OPPapers.com Essay Index >> Philosophy >> Kants Dialectical Limitations
We have many free term papers and essays on Kants Dialectical Limitations. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
Kants dialectical limitations Kant's Dialectic Limitations "Mathematics, natural science, laws, arts, even morality, etc., do not completely fill the soul; there
Submitted by sarah412 on September 22, 2005
Category: Philosophy
Words: 1373 | Pages: 6
Views: 379
Popularity Rank: 32,798
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
Kant's Dialectic Limitations
"Mathematics, natural science, laws, arts, even morality, etc., do not completely fill the soul; there is always a space left over reserved for pure and speculative reason, the emptiness of which prompts us to seek in vagaries, buffooneries, and mysticism for what seems to be employment and entertainment, but what actually is mere pastime undertaken in order to deaden the troublesome voice of reason, which, in accordance with its nature, requires something that can satisfy it and does not merely sub serve other ends or the interests of our inclinations."
This statement comes from Immanuel Kant's Prolegomena of Future Metaphysics. It is a basic generalization and a concluding summary to the basic points found in the Prolegomena. It is also the basis for quandaries found by future philosophers such as Hegel and Marx. In Kant's view, dialectical reasoning is based on insufficiently examined premises which allow for unreliable tendencies. However by taking this position and limiting knowledge to that of which we can be certain, he creates a stagnant philosophy. Kant restricts his philosophy to the point that it is not capable of changing with history and he ignores the most interesting aspects of the human experience.
Kant used dialectic as the criticism of the logic of illusion in order to show the contradictions created when reason tries to go beyond experience to deal with transcendental objects, or the objects outside of human experience. Kant believed that judgments must be made using both reason and experience. He said that he didnt believe in the possibility of a judgment "to be derived merely from experience, and the necessity represented in them to be imaginary and a mere illusion produced in us by long habit." But he also believed that reason could not be the sole source of our judgment either. He also stated that "All cognition of things is merely from pure...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!