Preview

Judith Thomson A Defense Of Abortion

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1106 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Judith Thomson A Defense Of Abortion
Over the course of this semester in this class, we have read and discussed several different types of arguments. From searching for a basic definition of what it means to be an individual and survive as one to what it means to exist on equal footing with beings of other species, each argument has presented its own compelling views. As this class was my first philosophy class I have ever taken, certain arguments grabbed my attention more than others. Of these, the argument and position presented by Judith Jarvis Thomson in “A Defense of Abortion” caused me to rethink my view on the topic. Raised in a politically conservative environment, the argument against abortion I most commonly heard was that fetuses are people and should be afforded rights …show more content…
Thomson leverages three metaphors to make her point: a world-renowned violinist whose very existence depends on their sudden parasitic attachment to another; a celebrity whose touch is curative to anyone who receives it (note: not Jesus); and people-seeds that can take root wherever they land and result in people-plants growing without restriction. Thomson’s acceptance of fetal personhood appears to be in an effort to placate those who object to abortion on the grounds that “being human” is enough of a reason to not abort a fetus. By accepting this fetal personhood, Thomson embraces a rights-oriented position – the right to life of the mother, the right to life of the fetus, the right to not be killed, the right to autonomy, the right to not be forced into providing for another… the list can go on. While Thomson accepts that both a fetus and a mother both have mutually exclusive rights to life, Thomson also points out that in the case of a dependent being and supportive being (i.e., a fetus and a mother) that the dependent being’s right to life does not supersede the supportive being’s right to life. It is admirable that Thomson’s defense of this position goes on to include several instances of nuance, however ultimately the being …show more content…
A fetus cannot come into being without there being a mother to host the fetus within her person. A fetus comes into being via a biological interaction between an unfertilized egg and a sperm. The specific vehicle for this interaction is sexual reproduction. Within the human species, however, it is not always desired that a fetus be the final result of the sexual activity – Thomson explores this in her people-seeds metaphor. So if a woman engages in sexual activity of her own volition but without the intention of pregnancy and a pregnancy occurs, the woman stands to suffer at some level if the pregnancy is forced to continue. A woman possesses self-awareness, this is a fact. At a minimum, the self-awareness to have the ability to express preference or interest on a topic. This capacity for self-awareness, preferences, or interest is balanced out by the capacity for suffering if the woman is not able to realize her preferences or interests. In the case of an unwanted pregnancy, a woman may have the preference of terminating the pregnancy as to not adversely impact her life. After all, the woman has been alive long enough to establish a way of life and a career, the latter of which is arguably the most important aspect of maintaining oneself in our increasingly capitalistic western

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The goal of Judith Jarvis Thomson in her defense of abortion is to sway the ideas of those who are against abortion by challenging the arguments they give for thinking so. She begins by stating a premise. “For the sake of the argument” a human embryo is a person. This premise is one of the arguments most opponents of abortion use, but as she points out, isn’t much of an argument at all. These people spend a lot of their time dwelling on the fact that the fetus is a person and hardly any time explaining how the fetus being a person has anything to with abortion being impermissible. In the same breath, she states that those who agree with abortion spend a lot of their time saying the fetus is in fact not a person. Either way, no argument is really formed. No reasons are given. For sake of challenging an actual argument, she is disregarding this issue. With this premise out of the way, she addresses the basic argument the pro-choice campaign believes. “Every person has a right to life. So the fetus has a right to life. No doubt the mother has a right to decide what shall happen in and to her body; everyone would grant that. But surely a person’s right to life is stronger and more stringent than the mother’s right to decide what happens in and to her body, and so outweighs it. So the fetus may not be killed; an abortion may not be performed.” The remainder of her paper is a series of analogies meant to challenge the basic argument mention above. When looking at the analogies separately, they are in no way related to the abortion topic, but the conclusions drawn from each can be applied. Because these examples aren’t directly related to the debate, our emotions won’t necessarily be involved and we can clearly think about what is the “right” thing to do for each specific scenario.…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    After reading “A defense of Abortion” by Judith Jarvis Thomson and what he had to say with his violinist analogy involving the kidney replacement. I agree with what he has to say on not only abortion itself but, whether or not a fetus should have the right to the women’s body. I don’t think that the fetus should be given the right to use the women’s body because what if she does not what to have a baby and ends up getting pregnant anyway. Also, each time a woman engages in sexual intercourse, she is not inviting the fetus to live inside her body. This is why birth control and other contraceptives are not a sure deal when dealing with sexual intercourse. What if the birth control method fails and the women end's up getting pregnant? She did…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thomson begins her argument by questioning the validity of the argument proposed by anti-abortion activists. Thomson explains that "most opposition to abortion relies on the premise that the fetus is a human being….from the moment of conception" (153). Thomson thinks this is a premise that is strongly argued for, although she also feels it is argued for "not well" (153). According to Thomson, anti-abortion proponents argue that fetuses are persons, and since all persons have a right to life, fetuses also posses a right to life. Regardless, Thomson argues that one can grant that the fetus is a person from the moment of conception, with a right to life, and still prove that abortion can be morally justified. In order to prove this argument Thomson proposes the example of "the sick violinist."…

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The topic of abortion is a highly controversial issue in today's society, and various views are held concerning the morality of the procedure. Some people feel that abortion is simply cold-blooded murder, because it is their opinion that a 'foetus' is a human being from the moment of conception. However, others would argue that a foetus is merely insubstantial matter, dependant entirely on its mother's body for survival, with no real life of its own. It is for this reason that pro-abortionists support the woman's choice to undergo abortion. After all, why should something so small and insignificant, which is not yet human, be entitled to the same rights and privileges a real human has"…

    • 1652 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The statement "defense of abortion", gives us an another view to a problem of abortion. Mostly, Judith Jarvis Thompson protects pro-choice side, and she says that abortion is not immoral, and that it is logically correct action. However there are a lot of anti-abortion philosophers who are not agree with it. So Judith Thompson gives an arguments to proof her sides correctness. She says that mother has all rights to do anything with her body and things in her body. Judith Jarvis Thompson also believes that fetuses are not persons, and killing them is not immoral. However she says that there are also situations, when abortion is incorrect. Also she gave 3 main thought experiments to get another point of view to abortion.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Judith Jarvis Thompson 's A Defense of Abortion ' a different view of abortion is presented (47 . She contends that even if it is to be perceived that a fetus is a person worthy of the basic right to life still , it does not follow that abortion must be condemned just for that reason of the latter 's right to life . She asserted that abortion involves another individual , and another life for that matter . This means that the mother -her right to life and to her body- must also be considered…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jonathan Glover, in his article Matters of Life and Death casts dispersions on both pro-abortion and anti-abortion debates citing them as too knee-jerk emotional reactions diminishing the inherent complexity of the other side (1. Glover, CC2006, p. 0110). Glover comprehensively addresses the key points of both sides of the abortion debate and evaluates their inherent virtues, especially for those who hold these opinions, then methodically points out its flaws. Ultimately, Glover comes to the conclusion that though a fetus is a human at the moment of conception, the right to abort lies with the mother and her own self-determination.…

    • 1982 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due to boldily autonomy and the clear distinction between a fetus and a rational, self-aware person, abortion is morally permissible practically whenever the mother chooses it, given it is done humanely. Most people would agree that in cases where the woman did not choose pregnancy, like rape, abortion should be morally permissible due to bodily autonomy and the immorality of asking someone to undergo psychological and physical trauma due to something beyond their control. This is supported by the Famous Violinist argument which explains that women, especially those who are pregnant due to rape, are not morally obligated to endure this immense sacrifice, even if it would be nice to do so (Singer, 1975, p.113-114). Whilst Thomson’s argument has fallen under criticism based on utilitarianism, these arguments are countered by Singer’s deconstruction of the Conservative Argument and its flawed perception that human life is inherently special, which demonstrates the moral permissibility of most abortions. The Conservative Argument’s premise that a fetus is an innocent human can mean two things: either the fetus is a person that has self-awareness and rational thought or a fetus is a member of the human species (Singer, 1975, p.117).…

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After about nine months of seasickness and cravings, women have the power to bring life into this Earth. When women are not in the position to give birth during the late stage of their pregnancy, they usually have only two possible outcomes. In these cases, the decision should depend on what the family and the mother find best. The government should not intervene and choose for the mother as they most likely will not know the best option for the two. As the female population progresses and receives additional rights that will lead to equality, they are still restrained from making a choice for their own child that does not require assistance from authority on the sensitive convoluted topic. The fact that a late term abortion is required implies…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    goodwill

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The conservative position commonly spends most of their time establishing that the fetus is a person, but the moral impermissibility of abortion doesn’t follow simply from the admission that the fetus (as a person) has the right to life. In her view, the right to life is to be understood as the right not to be killed unjustly and does not entail the right to use another person’s body. The fetus’ right to life outweighs the mothers right to decide what happens in and to her body unless the mother is in an extenuating circumstance in which she did not voluntarily become pregnant or the mother’s life in danger because of the fetus.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomson Abortion

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Johnson starts off by going back to history telling the audience Roe v. Wade was announced during the "Dark Ages" stating "In the ensuing decades, knowledge regarding the development of unborn humans, and their capacities at various stages of growth, has advanced in quantum leaps." (Johnson), putting an example of why doctors should administer anesthesia into an unborn child around twenty weeks of pregnancy. Thomson's article starts off by explaining the alteration between baby rights and mother's rights coming from her very own perspective. She begins with how a woman has the right to choose her own lifestyle and how they want to live as long as it does not take away someone else's right to live and jumping straight to facts explaining her reasons. A difference between Johnson's and Thomson's articles is that Thomson gives her own analogy for her choice and debate on abortion and describes it as "...someone waking up strapped to a famous, but unconscious violinist." (Thomson). She uses this analogy to give the audience a different and better view on abortion. Thomson also uses number of rebuttals on her arguments and debates after each one of her paragraphs from each content. The two articles contrast in using examples. Thompson brings out more examples and has a bigger argument with abortion and the…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fetus Rights

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A fetus is born because the mother chooses to put aside her own rights and her own security in order to allow the future person to gestate inside her…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Don Marquis question

    • 1453 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are various views regarding abortion and whether it should be accepted. Applying the Doctrine of Sanctity of life is a conservative view against abortion. An observation made by Don Marquis believes that abortion is wrong because it deprives a being of a future like ours and it is morally analogous to killing a healthy adult. Therefore the argument of abortion being impermissible will lead to whether it is wrong to practice contraception and deprive a potential person of a future like ours. The response to Marquis’s theory by Alistair Norcross will be discussed in depth for the purposes of this essay.…

    • 1453 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abortion is a heavily debated issue in our country. Many people believe it is immoral and unethical, while some see it as a necessity. Whether the fetus is one or forty-five weeks old, many still see it as murder. At what point of the term of a woman’s pregnancy, is a fetus considered a human being? This issue is still up for further debate. The debate in regards to abortion stems from whether a woman should have the right to end her pregnancy or give birth. I personally do not believe in abortion, however, I also believe it is a woman’s right to make that decision, especially in situations regarding teen pregnancy, financial hardships, rape, and incest. The following paragraphs will describe these circumstances in greater detail, supporting why I support pro choice abortion rights.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The title is somewhat misleading because it's not a complete defense of Abortion it's more of a minimal defense. In Thomson's essay, she states that Abortion is not necessarily morally impermissible which means that there are times when it is permissible and there are times when it is not. She begins the essay by pointing out that people debate on whether or not a fetus is a person. Many people feel that If we had an answer to that then that would make things a whole lot simpler and we would know that if a fetus was a person then it would be morally impermissible to go forth with an abortion and if the fetus wasn't a person that it would be morally permissible to have an abortion. For the sake of argument, she goes on to say that a fetus is a person and even though that may be the case there are still many scenarios in which abortion is morally permissible.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays