Literature Review of 14-19 Education
BA/BA(Hons) Education and professional Development
DIA0120
Introduction to Research and Academic Writing
A Literature Review of the Development and Integration of 14-19 Vocational and Academic Pathways.
Contents
Abstract………………………………………………………………………...Page 3
History of 14-19 Education…………………………………………………..Page 4
Academic/Vocational Education and Funding…………………………….Page 5 -8
Teaching, Learning and Inspection.........................................................Page 9-11
Employer contribution………………………………………………………..Page11-13
The Future……………………………………………………………………..Page 13-15
Conclusion……………………………………………………………………..Page 15
Bibliography……………………………………………………………………Page 16-17
Abstract
This literature review compares research conducted and articles written about the development of 14-19 education and the changes it has gone through since 2002. It briefly outlines the initial implementation of 14-19 education during the Thatcher government before going on to concentrate on how the Labour government introduced Diplomas and what the Coalition government are doing to push this agenda forward. It asks whether academic and vocational education can ever be valued equally and whether the introduction of 14 year olds in further education establishments is successful or not. The majority of the literature was commissioned either by the government or conducted in 14-19 educational establishments. Similarities and comparisons between the research are identified and questions are asked as to how successful it might be in the future.
.
History of 14-19 Education
The idea of 14-19 education was introduced in 1983 by the Conservative government under its leader Margaret Thatcher. The first development was called the Technical and Vocational Education Initiative (TVEI), and was a pilot scheme was rolled out into schools and colleges in1988. The scheme was run by the Manpower Services Commission (MSC,) which came under the Department of Employment not the
DIA0120
Introduction to Research and Academic Writing
A Literature Review of the Development and Integration of 14-19 Vocational and Academic Pathways.
Contents
Abstract………………………………………………………………………...Page 3
History of 14-19 Education…………………………………………………..Page 4
Academic/Vocational Education and Funding…………………………….Page 5 -8
Teaching, Learning and Inspection.........................................................Page 9-11
Employer contribution………………………………………………………..Page11-13
The Future……………………………………………………………………..Page 13-15
Conclusion……………………………………………………………………..Page 15
Bibliography……………………………………………………………………Page 16-17
Abstract
This literature review compares research conducted and articles written about the development of 14-19 education and the changes it has gone through since 2002. It briefly outlines the initial implementation of 14-19 education during the Thatcher government before going on to concentrate on how the Labour government introduced Diplomas and what the Coalition government are doing to push this agenda forward. It asks whether academic and vocational education can ever be valued equally and whether the introduction of 14 year olds in further education establishments is successful or not. The majority of the literature was commissioned either by the government or conducted in 14-19 educational establishments. Similarities and comparisons between the research are identified and questions are asked as to how successful it might be in the future.
.
History of 14-19 Education
The idea of 14-19 education was introduced in 1983 by the Conservative government under its leader Margaret Thatcher. The first development was called the Technical and Vocational Education Initiative (TVEI), and was a pilot scheme was rolled out into schools and colleges in1988. The scheme was run by the Manpower Services Commission (MSC,) which came under the Department of Employment not the
Bibliography: Connexions. (2002). Results of the Connexions Service consultations held with young people on the green paper.14-19: extending opportunities, raising standards. Connexions. DfES. (2002). 14-19 green Paper Consultation Workshops Review. DfES. Foster, A. (2005). Realising the Potential, A review of the future of further education colleges. Nottinghamshire: DfES Publications. Nuffield Foundation. (2009). Educational for All The Future of Education and Training for 14-16 Year Olds. The Future of Education and Training for 14-16 Year Olds. Fuller, A. and Unwin, L. (2011). London Review of Education, Vocational education and training in the spotlight:back to the future for the UK 's Coalition Government. London: Routledge. Harkin, J. (2006). Behaving like adults:meeting the needs of younger learners in further education. London: Leaning and Skills Council. Higham, J and Yeomans, D. (2011). Thirty years of 14-19 education and training in England: Reflections on policy, curriculum and organisation. London Review of Education, 217-230. Hodgson, A. and Spours, K. (2010). Journal of Education and Work, Vocational qualifications and progression to higher education: the case of the 14-19 Diplomas in the English system. London: Routledge. Hodgson, A. and Spours, K. (2011). London Review of Education, Educating 14-19 year olds in England: a UK lens on possible futures. London: Routledge. Hodgson, A., Spours, K., and Waring, M. (2005). Higher Education, Curriculum 2000 and the future reform of 14-19 qualifications in England. London: Routledge. Teaching and Learning Research Programme. (2006). 14-19 Education and Training:A Commentary by the Teaching and Learning Research Programme. London: Teaching and Learning Research Programme. Tomlinson, M. (2004). 14-19 Curriculum and Qualifications Reform, Final Report on the Working Group on 14-19 Reform. Wolf, A Baker, L. (2011). ‘Wolf’s backing of vocational training is great, but she ducks the question of how much it will cost ‘The Times Educational Supplement. 25 March 2011, p.31. Meikle, J. (2007) ‘Diplomas being introduced too fast, warns MP’s’, The Guardian. 17 May 2007. [online] Vasager, J Wolf, A. (2012) ‘An end to qualifications that have no real value’ The Guardian. 31 January 2012. [online]