OPPapers.com Essay Index >> Philosophy >> Kant And Mill On Motives
We have many free term papers and essays on Kant And Mill On Motives. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
Kant and Mill on Motives. What makes something right? In the study of philosophy,
there are many views of what is right and what is wrong. ...
... consequences. In Kant's moral system unlike in Mill's the criterion of
right and wrong is not consequences but motives. According ...
... Unlike Kant, John Stuart Mill believed in an ethical theory ... Mill's main point is
that one should guide his or ... intrinsic nature of the act or the motives of the ...
... Unlike Kant, John Stuart Mill believed in an ethical theory ... Mill's main point is
that one should guide his or ... intrinsic nature of the act or the motives of the ...
... Unlike Kant, John Stuart Mill believed in an ethical theory ... Mill's main point is
that one should guide his or ... intrinsic nature of the act or the motives of the ...
Submitted by jeffyc13 on October 18, 2005
Category: Philosophy
Words: 416 | Pages: 2
Views: 935
Popularity Rank: 6,839
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
What makes something right? In the study of philosophy, there are many views of what is right and what is wrong. Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill have differing viewpoints of this topic.
John Stuart Mill has a philosophy known as Utilitarianism. In this way of thinking, ethics are based on the maximization of pleasure. In other words, it's based on the consequences of a given action. The basic principle of Utilitarianism is that "actions are right in so far as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness" happiness equals the absence of pain. Mill also touches on the fact that the quality, not only the quantity of pleasure matters. He illustrates this by saying it is "better to be a human dissatisfied than a pig satisfied." This view is different than that of Kant.
Immanuel Kant's take on our motives of ethics is that we are controlled by reason. He says, "There is no possibility of thinking of anything at all in the world, or even out of it, which can be regarded as good without qualification, except a good will." Kant believes that acts are seen as good only if one's actions are done from the motive of duty. Duty to their fellow man. But, without this duty, one must act on an inclination, using reason, that a particular action is morally good. Kant admits that doubt can always be raised as to the possibility of our ever acting from a disinterested sense of duty, that "there have always been philosophers who have absolutely denied the reality of this disposition in human actions and have ascribed everything to a more or less refined self-love."
I personally agree with Mill more than I do with Kant. You can go around any day of the week and see different people making different decisions based on what the outcome of that decision will bring. For instance, if a person is driving to work in a hurry, driving recklessly, they will still stop for a red light. Why? Because of the...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!