OPPapers.com Essay Index >> Philosophy >> Locke, Hobbes, Mill, Thoreau
We have many free term papers and essays on Locke, Hobbes, Mill, Thoreau. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
Locke, Hobbes, Mill, Thoreau. John Locke John Locke explains the state
of nature as a state of equality in which no one has power ...
Locke, Hobbes, Mill, Thoreau. John Locke John Locke explains the state
of nature as a state of equality in which no one has power ...
... Mill – ‘other regarding acts ... Hobbes and liberals regard the need for a state to prevent
‘a war of all against all ... Locke – minimal/night watchman state ...
Submitted by bp060182 on December 10, 2000
Category: Philosophy
Words: 1468 | Pages: 6
Views: 1291
Popularity Rank: 3,553
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
John Locke
John Locke explains the state of nature as a state of equality in which no one has power over another, and all are free to do as they please. He notes, however, that this liberty does not equal license to abuse others, and that natural law exists even in the state of nature. Each individual in the state of nature has the power to execute natural laws, which are universal.
I believe that Locke is correct in his analysis of the state of nature however; Locke‘s theory includes many assumptions. First is the assumption of a system of morality, the natural law derives from a theory of justice, a set of rights. No one would have any "rights" at all in the absence of a moral code applicable to human actions, nor would there be any standard of "just" punishment. Locke frequently uses the term "rights" and appeals to conscience and "calm reason", all of which reflect his assumptions about justice and morality.
For individual property to exist, there must be a means for individuals to appropriate the things around them. Locke starts out with the idea of the property of person; each person owns his or her own body, and all the labor that they perform with the body. When an individual adds their own labor, their own property, to a foreign object or good, that object becomes their own because they have added their labor. This appropriation of goods does not demand the consent of humankind in general, each person has license to appropriate things in this way by individual initiative.
Locke then places a bound on this type of acquisition, a person may only acquire as many things in this way as he or she can reasonably use to their advantage. One can only take so much as one can use. Lock applies these rules to land: a person in a state of nature can claim land by adding labor to it, building house on it or farming on it, but only so much as that person can reasonably use without waste. Locke then defines labor as the determining factor of...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!