OPPapers.com Essay Index >> History Other >> How Important Is The Concept Of Trust In Australian National Identity? And How Does The Actual Australian Experience Of Trust And Distrust, And Attitudes To Each Other And To Government, Fit Into The Theoretical And Historical Discussions Of These Concepts We Have Undertaken So Far?
We have many free term papers and essays on How Important Is The Concept Of Trust In Australian National Identity? And How Does The Actual Australian Experience Of Trust And Distrust, And Attitudes To Each Other And To Government, Fit Into The Theoretical And Historical Discussions Of These Concepts We Have Undertaken So Far?. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
How Important Is The Concept Of Trust In Australian National Identity? ... The concept
of trust is a very important aspect of the Australian national identity. ...
... can see that they are mutually trust and respect ... Consequently, the market has become
more important in the ... Finally the concept of association applies where the ...
... be no risk of losing their trust, and also ... the anti-terrorism strategy, is the concept
of Australia ... And the main, and most important interest of Australia and ...
... The concept of mateship' has also been highlighted in the ... in which gift giving is
economically important, there may ... they have grown to know and trust them. ...
... The downside of social capital An important point in the ... Social capital: An
interdisciplinary concept. ... Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity ...
Submitted by free2go on June 9, 2008
Category: History Other
Words: 2172 | Pages: 9
Views: 54
Popularity Rank: 112,288
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
The concept of trust is a very important aspect of the Australian national identity. The prime reason that trust is central to the Australian national identity is that it has sparked a debate over traditional Australian ways to define themselves, questioning what would have been concrete aspects of being Australian, such as egalitarianism, the policy of ‘a fair go’ and the ever elusive, yet pervasive idea of ‘mateship’.
Firstly, we must define specifically what is meant by the word ‘trust’. One of the most influential theories on trust is the theory of “social capital”. Broadly, social capital refers to relationships between people or groups of people that have beneficial outcomes for one or more of the participants. The definitions and applications of social capital theory are varied because, as the term refers to all human interaction, it is highly context sensitive. Some of the major influential proponents of social capital theory are Francis Fukuyama , Robert Putnam and James Coleman . In spite of the morass of literature dealing with the subject the most concise definitions of social capital theory comes from the World Bank “Social capital is not just the sum of the institutions underpinning a society—it is the glue that holds them together.”
Secondly, we must discuss and identify what national identity is, and specifically how that relates to Australia. For our purposes, we will use the broadest and most accessible definition of national identity as Proposed by Ian McAllister “the feeling of being associated with a national group, defined by common heritage which may be based on many attributes, the most common being race, territory, language and history.” Of course, all Australians could identify themselves in a multitude of different ways (Asian-Australian, Indigenous, homosexual, Islamic, etc.), and not all of these methods relate in any way to a sense of national belonging, be it Australian or...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!