OPPapers.com Essay Index >> Philosophy >> Kant
We have many free term papers and essays on Kant. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
Kant's Formalism Theory. Kant's Formalism Theory The ... shaping of ethics
today. Immanuel Kant graced this earth from 1724 to 1804. ...
Utiltarianism vs Kant. Kant had a different ethical system which was based
on reason. ... Kant?s theory can be defended on several premises. ...
KANT AND MORALITY. Kant and Morality Kant had a different ethical system which was
based on reason. ... Kant?s theory can be defended on several premises. ...
Kant. Immanuel Kant, a supporter of capital punishment, offered us of the
most complicated, if not ambiguous, views on the subject. ...
Kant the man. Kant’s Principals ... motivations and actions. Kant wants to
derive good characters out of contingently right actions. ...
Submitted by satlitmfgrfi on March 12, 2008
Category: Philosophy
Words: 2407 | Pages: 10
Views: 83
Popularity Rank: 82,197
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
Kant's most original contribution to philosophy is his "Copernican Revolution," that, as he puts it, it is the representation that makes the object possible rather than the object that makes the representation possible. This introduced the human mind as an active originator of experience rather than just a passive recipient of perception. Something like this now seems obvious: the mind could be a tabula rasa, a "blank tablet," no more than a bathtub full of silicon chips could be a digital computer. Perceptual input must be processed, i.e. recognized, or it would just be noise -- "less even than a dream" or "nothing to us," as Kant alternatively puts it.
But if the mind actively generates perception, this raises the question whether the result has anything to do with the world, or if so, how much. The answer to the question, unusual, ambiguous, or confusing as it would be, made for endless trouble both in Kant's thought and for a posterity trying to figure him out. To the extent that knowledge depends on the structure of the mind and not on the world, knowledge would have no connection to the world and is not even true representation, just a solipsistic or intersubjective fantasy. Kantianism seems threatened with "psychologism," the doctrine that what we know is our own psychology, not external things. Kant did say, consistent with psychologism, that basically we don't know about "things-in-themselves," objects as they exist apart from perception. But at the same time Kant thought he was vindicating both a scientific realism, where science really knows the world, and a moral realism, where there is objective moral obligation, for both of which a connection to external or objective existence is essential. And there were also terribly important features of things-in-themselves that we do have some notion about and that are of fundamental importance to human life, not just morality but what he called the three "Ideas" of reason: God, freedom, and...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!