Preview

Net Neutrality In Internet Research

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
932 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Net Neutrality In Internet Research
Thor Benson, an author and journalist, once said while talking about net-neutrality that there is no free expression when people have to pay to stand on the soapbox. For years, the internet has been an international gathering place where people with controversial ideas are free to speak their minds, and communities have been created around every topic. The average user is able to use their available bandwidth to do what they like, be it using Facebook, or watching videos on YouTube. Recently, however, internet service providers have been looking to gain money and power by limiting access to the internet, allowing instead for companies to pay for an elevated amount of connectivity. The result of this is the idea of net-neutrality, or an equality …show more content…
Whenever any major events happen, the first way many people of the younger generations find out is through a link or post on a website. When service providers can limit traffic and content, however, this interconnectivity of nations will be broken. According to Emma Cano in “Saving the Internet: Why Regulating Broadband Providers Can Keep the Internet Open,” published in the Brigham Young University Law Review, when ISPs are allowed to place their own restrictions on content and applications, it will break down the aspects of the Internet that help encourage this interconnectivity and sharing of information (723). Recently, it has been found that ISPs are using JavaScript, a tool that is commonly used for video displays, to inject code directly onto the user’s computer and display ads. Combining this with the monitoring of user’s browsing, this could create a way for ISPs to decide what content the user sees. Instead of important news stories or other useful content, ISPs could instead choose to show advertisements or to not even allow the content to be viewed at all. The lack of regulation would allow for these circumstances to occur, and if they were to entire nations could potentially be cut off from the rest of the world in terms of relevancy of …show more content…
When this network is at risk of being controlled by ISPs instead of being able to develop on its own, the usefulness of the service declines greatly. Without regulation, many of the technologies and ideas that could be developed off of the internet might never be made. The world would lose a way for communities to be connected, the ability to share news and information immediately, and the people who pay for this service would have to make a compromise in their budgets due to raised

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    People can certainly disagree with what I’ve just said. I have defended those views, which are the central core of the libertarian conception of justice, elsewhere. But if you accept what I said in the last paragraph, then net neutrality regulation is unjust. Why? Well, the ISPs own their pipes (or own the rights to use pipes in the way they’re using them). They can do whatever they want with them. They could just use their wires for their own purposes, e.g. hanging Christmas decorations or sending communications between their employees like an internal telephone system, or leave them unused. Instead, they reach mutually-consensual agreements with others (“customers”) whereby…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jrlc Chapter 2 Pt. 1

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages

    I believe that eventually some form of net neutrality will have to be put in place to prevent censorship or any restrictions of content based on person-to-person or amount of money being paid for service.…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The largest of these ways is its penetration into everyday life for nearly everyone. When the Internet was only for the exchange of ideas, hiccups, outages, and unreliably had little impact on society as a whole. The Internet now is a requirement for the world to function. The FCC's job now is to make sure that the ISP's have tools to maintain an infrastructure that provides services such as banking, governmental communication, monitoring other critical pieces of infrastructure such as the power grid.…

    • 1904 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to Lin Ray, net neutrality means no bit of information should be prioritized over another (“VCU Blog”, 2014). The origin of information doesn’t matter. Due to net neutrality, there are no restrictions on the internet currently. In other words, we can have free communication. The entire source of the internet is freely available for normal web users. Losing the freedom of internet access could result in restricted access to websites; fewer download rights and so on. The topic of net neutrality has become controversial because several companies are trying to take away the freedom of internet access.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Net Neutrality Rules

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages

    For this situation, the Internet Service Providers have demonstrated that the business sector will just hurt consumers if there is no administration intercession. By permitting any Internet Service Provider to level the web, consumers will be compelled to pay numerous times for the same services and access it has had since the beginning of the World Wide Web. On top of that, tiering could bring about the Internet Service Provider turning into a gate keeper of the Internet. This could have extreme influence what stays and goes on the web. Enforcing data caps and throttling data speeds can make the most popular services and websites slow to deliver content or just be unusable to begin with. It also will limit the usage and the time spend on the…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why Abolishing Net Neutrality Was a Bad Idea With the recent abolishment of net neutrality, an enormous discourse has risen about the legality and ethics of the abolishment of the Obama-era law. Although many argue that net neutrality is not useful for the United States, I think that net neutrality is needed in the interest of citizens. It preserves the internet as a public good and brings important economic benefits. While the opponents of net neutrality argue that the abolishing it will help the economy by reducing investment, I contend that preserving net neutrality allows the internet to be useful to more people and reduces the government’s over-controlling grip over us.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The question of rolling back net neutrality is morally problematic. In this paper, I will demonstrate that utilitarianism can be used to show that repealing net neutrality is morally impermissible. In section one of this paper, I will provide an overview of net neutrality and show both sides of the argument. In section two, I will provide a brief and concise overview of Utilitarianism. In section three, I will demonstrate that utilitarianism can defend net neutrality.…

    • 1730 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In recent years, there have been concerns about whether net neutrality will continue to be upheld by ISP’s (Schewick, 2009). This…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Whether we accomplish this by turning ISPs into common carriers or by enforcing a standard non-discrimination rule with the internet, there has to be a zero tolerance for throttling of websites based off of extra fees charged by the customer-side internet provider. No matter what they may try to claim, the main reason the corporations that own our nation’s ISPs are fighting against net neutrality is because they want to make more money. If America backs down on this issue, the internet as we know it will be lost. As Nilay Patel said, “What happens now is entirely dependent on whether the FCC’s new chairman, Tom Wheeler, has the courage to stand up and finally say the right words — that broadband access is a telecommunications service that should be regulated just like landline phones.”Works…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Kriens, S. (2006, November 29). Net Neutrality. Speech presented at Stanford Technology Venture Program, Stanford. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from http://ecorner.stanford.edu/authorMaterialInfo.html?mid=1638…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Killswitch Documentary

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Internet has become a popular source of mainstream media. A battle is raging over the control of the Internet, and the rights of the American people are at stake. The documentary Killswitch, exposes the true power of the Internet and how the government is controlling that power; violating freedom of speech and the right to privacy. The documentary takes a stand in favor of Net Neutrality, which is the principle that the Internet enables access to all-content without choosing or blocking certain websites. The efforts of Aaron Swartz and Edward Snowden to win back Internet freedom are highlighted in this documentary in order to appeal to American citizens to take action in favor of Net Neutrality. “Freedom is embedded in technology and we have to protect technology if we want to protect our freedom” (Killswitch). Internet regulation grants power to the Government and violates constitutional rights of Americans hindering the Nation’s founding principle of democracy.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Health

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is for you to:1. become familiar with Net Neutrality.2. identify the impact of Net Neutrality on your daily life and use of the Internet.3. identify why people are for it and others oppose it.4. formulate your own opinion about Net Neutrality.Directions: Follow the step-by-step instructions and use Microsoft Word to respond to the questions below. Your response to questions one, two, and three should collectively be no less than 200 words (The word count excludes the text for the questions). All answers must be original – NO copy and pasting from websites! Also, you must also include in-text citations and cite any sources on a reference page using proper MLA or APA format.Complete a word count and post it on the bottom of the document. Be sure to indicate your name and date at the top of the document.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    On certain sites, there could be options to pay extra for a _ÑÒfast lane,_Ñù a faster internet for extra payment. Without the current regulations, ISPs could manipulate us online. They could control what we can and can_Ñét see, and they could manipulate…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Net Neutrality

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Net neutrality has become threatened as in April 2010 the U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that the Federal Communications Commission, or FCC, could not force ISPs to give equal treatment to all internet traffic passing over their networks. In December 2010, the FCC came up with a solution that ISPs can regulate usage based on whether the internet service provided was wired or wireless. For fixed broadband networks, ISPs cannot block any lawful content, services, or applications. Wireless providers, may not block any web sites, however they are allowed to block applications and services. Considering these new guidelines the author suggested that net neutrality was now net semi-neutrality.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “In 2001, the International Telecommunication Union calculated that, approximately 2.3 billion people had internet access at the end of that year. Since then, the percentage of people using the internet around the world has continued to grow” (Li 2). Censoring the internet has been a hot topic for quite a while now. Many people believe that censoring the web isn’t a good thing because of certain laws and rights we have as citizens. The internet has some cons but it also has many pros. The downside of the censorship is that the truth is blocked out and it violates our freedom of speech. On the other hand, censorship of the internet can reduce the numbers or even stop human trafficking, prevent identity theft, stop cyber bullying and so much…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays