Free Term Papers on The Kargil Conflict

OPPapers.com Essay Index >> History Other >> The Kargil Conflict

We have many free term papers and essays on The Kargil Conflict. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.

Essays from FratFiles.com
  1. The Kargil Conflict

    The Kargil Conflict. The Kargil Conflict In recent situations, US dissuasion
    has been more effective. During the Kargil conflict, from ...

  2. Gps And Gis In Military

    ... The necessity of knowing their own position by troops during war was very clearly
    highlighted during the Gulf War (1990) and the Kargil conflict (1999). ...

  3. Kashmir Conflict

    ... Indo Pakistani War of 1999: Kargil War The Kargil War, also known as the Kargil
    conflict, was an armed conflict between India and Pakistan that took place ...

  4. Cause And Effect The Indian-Pakistani Conflict And The Prospect Of ...

    ... Limited Conflict Under the Nuclear Umbrella: Indian and Pakistani Lessons
    from the Kargil Crisis. Pittsburgh: RAND 2001 United States. ...

  5. Pakistan

    ... of South Asia, the security dialogue with the United states and the crisis in Kargil.
    These developments, combined with the continuing conflict in Afghanistan ...

View More Papers...

The Kargil Conflict

Submitted by patton45 on November 8, 2005

Category: History Other
Words: 1642 | Pages: 7
Views: 143
Popularity Rank: 78,273
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)

The Kargil Conflict
In recent situations, U.S. dissuasion has been more effective. During the Kargil conflict, from May to July 1999, U.S. diplomacy was a critical factor in the Indian decision to limit the fighting to one isolated sector of the Line of Control in Kashmir. When Pakistani troops crossed the line in the early months of the year, India had the option of opening new fronts elsewhere in Kashmir or, potentially, along the international border with Pakistan proper. The decision not to expand the conflict horizontally or vertically was New Delhi's, but Washington's influence helped to reinforce Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee's preference for a limited operation to restore the Line of Control rather than open-ended war with the inherent potential for nuclear escalation. This new U.S.-Indian interaction during Kargil was founded on a relationship that had been painstakingly constructed since the early 1990's, highlighted by the intensive dialogue between Indian Minster of External Affairs Jaswant Singh and American Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott.
It was still a fragile and uncertain relationship in May 1999, but it gained strength during the crisis as the U.S. Administration clearly and publicly increased the pressure on Pakistan to withdraw its troops, while carefully ensuring that India's leaders were apprised of U.S. actions and perceptions. At the diplomatic climax of the conflict, for example, when Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif was meeting with President Clinton on the 4 th of July, the U.S. President telephoned Vajpayee several times to brief the Indian leader on the progress of the talks.[19] In its campaign to urge restraint on New Delhi, Washington was also successful in orchestrating approaches by other capitals, recognizing India's legitimate security interests but stressing the international importance of holding the combat to a limited, manageable level. Based on objective analysis and a conscious effort...

You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!