to say that not everyone with teachings from Freire had a kindred positive experience. I thought this statement took away some of the power she had placed on the man. It made him seem more human, prone to mistakes, and probable to teach poorly if his pedagogical theories do not work. This devalues the ideology that the author has in her chapter based on his…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From a Christian perspective, Marxist communism failed because of the atheistic qualities. Marxist communism didn’t allow people to practice their religious beliefs. Marx’s social system also wouldn’t allow people to take home their own earnings, making everyone have the same earnings, wiping out inequality (Stapleford, 2009, p. 62). “The weakening of property rights for the rich or the talented also endangers the property right of the remainder of society and undermines economic growth” (Stapleford, 2009, p. 62). The lack of economic growth is ultimately what led to Marxist communism failing.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From a Christian perspective Marxist communism failed because it denied anything and everything about God or there even being any type of god. There was a real sense of atheistic aspects with in Marxist communism. As a Christian we know that anything without God means nothing at all and will end up failing miserably. Marxism was very controlling when it came to religious beliefs of any type. They closely monitored and control anything religious which didn’t sit well with the people and pushed people to resist the rules. According to Stapleford, “Certainly communism, except in recalcitrant Cuba and North Korea, is dead” (2009, page…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Example of Db Post

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. From a Christian perspective, why did Marxist communism fail? From a Christian point of view, Marxist communism failed due to people not being offered a choice of whether or not to distribute riches to everyone. The author states: “Beginning in the Garden, God gave men and women the freedom to choose to do what is right. This is the heart of democracy” (Stapleford, 2009, p.98). Clearly, it is Godly for people to have freedom of choice; communism was not Godly and therefore, failed.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Karl Marx: Of course god was in your side in this bourgeoisie game!! The audacity of smug capitalist elitists to create this game, where…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cornel West Bio

    • 2995 Words
    • 12 Pages

    [ 2 ]. Cornel West, The Cornel West Reader (New York, NY.: Basic Civitas Books, 1999), page 2…

    • 2995 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his 2013 apostolic exhortation, Evangelii guadium (“The Joy of the Gospel”), Pope Francis contentiously lamented, “Today everything comes under the laws of competition and the survival of the fittest, where the powerful feed upon the powerless. As a consequence, masses of people find themselves excluded and marginalized: without work, without possibilities, without any means of escape.” Although the pope’s remarks were widely seen as an attack on capitalism and received a great deal of media attention, his criticism was by no means unique or radical (Scheer; Woodhill). Indeed, some of the most notable thinkers of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries fervently denounced capitalism’s inherent inequality, from Karl Marx, whose Manifesto fueled…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were many great educators in the twentieth century who laid the foundation for the field of education in the twenty first century. Two such educators were Paulo Freire and William Brickman. These great educators sought to research and adhere to such theories that has allowed the world to envision education differently through their dreams and theories.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Age of Ideologies is a big part of the church history spanning from the year 1914-1989. Some of the most common ideologies that were viewed during this time were Nazism, Marxism, and Capitalism. In this essay one should be able to see how these ideologies effected the evangelical and ecumenical movements.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx’s philosophy has been the subject of so much judgement and Scrutiny on if his beliefs will truly save the working man. The bourgeois interlocutor believe Marx’s belief would be more detrimental to the people as a whole. They believe that by wishing to abolish private property, communism will become a danger to freedom and eventual end up destroying the very base of all personal freedom, activity, and independence. Marx responds to these comments by stating that wage labor does not create any property when considering the laborers affairs. It only creates capital, a property which works only to increase the social injustice of the worker. This property called capital, is based on class antagonism. Having linked private property…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As became painfully evident to the people of Nicaragua, Pope John Paul II was not about to provide any encouragement for their revolutionary cause. During his visit to the country, his vehement opposition to liberation Theology was expressed as he told the people you must abandon your “unacceptable ideological commitments” (Hoyt, 1996). The pope was, of course, referring to what he considered the unholy wedding of Marxist principles with Christianity. And as far as the pope was concerned, there was no ground for compromise on the subject. Marxism in the mind of Pope John Paul II was an ungodly doctrine that placed human solutions, not God, at the center of all things.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1999, the BBC conducted a series of polls, asking people to vote on the greatest men and women of the millennium. Names like Albert Einstein, creator of the theory of relativity, Isaac Newton, initial theorist behind natural law, and Marie Curie, physicist and first woman recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize, were listed, however Karl Marx was voted the greatest man of the millennium. Marx’s accomplishment was creating the idea of Marxism, which has unarguably shaped many governments and created immense criticism of capitalism and democracy. One difference between Marx and the pioneers listed above, rests upon the idea of modern relevance. It…

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Functionalists and Marxists are the theorists who claim that religion is a conservative force, functionalists believe that religion promotes a stable society with no disruptions. Marxists on the other hand believe that the Bourgeoisie use religion to maintain their position of power in society, therefore keeping things as they are. Marx claimed that religion was an effective aget of social control, referring to religion as the ‘Opium of the masses’, pumping perception-distorting drugs into the proletariat like a hypodermic needle. For him it was a mechanism of social control, regulating the behaviour of the working class and preventing them from seeing their true situation in society.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays