OPPapers.com Essay Index >> Miscellaneous >> Managing Product Safety: The Ford Pinto
We have many free term papers and essays on Managing Product Safety: The Ford Pinto. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
Managing Product Safety: The Ford Pinto Shortly after its introduction, and throughout most of the 1970's, the Ford Pinto was one of Ford Motor's best-selling cars,
Pinto was introduced to the market. (Ford was in compliance with the pre-1976 Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards for gas tanks. New standards which the Pinto
Submitted by llbruzek on February 13, 2008
Category: Miscellaneous
Words: 2553 | Pages: 11
Views: 208
Popularity Rank: 69,150
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
Shortly after its introduction, and throughout most of the 1970's, the Ford Pinto was one of Ford Motor's best-selling cars, helping to strengthen Ford's market position within the industry. The Pinto was introduced to the market in September 1970 and dubbed by Ford as the "carefree little American car" (Davidson, p 3). The Pinto was Ford's answer to imported subcompact autos, which held 18.4% of the market, a market that had not yet been entered into by domestic auto manufacturers (Davidson, p. 3).
The design and development process of the Pinto began in June 1967. Lee Iacocca, Ford's president, directed that the Pinto was to be completed and on the showroom floor with the 1971 models. Ford engineers were able to complete the development, design, and production of the Pinto in 38 months; 5 months shorter than the industry average time of 45 months. Iacocca had another goal for the Pinto, "the limits of 2,000". "The Pinto was not to weigh an ounce over 2,000 pounds and not to cost a cent over $2,000" (Davidson, p 4).
The seemingly largest design hurdle to overcome on the Pinto was where to safely position the fuel tank. Late in the design phase of the Pinto, "an engineering study determined that the safest place for a fuel tank is directly above the rear axle" (Davidson, p 4). It was later determined however, that positioning the fuel tank over the rear axle would increase the threat of ignition. Also, by placing the fuel tank over the rear axle storage space would be reduced along with making servicing the vehicle more difficult (Davidson, p 4). It was then decided that the fuel tank would be positioned behind the rear axle and under the rear floor pan.
In January 1969, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) would propose its first standard concerning the safety of a vehicle from gas leakage in rear-end collisions. This new standard, Standard 301, would require that a "stationary vehicle should leak less than one ounce...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!