John McWhorter present extensive arguments on the interpretation of texting. A lot of people believe texting is killing language, but that’s not the case. Like McWhorter states, “Texting is a new way of writing young people are creating”, and there is nothing wrong with that. The reason people say texting kills language, is because they compare it to writing. These people need to understand that texting and writing are not the same thing, each is a separate thing and do their own job. “WYD”, “LOL”, and “OMG” are just a few acronyms used in today's texting, all these acronyms do is shorten up the conversation. McWhorter makes an excellent point when he explains how people don't think about punctuation when they are speaking, so why think about…
Part 4: How does context change the way we text? Do we text different people in different ways? Talk about features of text language – does the use of a feature depend on the audience and purpose of the message? Do you feel that you adapt your way of texting for specific purposes?…
“It has become our language of intimacy, a different sort of English that relates to family talk, the language I grew up with” (Tan 634). Family talk is the language she grew up talking to her mother in that sounds perfect to her, but imperfect to others.…
As stated in the article, “2b or Not 2b” by David Crystal, some people believe that texting is not a natural form of communication and that it is wrecking our language. Although some people may agree with this idea, studies have challenged this opinion. Rather than fearing the consequences of texting, people should embrace this evolution and understand that this new form of communication may actually have benefits on literacy. This author once stated, “there is no evidence that texting teaches people to spell badly: rather, research shows that those kids who text frequently are more likely to be the most literate and the best spellers, because you have to know how to manipulate language.” The moral panic created by this form of socialization should be diminished, as people have the power and ability to shape our future.…
The article I h8 txt msgs: How texting is wrecking our language, by John Humphrys, addresses text messaging as a threat to people's ability to engage formally in use of the English language; especially in the younger generation. John Humphrys takes a unique perspective when analyzing the practice of text messaging. Humphrys focuses on the present and mainstream uses of text messaging, without analyzing the historical processes and the language values of the so called text speak. This paper will argue against John Humphrys' claim. Text messaging is a valid form of language as it; has been created through historical and social processes; holds a set of unique and evolving characteristics; and therefore in no way harmful to the users' abilities to use the English language.…
My first thought when I read the title of the essay was abbreviations. One of the biggest and most consistent things you see through texts messages- yours or examples like in the text- are abbreviations, “wat” or “prson” these abbreviations would suggest to a reader that the sender is shortening these words for an added quickness to the text or making it easier for one to spell by using phonetic spelling, although through this we can see inconsistences even in the same text, where in one instance we have one of the girls texting “u” and “you” in the same message which really actually a lack of grammatical rules in this “created language”. It indicates to me that there is no such clear orthography and really one can do as one pleases which sounds like no one would really ever know what anyone is saying. However we do see a difference between Natalie and Lola and Natalie and Kate (Aunt) where we see as Kate is older she still uses a more grammatically correct approach to texting where she will still say the words “you” “what” and use “?” which when one compares to Natalie we can really see a difference, which further more suggest that the language is also age dependent. A way that the people who text seem to get around…
Verbal communication, either over the phone, video chat, or in person is less likely to be misunderstood. The reason for this is most people can verbalize there sentiments much more easily, allowing them to communicate there more clearly. Various characteristics, such as, body language, facial expressions and vocal tones are definite indicators of how the person is feeling at the time when communicating in person or by video chat. Texting can potentially be misunderstood as the reader cannot properly assess the mood of the person who is ending the message. A statement that is meant to be humorous can be taken seriously, and conversely a serious comment can be taken casually, leaving the reader and sender with a misunderstanding. An area of equal detriment is that the texting is limited to your writing skills. If the sender cannot express themselves well with writing, the reader can become confused or misinterpret what the sender is trying to say. This will cause a breakdown in communication and could quite possibly end in an argument. The use of acronyms can also be very confusing for those who do not text frequently. I have found that I get confused quite often because I do not utilize texting as often as others and I am not familiar with the multitude of acronyms that are used.…
With technology rife in today’s society are the boundaries between spoken and written language becoming ever nearer? It seems that young children, teenagers, adults and even the elderly are all turning to mobile devices as an aid of communication. The frequent use of texting has brought about new features, such as clipping, that are unique to the texting world, this is thought to be putting a strain on our abilities to use correct Standard English. In this essay I will explore the variety of language and text specific features used within text messaging. I will also analyse the various attitudes towards texting and finally give my own opinion.…
According to the essay Herodotus: Xerxes Invades Greece, from The Histories, Herodotus was a very famous historian, who gave his account of the battle of Thermopylae. It is significant though to recognize that Herodotus was Greek and giving an account of what happened when the Persians defeated them. In the text Xerxes has many incidents that portray him as superstitious and tyrannical. Some examples of Xerxes’ tyranny is his plans to “march an army through Europe against Greece,” his want to not rest until he has taken and burnt Athens, wants to extend the Persian territory throughout all of Europe, his beheading of his master- builders, and his lack of mercy towards his slave and his five sons. Xerxes shows his superstitions when he sends for the Magians to tell him why the sun has disappeared, and the day has so quickly tuned to night. Turning to the actions in battle, those of the Spartans tell me that they are a strong willed people who do not give up easily, if at all, even when faced with a great challenge and are outnumbered. Besides this essay showing the Greeks strong will, this essay seems to promote their use of wit and skill in tricking the Persians into thinking there were less of them than there actually was. The account was written by a Greek, so the information in the story would cast them in a more positive light. Lastly, in our text, Western Civilization, there is a thurough evaluation of the significance of the Persian invasions on the Greek political and intellectual…
Technology has came a long way and will continue to improve and explore unknown territories. One of the new things discovered is texting and while texting is helpful it has a lot of disadvantages and downfalls. If texting could be listed as a skill, many of my friends would qualify as highly skilled in that area. I am glued to my phone and always texting so I know firsthand just how much texting can be abused and its less than helpful qualities. Texting kills some good old fashioned phone call conversations, face time, and is making annoying phrases part of everyday talking; texting is an obsession for many people and is doing more damage than most people know by damaging people’s people skills.…
With more and more people using the internet and texting to contact each other there may be a problem with how fast someone responds to a message, leaving people wondering why haven’t they got back to me? Also non verbal types of communication can be taken the wrong way as people interpret messages wrong as they don’t have tone of voice to direct them.…
Verbal communication is increasingly becoming a problem in today’s society and it is because of smartphones. Our generation is known as the “texting generation”. These days, students talk to their friends using text messages or calling. This takes away our ability to talk to someone face to face. It affects college graduates not being confident enough to present themselves properly in an interview with a future employer. Texting interaction leaves out basic skills like, clear speaking, body language, eye contact with the person to whom they are speaking too, and the ability to listen and stay focused on what the person is saying.…
Writing is a great way to express ideas and thoughts within the mind. When it comes to texting it is a lot quicker to express ideas. Texting makes it easier to get the point. When writing an essay or sending a formal email standard english has to be in use, but when texting you can use slang or formal english.…
"Is Text Messaging Ruining the English Language?" Techopedia.com. Ed. Techopedia Staff. Techopedia, 7 Nov. 2012. Web. 09 Oct. 2013. .…
Today, the popularity of cell phone has become increasingly evident among college students’. It became a necessity like their notebooks and textbooks. The most widely feature of cell phone is text messaging service us or more mobile phones. SMS is often used by college students they mostly text in class, in the mall, while doing their household chores, while eating and watching TV and even texting while doing their home work and project. They also used text messaging to multi-task. However, multitasking has negative aspects such as decrease of performance and distraction that affects how we remember information (Gaither, 2008). Text messaging is convenient, fast and easy and cell phone users do not need to answer back text right away. Because of the convenience, college students find texting as one of the most suitable way of communicating with someone. Because of this, the growing concern among educators, parents, researchers and general public that this practice is damaging the use of language in writing and will affect the standard forms. The focus of this study is to find out if there is an implication of cell phone texting to…