Me Talk Pretty One Day Analysis
Me Talk Pretty One Day is a collection of well-penned essays written by the author itself, David Sedaris. Unlike most fictional story, this book has no chapters nor does it apprise the reader of what happened in a chronological order. Structured around various essays, the story doesn’t necessarily link to one or another. For instance, the first essay, “Go Carolina”, talks chiefly about the author’s experience at the speech therapy sessions and how he struggles with the pronunciation of the letter s. The following essay, however, pinpoints on his father’s unfeasible expectations. Notwithstanding the book’s untidy form, David Sedaris rhetorically uses observational comedy, or a form of humor that scrutinize a person’s daily life, to capture readers’ attentions. Each essays is a detailed account of Sedaris’s daily life. The tones he uses throughout the book are satirical yet monotonous, given that he tries to convince the
…show more content…
His experiences in learning French in paris, which occupy most of part deux, have to do much with engaging the reader. For instance, during one of the conversation with his French teacher, he would often replace words that he does not understand with inane syllables or letters, placing the readers in his position. “ If you have not meimslsxp or lgpdmurct by this time, then you should not be in this room. Has every apzkiubjxow? Everyone? Good, we shall begin” (Sedaris, 167). These scrambled words signifies his lack of understanding of the language and his way of engaging the readers. Similar examples involve proposing dreadful grammar. Thanks to his harsh teacher, he huddles in the hallways with his classmates and express his sorrow: “Sometimes me cry alone at night” (Sedaris, 172). These variations are what shape the author’s stylish writings-- albeit it doesn’t make much sense-- and distinguish him from those of other
His experiences in learning French in paris, which occupy most of part deux, have to do much with engaging the reader. For instance, during one of the conversation with his French teacher, he would often replace words that he does not understand with inane syllables or letters, placing the readers in his position. “ If you have not meimslsxp or lgpdmurct by this time, then you should not be in this room. Has every apzkiubjxow? Everyone? Good, we shall begin” (Sedaris, 167). These scrambled words signifies his lack of understanding of the language and his way of engaging the readers. Similar examples involve proposing dreadful grammar. Thanks to his harsh teacher, he huddles in the hallways with his classmates and express his sorrow: “Sometimes me cry alone at night” (Sedaris, 172). These variations are what shape the author’s stylish writings-- albeit it doesn’t make much sense-- and distinguish him from those of other