OPPapers.com Essay Index >> Miscellaneous >> Should International Criminal Court Have Jurisdiction Over Darfur Atrocities?
We have many free term papers and essays on Should International Criminal Court Have Jurisdiction Over Darfur Atrocities?. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
Should International Criminal Court Have Jurisdiction Over Darfur Atrocities? Should International Criminal Court Have Jurisdiction Over Darfur Atrocities? With
The future of ICC The International Criminal Court is the latest and most promising development in the institutionalization of global justice. In the words of the
An analysis of International War Crimes (hypothetical) STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION The Hague court has jurisdiction to review the case against three Katonia nationals
world deals with problems with Bretton woods framework II. First paragraph a. ICC i. international criminal court" set up to solve war crimes internationally- hope
to shield Americans from frivolous or politically motivated prosecutions by the new International Criminal Court. Members of the U.N. Security Council have been grappling
Submitted by western1 on October 26, 2005
Category: Miscellaneous
Words: 1244 | Pages: 5
Views: 287
Popularity Rank: 46,885
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
Should International Criminal Court Have Jurisdiction Over Darfur Atrocities?
With terms like "genocide" and "crimes against humanity" being used to describe the situation in Darfur, there's growing debate over how to prosecute those responsible. Some are calling for the International Criminal Court to take the lead. But others say simply threatening prosecutions won't end the violence in Darfur or eliminate it causes.
Last summer, when Harvard professor Samantha Power visited Darfur, she asked many people where they would go if they could escape the violence? She says the "surprisingly common answer" was The Hague. She says they had somehow heard it was home to a court and they "wanted to go testify."
"I wouldn't say they knew about the International Criminal Court. That was a degree of specificity that I didn't encounter. What they knew was that there was this thing called The Hague that was out there. I didn't even ask if they knew where The Hague was. But they knew there was a place where bad people were sent and where over the course of recent years people like them who'd suffered had had the ability to go and testify," says Professor Power.
She describes their desire to testify as a "resilience and a determination."
"The single-mindedness of this desire, A, to have the story told by an outsider like me or a historian down the road but a willingness to open up and go back over all of that. Those grisly details of what has been done to them. And B, ultimately a desire to see justice done," she says.
One of those who are calling for the International Criminal Court to act on Darfur is former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook. In a commentary in The Guardian, he writes, "The gravest, most grotesque crimes against humanity since the International Criminal Court was set up are to be found in Darfur."
Mr. Cook supports a recommendation...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!