OPPapers.com Essay Index >> English >> Negligence - Duty Of Care
We have many free term papers and essays on Negligence - Duty Of Care. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
Negligence - Duty Of Care. EXISTENCE OF A DUTY Before 1932 there was no
generalised duty of care in negligence. The tort did exist ...
... According to Professional Negligence, Steven who services Angelina ¯s car owes
a duty of care to carry out the work safely not only to Angelina, but also to ...
... I am particularly concerned that Free Running Australia breached their duty of care. ...
no official safety rescuers onsite is evidence of negligence on behalf ...
... However, there was no generalised duty of care in negligence before a
case called Donoghue v Stevenson [1932]. In this case, it ...
... Duty of Care is also ... And although directors are not generally liable for negligence,
Ken and Stewart could be liable for willful negligence depending on ...
Submitted by shekhanzai on April 17, 2008
Category: English
Words: 3352 | Pages: 14
Views: 221
Popularity Rank: 43,951
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
EXISTENCE OF A DUTY
Before 1932 there was no generalised duty of care in negligence. The tort did exist and was applied in particular situations where the courts had decided that a duty should be owed, eg, road accidents, bailments or dangerous goods. In Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562, Lord Atkin attempted to lay down a general principle which would cover all the circumstances where the courts had already held that there could be liability for negligence. He said:
"The rule that you are to love your neighbour becomes in law, you must not injure your neighbour; and the lawyer's question, Who is my neighbour? receives a restricted reply. You must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbour. Who, then, in law is my neighbour? The answer seems to be - persons who are so closely and directly affected by my act that I ought reasonably to have them in contemplation as being so affected when I am directing my mind to the acts or omissions which are called in question."
This test has been criticised as being too wide but it made it easier for lawyers to argue that there should be liability for negligently causing harm in new situations, not previously covered by case law. In 1970, Lord Reid said that Lord Atkin's dictum ought to apply unless there was some justification or valid explanation for its exclusion (Home Office v Dorset Yacht Co [1970] AC 1004).
In Anns v Merton LBC [1977] 2 All ER 492, the House of Lords confirmed this. Lord Wilberforce stated that:
"in order to establish that a duty of care arises in a particular situation, it is not necessary to bring the facts of that situation within those of previous situations in which a duty of care has been held to exist. Rather the question has to be approached in two stages. First one has to ask whether, as between the alleged wrongdoer and the...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!