Learning & Performing Development In Asia - A Study Of The Evaluation Of Mcdonald's And Breadtalk's Training Programs
Below is one of our free research papers on Learning & Performing Development In Asia - A Study Of The Evaluation Of Mcdonald's And Breadtalk's Training Programs. If the term paper below is not exactly what you're looking for, you can search our essay database for other topics or order a custom essay.
Learning & Performing Development In Asia - A Study Of The Evaluation Of Mcdonald's And Breadtalk's Training Programs
Learning and Performance Development in Asia:
A Study of the Evaluation of McDonald’s & BreadTalk’s Training Programs
Executive Summary
This report reviews the current methods on evaluating training programs by BreadTalk, with an aim of improving its evaluation methods. Through a search of literature and an analysis of current methods, the report summarises the latest thinking on evaluating training programs and provides insights on how BreadTalk can improve the quality and management of its evaluations. A comparison with an overseas company, McDonald’s, was also done to provide suggestions for improvement for BreadTalk’s evaluation methods.
There are three key objectives of the report: first, to identify models, frameworks, methodologies, and approaches as well as their uses and feasibility in evaluating training programs; second, to summarize how the quality and effectiveness of these evaluations are assessed in theory and in reality, and mainly, what cutting-edge methods and approaches other organisations use to maintain the quality and effectiveness of their evaluations; and, third, to outline some common practices of corporate evaluation units.
Latest models. The review found that the reigning framework for evaluating training programs – and the subsequent models, methods and approaches – is one outlined more than forty years ago by Donald Kirkpatrick. His framework evaluates training programs in terms of four levels – reaction, learning, behavior, and results. Subsequently, Jack Philip’s five level Return On Investment (ROI) model became the conventional model for evaluating training. Basically it is similar to Kirkpatrick’s framework, with an additional level, the calculation of ROI. Other models analysed include the CIRO model and a few others. Critiques of the models are also mentioned.
Quality and effectiveness. The report found that there were no new, cutting-edge methods and approaches beyond the Kirkpatrick framework used by the two...
- Submitted by: venuzgal
- Date Submitted: 11/13/2008 03:01 PM
- Category: Business
- Words: 11128
- Pages: 45
- Views: 525
- Rank: 21920