OPPapers.com Essay Index >> Social Issues >> Moral Obligation: Do Animals Have Rights?
We have many free term papers and essays on Moral Obligation: Do Animals Have Rights?. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
Moral Obligation: Do Animals Have Rights? A moral obligation is a theory according to which obligations arise from a social contract which is dictated by the demands
Animal rights What is the moral status of non-human animals? Do they have rights? This question, and all of it's complex entities, stands at the forefront among
which has performed open pit mining in some previously unspoiled area. Does the company have a moral obligation to restore the landform and surface ecology? And what
Singer's views to justify the obligation to be a vegetarian and to treat animals in a more humane manner a convincing argument; however, his views do not advocate
heart I know that animals weren't just put on this earth to be used by man, animals feel pain, and have feelings, and we have a moral obligation to respect that.
Submitted by ernieb532 on June 11, 2008
Category: Social Issues
Words: 796 | Pages: 4
Views: 250
Popularity Rank: 56,868
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
A moral obligation is a theory according to which obligations arise from a social contract which is dictated by the demands or expectations of a society. Morals in separate are defined as the perpetrating concern with the principles or rules of right conduct or the distinction between right and wrong. Obligations are defined as something by which a person is bound or obliged to do certain things and which arises out of a sense of duty from a custom or law. With this knowledge, add in Michael Pollan’s argument that moral thinking “is an artifact of human culture devised to help us negotiate social relations” (Pollan, 235). With all of these definitions at hand, it is easy to argue that humans are in charge of creating their own ideas of right and wrong as long as a majority of society agrees with them. When asked then, “what are our moral obligations to animals”, I am apt to argue that we have no obligations to them due to the fact animals, as a species, do not take part in this social contract or in defining what is right or wrong. We are bound by laws which we create as agents and animals are only subjected to our rules.
Immanuel Kant argued that as humans, we have positive obligations to animals that grant them no rights other than those we might establish conventionally by law due to the fact that they themselves are not moral agents, those that can act morally, and cannot understand the “concept of rights” (Pollan, 228). “Rights” are defined as that which is morally good, legal, proper or fitting. Morals, as defined earlier are a human concept which means that rights do not have to be granted to those who are not defined as “humans” meaning animals do not fall into this category. As humans, it is our right to use animals for our betterment because we can understand the larger concepts in life like morals, laws, and progress. As Pollan points out, most animal activists are willing to balance the benefits to humans against the cost...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!