OPPapers.com Essay Index >> Philosophy >> Kant
We have many free term papers and essays on Kant. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
Kant's Formalism Theory. Kant's Formalism Theory The ... shaping of ethics
today. Immanuel Kant graced this earth from 1724 to 1804. ...
Utiltarianism vs Kant. Kant had a different ethical system which was based
on reason. ... Kant's theory can be defended on several premises. ...
KANT AND MORALITY. Kant and Morality Kant had a different ethical system which was
based on reason. ... Kant's theory can be defended on several premises. ...
Kant. Immanuel Kant, a supporter of capital punishment, offered us of the
most complicated, if not ambiguous, views on the subject. ...
Kant the man. Kant’s Principals ... motivations and actions. Kant wants to
derive good characters out of contingently right actions. ...
Submitted by oppapers on November 27, 2000
Category: Philosophy
Words: 708 | Pages: 3
Views: 1984
Popularity Rank: 1,273
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
Kant starts off making two distinctions regarding kinds of knowledge, empirical/rational and formal/material. Empirical or experience-based knowledge is contrasted with rational knowledge, which is independent of experience. This distinction between empirical and rational knowledge rests on a difference in sources of evidence used to support the two different kinds of knowledge. Formal is contrasted with material knowledge. Formal knowledge has no specific subject matter; it is about the general structure of thinking about any subject matter whatsoever. Material knowledge is of a specific subject matter, either nature or freedom. Rational knowledge is metaphysics, of which there are two branches, the metaphysics of nature and of morals. The metaphysics of nature is supposed to provide rational knowledge of the laws of nature. These are not empirical laws; they are more like universal principles of nature that any empirical physical would presuppose, such as that no event in nature occurs without a natural cause. The metaphysics of freedom is supposed to provide knowledge of the laws of freedom. These are the universal rules, which free agents devise to govern them. Thus, Kant's grounding, his initial attempt at a critique of rational reason, is an investigation of the possibility of purely rational knowledge of morals. Take, for example, the Moral Rule: Thou shalt not lie. If the moral law is valid as the basis of moral obligation or duty, then it must be necessary. Kant using the word "necessity" means that the rule obligates or binds whatever the conditions or in all circumstances. It also means that the rule applies to all rational beings and not only to human beings. In this second sense we can say that the rule is universally binding. So in fact, moral rules are universal and necessary. If a moral rule is to be universal and necessary, the moral law must be derived from concepts of pure reason alone. Therefore, if a moral rule or law can only be derived from...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!