Preview

Module Two: Lab Questions

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
339 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Module Two: Lab Questions
1.Why was the Crippen case important?
-It was so important because it was a landmark case, it was known for being the crime of the century, the first trial by media and the first to be dominated by forensic science.
2.What was Crippen accused of? Why was he accused of this crime?
-He was accused of poisoning and dismembering his wife. He was accused of this crime because he was her husband.
3.Why do you think people were so interested in Crippen's case?
-I think it was so interesting to people because it was a rare case, not everyday someone killed there spouse with poison and then cut into pieces.
4.Why was forensic science important in Crippen's trial? How was it used in the trial?
- Forensic science was very important in Crippen's trial because it was used to identify the victim, and explain how the victim died.

5.What do modern forensic scientists find when they examine samples of the remains?
-They found that the DNA results show that the DNA of descendants of Cora did not match the victims which means it wasnt Cora.
6.What other evidence linked Crippen to the remains in the cellar?
-Evidence that linked Crippen to the cellar was a pajama t-shirt with a blood stain and the pajama pants they found in his room.

7.What other inconsistencies were found in the case when the evidence was re-examined? Why do you think these inconsistencies were ignored at the time of the Crippen trial?
-Some of the other inconsistencies were found in the case when the evidence was re-examined is who after poisoning a victim cuts up the victim, usually when someone murders a person by poisoning they want it to look like a natural death. Also the forensic scientist found the poison of the body three days after searching Crippen's house and only two people were there, this is a bit suspicious. I

8.Do you think Crippen killed his wife? Why or why not?

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Old Cold Case Summary

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The woman name was Janet Marie Robinson. The case was solved after the man who was responsible was pulled from his coffin to confirm the case.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One mistake that the police made was a failure to search a certain room A police officer stood in front of the door to that room, but he walked away without going in (Keene-Osborne, Glick, and Murr 1). Jonbenet’s dad later found her in that same room (Schiller 2). One of the family’s friends said that they had looked in the room before, but they had not seen the body (Keene-Osborne, Glick, and Murr 2). When Jonbenet’s dad found her, he carried her body upstairs, which contaminated the crime scene (Keene-Osborne, Glick, and Murr 1). After her dad moved her upstairs, a detective moved her body under the Christmas tree, which also removed any evidence that was on her body (Keene-Osborne, Glick, and Murr 3). Another one of the family’s friends tried to help by cleaning the kitchen, but they could have destroyed some of the evidence by doing so (Keene-Osborne, Glick, and Murr 2). There were also some very mysterious things about the crime. The police suspected that a black flashlight hit Jonbenet in the head. A flashlight was seen on the kitchen counter at their home on the morning that Jonbenet was found, but then it went missing (Howard 1). There was also a mysterious bear shown in some of the pictures of Jonbenet’s room. The bear was shown near other stuffed animals, but the Ramseys said that they had never seen this bear before. Some people wonder if it was brought in by an intruder (Howard 1). The mysterious murder of Jonbenet Ramsey may never be solved.…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4. Forensic science was important in Crippens trial to find out who the body part belonged to and if Crippen actually commited the crime. It was used in the trial to test skin to determine the sex of the person and if then to see if the dead persons body part in the cellar were Coras. They tested Coras great niece to compare thier DNA.…

    • 369 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The allegations were contradicted by other people within the trial. The jury saw that there was not enough evidence supporting that it was a clear print mistake, and that it instead was a act of malice.…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1.) The Crippen case was important because it was the first case that forensic science was used in a court case.…

    • 221 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evidence that was most likely looked for in the investigation included water in the lungs of the children to prove they were drowned and not just placed in water after being killed another way. Another thing to have looked for would have been skin under the nails of the children or defensive wounds. One would also look for haemorrhaging, or profuse bleeding from ruptured blood vessels in the lungs and evidence of larynx spasm which would have caused the passageway to the lungs to be blocked. Even though no forensic evidence was at large, there is no doubt the case was easy to solve. With Andrea’s confession and the children’s bodies, it was a quickly solved…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jonbenet Ramsey was killed in the basement of her own home. Investigators have come to the conclusion that Jon Benet was killed by a hit to the head by a flashlight. By inexperienced detectives her death was filed that she was strangled to death. The murder was disguised as if a different crime had been committed. The killer disguised it as if someone came in and tied her up and then decided to cover it up. investigators realized it was all a cover up to the actual way Jon Benet was killed. The crime was committed by someone inside the home. But because of investigators relying too much on DNA, there is no evidence that necessarily points to patsy, John, nor Burke.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Forensic Science

    • 305 Words
    • 1 Page

    4. Why do you think the Willingham case is important? I think this case was very important because with out it we would not know as much about arson and test to prove it.…

    • 305 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The murder trial of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman is one of the most famous cases of all time. It was nationally televised and seen by millions and millions of people. The main suspect in this trial was O.J Simpson who is a retired football star. He was accused of the murder of his ex-wife Nicole Simpson and her “friend” Ron Goldman. This case was highly controversial and many people believe that O.J did murder both of them even though he was found not-guilty. This case had a lot of evidence including forms of forensic evidence.…

    • 1999 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    will then begin to outline my theory that Jay was the one who committed this murder.…

    • 1477 Words
    • 1 Page
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though police investigated over 2,500 potential suspects, the case was never officially solved. There were a few suspects that stood out, but the forensic technology of the times was not advanced enough to nail any one of them conclusively.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The main murders were the Tate and LaBianca murders People think that there might have been more murders than these but these were the ones that got the most attention. The Tate murders were of Sharon Tate, Jay Sebring, Abigail Folger, and Wojciech Frykowski, and Steven Parent.. The LaBianca Murders were of Leno LaBianca and his wife, Rosemary…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jonbenet

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There are many faults in this murder case, if many of which hadn’t happened the case probably would have been solved. For starts, the note that Patsy found was written on paper found in their household. A rough copy of…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Consequently, the second question was answered dismissing the Gauteng Division by saying that the court incorrectly conceived and applied the legal principals pertaining to circumstantial evidence because the court do not take into account the evidence of Cpt. Mangena, a police forensic expert, which proved that there was nowhere for the deceased to hide and that the accused must have foreseen the potentially fatal consequences of his actions, this was a crucial evidence that was not…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4. Why should we not believe the testimony of a murdered man as told through a medium?…

    • 131 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays