OPPapers.com Essay Index >> Business >> Oticon Case Study
We have many free term papers and essays on Oticon Case Study. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
Oticon Case Study Case Study OTICON Today's knowledge special: spaghetti Knowledge has been recognized as a valuable resource necessary for organizational growth
Submitted by daneszac on May 26, 2007
Category: Business
Words: 1542 | Pages: 7
Views: 411
Popularity Rank: 29,926
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
Case Study
OTICON
Today's knowledge special: spaghetti
Knowledge has been recognized as a valuable resource necessary for organizational growth and sustained competitive advantage, especially for organizations competing in uncertain environment. Grant (1996) and Liebeskind (1996) argued that knowledge is an organization's most valuable resource because it represents intangible assets, operational routines and creative processes that are hard to imitate. This is probably why Oticon focuses so much on knowledge assets and the management. Because it is an innovation based industry whereby a single ingenious innovation can truly gain it an upper hand in the market it operates in. Most organizations do not possess all the required knowledge that needed within their formal boundaries and must rely on linkages to outside organizations and individuals to acquire knowledge.
In Oticon, they do so free from hierarchy and local rules. Though it has many different teams working on different projects, informal and reciprocal knowledge sharing between individuals are sustained through team mixing and no set team structure.
Traditional organisational structures are less conducive to information sharing; Oticon's approach resembling a plate of spaghetti' enables barriers that may exist under the traditional approach to be eliminated and the transfer of knowledge seems to flow easily between business units. Oticon encourages the sharing of information, via cross-functional and cross-hierarchical. Team members work in open areas and are not confined with whom they may relate, as is the case within a traditional organisational structure.
On the other hand, there are of course risks prevalent in Oticon, which is such a free form structure may not allow for dynamism or a strong figure to emerge to lead individual teams to breakthrough success as there is no status, or roles to be played by anyone. It seems...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!